Advertisement

General Relativity and Gravitation

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 1071–1086 | Cite as

New level of relativity

  • Carl H. Brans
Research Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

In their origins Einstein’s studies of relativity principles called into question the validity of important assumptions that had previously been made in formulating physical theories, assumptions made without investigation into alternatives. Examples of this include notions of absolute time and space, flat Euclidean geometry, and trivial topology. In this paper, we review an intermediate niche, differentiable (smooth) structure, which must be defined between topology and geometry. We now know that this choice need not be trivial. Just as it seemed for centuries to be obvious that space should be flat, so it would seem until recently that standard, trivial, smoothness for spacetime is the only choice. We now know that this is not true. In this paper we review these topics in the light of very surprising and often counter-intuitive mathematical discoveries of the last 20 years or so. Since our regions of observability are necessarily constrained we do not have any a priori justification for extending standard smoothness globally. This opens up the possibility of non-standard extension of solutions to field equations to exotically smooth regions, leading to examples such as exotic black holes and exotic cosmological models.

Keywords

Relativity Differential topology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Asselmeyer-Maluga T. and Brans C. (2007). Exotic Smoothness and Physics: Differential Topology and Spacetime Models. World Scientific Press, Singapore zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kretschmann E. (1917). Über den physikalischen Sinn der Relativitätspostulate, A. Einstein neue und seine ursprüngliche Relativitätstheorie. Ann. Phys. 53: 575–614 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jammer M. (1960). Concepts of Space. Harper, New York Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brans C. (1965). Invariant approach to the geometry of spaces in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 6: 94 zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sagan H. (1994). Space-filling Curves. Springer, Heidelberg zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milnor, J.: The discovery of exotic spheres. In: Cappel, J., et al. (eds.) Surveys on Surgery Theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2000) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brans C. (1994). Localized exotic smoothness. Class. Quant. Grav. 11: 1785–1792 zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asselmeyer-Maluga T. and Brans C. (2002). Cosmological anomalies and exotic smoothness structures. Gen. Rel. Grav. 34: 597–607 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asselmeyer T. (1996). Generation of source terms in general relativity by differential structures. Class. Quant. Grav. 14: 749–758 CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harvey, F., Lawson, H.: A theory of characteristic currents associated to a singular connection, Astérique 213 ed., Société Mathématique de France (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loyola UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations