Advertisement

Noninvasive Analytical and Diagnostic Technologies for Studying Early Renaissance Wall Paintings

  • I. CatapanoEmail author
  • G. Ludeno
  • C. Cucci
  • M. Picollo
  • L. Stefani
  • K. Fukunaga
Article
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

Electromagnetic imaging technologies, working at different frequencies, are widely exploited for noninvasive diagnostics since they allow an improvement of knowledge about the surveyed object without affecting its state of conservation. In this paper, imaging technologies, working from microwaves up to ultraviolet frequencies, are considered and their basis is reviewed by focusing the attention on their application in the frame of cultural heritage. Specifically, ultraviolet fluorescence, infrared reflectography, TeraHertz imaging and ground penetrating radar are taken into account and a survey protocol, based on their complementary and cooperative use, is proposed as a best practice for analysis and management of artistic masterpieces. The cooperative use of different technologies makes it, indeed, possible to investigate the same work of art by accounting for different aspects characterizing its drawing, creation and possible restoration, thus providing a global vision from the support up to its outermost layer. The advantages provided by the cooperative use of the above-listed technologies are, herein, discussed with respect to the case study of the wall painting annunciation by Fra Angelico, one of the masterpieces of the early Italian Renaissance located at the Museum of San Marco in Florence, Italy.

Keywords

Electromagnetic imaging Ultraviolet fluorescence Infrared reflectography TeraHertz imaging Ground penetrating radar Cultural heritage 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the director of the Polo Museale della Toscana, Stefano Casciu, and the director of the San Marco Museum, Marilena Tamassia, who gave the authors the opportunity to accomplish the surveys herein presented. Marco Poggesi, Giovanni Bartolozzi and Marco Croci of IFAC-CNR are also acknowledged for their support in the acquisition of the imaging data.

References

  1. Aldrovandi A, Picollo M (2007) Metodi di documentazione e indagini non invasive sui dipinti. Il Prato, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfred M, Broekaert JAC (2013) Mobile depth profiling and subsurface imaging techniques for historical paintings—a review. Spectrochim Acta Part B 88:211–230Google Scholar
  3. Annan AP (2003) Ground penetrating radar principles, procedures and applications. Sensors and software, Mississauga, Ont, Canada, p 278Google Scholar
  4. Bertani D, Cetica M, Poggi P, Puccioni G, Buzzegoli E, Kunzelman D, Cecchi S (1990) A scanning device for infrared reflectography. Stud Conserv 35(3):113–116.  https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1990.35.3.113 Google Scholar
  5. Bertero M, Boccacci P (1998) Introduction to inverse problems in imaging. Institute of Physics Publishing, BristolGoogle Scholar
  6. Buzzegoli E, Keller A (2009) Ultraviolet fluorescence imaging. In: Scientific examination for the investigation of paintings. A handbook for conservator-restores by Pinna et al, pp 204–206Google Scholar
  7. Casini A, Lotti F, Picollo M, Stefani L, Buzzegoli E (1999) Image spectroscopy mapping technique for non-invasive analysis of paintings. Stud Conserv 44(1):39–48Google Scholar
  8. Catapano I, Soldovieri F (2016) A data processing chain for terahertz imaging and its use in artwork diagmnostic. J Infrared Millim Terahertz Waves 4:518–530Google Scholar
  9. Catapano I, Soldovieri F (2019) THz imaging and data processing: state of the art and perspective. In: Persico R, Piro S (eds) Innovation in near-surface geophysics. Elsevier, Neil Linford, pp 399–417Google Scholar
  10. Catapano I, Affinito A, Gennarelli G, di Maio A, Loperte A, Soldovieri F (2014) Full three-dimensional imaging via ground penetrating radar: assessment in controlled conditions and on field for archaeological prospecting. Appl Phys A 115(4):1415–1422Google Scholar
  11. Catapano I, Gennarelli G, Ludeno G, Soldovieri F, Persico R (2019) Ground-penetrating radar: operation principle and data processing. In: Webster JG (ed) Encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering. Wiley, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1002/047134608x.w8383 Google Scholar
  12. Chang PC, Flatau A, Liu SC (2003) Health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Struct Health Monit 2(3):257–267Google Scholar
  13. Chew WC (1995) Waves and fields in inhomogeneous media. IEEE Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Coddington J, Siano S (2000) Infrared imaging of twentieth-century works of art. Stud Conserv 45(sup1):39–44.  https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2000.45.Supplement-1.39 Google Scholar
  15. Cucci C, Delaney JK, Picollo M (2016) Reflectance hyperspectral imaging for investigation of works of art: old master paintings and illuminated manuscripts. Acc Chem Res 49:2070–2079.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00048 Google Scholar
  16. Daffara C, Pampaloni E, Pezzati L, Barucci M, Fontana R (2010) Scanning multispectral IR reflectography SMIRR: an advanced tool for art diagnostics. Acc Chem Res 43(6):847–856Google Scholar
  17. Dandolo CLK, Picollo M, Cucci C, Jepsen PU (2016) Fra Angelico’s painting technique revealed by terahertz time-domain imaging (THz-TDI). Appl Phys A 122:898.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0396-x Google Scholar
  18. Daniels DJ (2004) Ground penetrating radar, IET radar, sonar, navigation and avionics, vol 2. Series 15. IET, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. de la Rie ER (1982) Fluorescence of paint and varnish layers (Part 1). Stud Conserv 27(1):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1982.27.1.1 Google Scholar
  20. Delaney JK, Trumpy G, Didier M, Ricciardi P, Dooley KA (2017) A high sensitivity, low noise and high spatial resolution multi-band infrared reflectography camera for the study of paintings and works on paper. Herit Sci 5(32):14Google Scholar
  21. Dong J, Locquet A, Melis M, Citrin DS (2017) Global mapping of stratigraphy of an old-master painting using sparsity-based terahertz reflectometry. Sci Rep 7(1):15098Google Scholar
  22. Dyer J, Verri G, Cupitt J (2013) Multispectral imaging in reflectance and photo-induced luminescence modes: a user manual. The British Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Eastman Kodak Company (1987) Ultraviolet and fluorescence photography, publication no. M-27. Eastman Kodak Ltd, RochesterGoogle Scholar
  24. Farrar CR, Worden K (2006) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):303–315Google Scholar
  25. Fukunaga K (2016) THz technology applied to cultural heritage in practice. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Fukunaga K, Picollo M (2010) Terahertz spectroscopy applied to the analysis of artists’ materials. Appl Phys A 100:591–597Google Scholar
  27. Gholizadeh S (2016) A review of non-destructive testing methods of composite materials. Proc Struct Integr 1:50–57Google Scholar
  28. Groves RM, Pradarutti B, Kouloumpi E, Osten W, Notni G (2009) 2D and 3D non-destructive evaluation of a wooden panel painting using shearography and terahertz imaging. NDT & E Int 42(6):543–549Google Scholar
  29. Guilbaut GG (1973) Practical fluorescence. Marcel Dekker Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Jol HM (2008) Ground penetrating radar theory and applications. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Kortüm G (1969) Reflectance spectroscopy. Principles, methods, applications. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Kubelka P, Munk F (1931) Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farbanstriche. Zeitschr. f. techno Physik, pp 593–601Google Scholar
  33. Lakowicz JR (1999) Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee Y-S (2009) Principles of terahertz science and technology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  35. Legrand S, Vanmeert F, Van der Snickt G, Alfeld M, De Nolf W, Dik J, Janssens K (2014) Examination of historical paintings by state-of-the-art hyperspectral imaging methods: from scanning infrared spectroscopy to computed X-ray laminography. Herit Sci 2(13):11Google Scholar
  36. Leone G, Soldovieri F (2003) Analysis of the distorted born approximation for subsurface reconstruction: truncation and uncertainties effect. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(1):66–74Google Scholar
  37. Masini N, Soldovieri F (2017) Sensing the past: from artifact to historical site, vol 16. Springer, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Measday D, Museums Victoria (2017) A summary of ultra-violet fluorescent materials relevant to conservation. National News. https://aiccm.org.au/national-news/summary-ultra-violet-fluorescent-materials-relevant-conservation
  39. Mittleman D (2003) Sensing with THz radiation. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. Mittleman DM, Jacobesen RH, Nuss MC (1996) T-ray imaging. IEEE J SelectTop Quantum Electron 2:679–692Google Scholar
  41. Peiponen K-E, Kuwata-Gonokami M, Axel Zeitler (hrsg. von) J (2013) Terahertz spectroscopy and imaging. Spinger, Heidelberg, pp 451–489Google Scholar
  42. Persico R (2014) Introduction to ground penetrating radar: inverse scattering and data processing. Wiley, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinna D, Galeotti M, Mazzeo R (eds) (2009) Scientific examination for the investigation of paintings. A handbook for conservator-restores. Centro di, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  44. Rogerio-Candelera MA, Lazzari M, Cano E (eds) (2013) Science and technology for the conservation of cultural heritage. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  45. Saeedkia D (ed) (2013) Handbook of terahertz technology for imaging, sensing and communications. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  46. Saladino ML, Ridolfi S, Carocci I, Chirico G, Caramanna S, Caponetti E (2016) A multi-disciplinary investigation of the “Tavolette fuori posto” of the “Hall of Barons” wooden ceiling of the “Steri” (Palermo, Italy). Microchem J 126:132–137Google Scholar
  47. Sandu ICA, Candeias A, van den Berg KJ, Sandbakken EG, Tveit ES, van Keulen H (2019) Multi techniques and multiscale approaches to the study of ancient and modern art objects on wooden and canvas support. Physical sciences reviews. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  48. Seco-Martorell C, López-Domínguez V, Arauz-Garofalo G, Redo-Sanchez A, Palacios J, Tejada J (2013) Goya’s artwork imaging with terahertz waves. Opt Express 21(15):17800–17805Google Scholar
  49. Sfarra S, Bendada A, Ibarra-Castenedo C, Ambrosini D, Paoletti D, Maldague X (2015) Santa Maria di Collemaggio Church (L’Aquila, Italy): historical reconstruction by non-destructive testing techniques. Int J Archit Herit 9(4):367–390Google Scholar
  50. Siegel PH (2002) Terahertz technology. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 50(3):910–928Google Scholar
  51. Soldovieri F, Crocco L (2011) Electromagnetic tomography. In: Ahmet S, Turk Koksal A, Hocaoglu Alexey A (eds) Vertiy subsurface sensing. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  52. Solimene R, Catapano I, Gennarelli G, Cuccaro A, Dell’Aversano A, Soldovieri F (2014) SAR imaging algorithms and some unconventional applications: a unified mathematical overview. IEEE Signal Process Mag 31(4):90–98Google Scholar
  53. Tamassia M (ed) (2017) Salve mater—the annunciation by Fra Angelico at San Marco. Quaderni del Museo di San Marco, Polo Museale della Toscana N.1, Sillabe s.r.l., LivornoGoogle Scholar
  54. van Asperen de Boer JRJ (1968) Infrared reflectography: a method for the examination of paintings. Appl Opt 7(9):1711–1714Google Scholar
  55. Wallace VP, Macpherson E, Zeitler JA, Reid C (2008) Three-dimensional imaging of optically opaque materials using nonionizing terahertz radiation. J Opt Soc Am Opt Image Sci Vis 25(12):3120–3133Google Scholar
  56. Walmsley E, Metzger C, Delaney JK, Fletcher C (1994) Improved visualization of underdrawings with solid-state detectors operating in the infrared. Stud Conserv 39:217–231Google Scholar
  57. Warda J, Frey F, Heller D, Kushel D, Vitale T, Weaver G (2011) Ultraviolet photography. In: AIC guide to digital photography and conservation documentation, 2nd edn. American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  58. Warda J, Frey F, Heller D, Vitale T, Weaver G (2017) In: Warda J (ed) The AIC guide to digital photography and conservation documentation, 3rd edn. American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment (IREA)National Research Council of Italy (CNR)NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Nello Carrara Institute of Applied Physics (IFAC)National Research Council of Italy (CNR)FlorenceItaly
  3. 3.National Institute of Information and Communication Technologies (NICT)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations