General Relativity and Gravitation

, Volume 43, Issue 12, pp 3337–3354 | Cite as

Nordström’s scalar theory of gravity and the equivalence principle

Research Article

Abstract

General Relativity obeys the three equivalence principles, the “weak” one (all test bodies fall the same way in a given gravitational field), the “Einstein” one (gravity is locally effaced in a freely falling reference frame) and the “strong” one (the gravitational mass of a system equals its inertial mass to which all forms of energy, including gravitational energy, contribute). The first principle holds because matter is minimally coupled to the metric of a curved spacetime so that test bodies follow geodesics. The second holds because Minkowskian coordinates can be used in the vicinity of any event. The fact that the latter, strong, principle holds is ultimately due to the existence of superpotentials which allow to define the inertial mass of a gravitating system by means of its asymptotic gravitational field, that is, in terms of its gravitational mass. Nordström’s theory of gravity, which describes gravity by a scalar field in flat spacetime, is observationally ruled out. It is however the only theory of gravity with General Relativity to obey the strong equivalence principle. I show in this paper that this remarkable property is true beyond post-newtonian level and can be related to the existence of a “Nordström-Katz” superpotential.

Keywords

Equivalence principle Nordström theory Superpotential 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Damour T., Esposito-Farèse G.: Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 2093 (1992)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wei-Tou N.: Astro. Phys. J. 176, 769 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nordström G.: Phys. Zeit. 13, 1126 (1912)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nordström G.: Ann. d. Phys. 40, 856 (1913)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nordström G.: Ann. d. Phys. 42, 533 (1913)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Einstein A., Fokker A.D.: Ann. d. Phys. 44, 321 (1914)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Einstein A.: Phys. Zeit. 14, 1249 (1914)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norton, J.D.: Theories of gravitation in the twilight of classical physics. Part I, In: Renn, J. (ed.) The Genesis of General Relativity, vol. 3. Kluwer, Boston (2005). www.pitt.edu/jdnorton/papers/Nordstroem.pdf
  9. 9.
    Katz J.: Class. Quantum Grav. 2, 423 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katz J., Bicak J., Lynden-Bell D.: Phys. Rev. D 55, 5759 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deser S., Tekin B.: Phys. Rev. D 67, 084009 (2003) eprint [arXiv:hep-th/0212292]MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deser S., Tekin B.: Phys. Rev. D 75, 084032 (2007) eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/0701140]MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lu, H., Pope, C.N.: eprint [arXiv:hep-th/1101.1971]Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deruelle N., Katz J., Ogushi S.: Class. Quantum Grav. 21, 1971 (2004) eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/0310098]MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deruelle, N., Sasaki, M.: eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/1012.5386]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ravndal, F.: eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/0405030]Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giulini, D.: eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/0611100]Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Havas P., Goldberg J.N.: Phys. Rev. 128, 398 (1962)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bel L., Damour T., Deruelle N., Ibanez J., Martin J.: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 13, 963 (1981)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deruelle, N.: Thesis (1982). unpublishedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bruneton J.P.: AIP Conf. Proc. 861, 558–565 (2006) eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/0611021]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Garrett, T.M.: eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/1102.5332]Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shapiro S.L., Teukolsky S.A.: Phys. Rev. D 47, 1529 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hwei-Jang Y., Baumgarte T.W., Shapiro S.L.: Phys. Rev. D 63, 064035 (2001) eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/0011028]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deser S., Halpern L.: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 1, 131 (1970)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kraichan R.H.: Phys. Rev. 98, 1118 (1955)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Katz J., Livshits G.I.: Class. Quantum Grav. 25, 175024 (2008) eprint [arXiv:gr-qc/0807.3079]: see also their contribution to this volumeMathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris 7, APC, UMR 7164 du CNRSParis Cedex 13France

Personalised recommendations