Advertisement

Geoprospecting Survey in the Archaeological Site of Aquinum (Lazio, Central Italy)

  • Maurizio Lazzari
  • Lara De Giorgi
  • Giuseppe Ceraudo
  • Raffaele Persico
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the results of a ground penetrating radar (GPR) prospecting survey performed in the Roman archaeological site of Aquinum are shown. The prospecting was performed in two distinct areas. The first one was close to the remains of the ancient thermal baths, where a public project intends to build a car park. The second area is close to an apsidal Roman building, and it was of interest to establish whether, and possibly up to what extent, the remains of this partially revealed structure continue, or maybe whether meaningful further structures are present.

Keywords

GPR Geophysical prospection Geoarchaeology Castrocielo 

References

  1. Bradford J, Huntley K, Friedman H, Boyles M (2018) Ground-penetrating radar surveys to investigate the Roman Colony of Libarna: augmenting drone and electrical resistivity data. In: Proceeding of 17th international ground penetrating radar conference GPR2018, pp 60–64, Rappesrwil, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  2. Ceraudo G (2004) Aquinum: la città romana. In: Ceraudo G (ed) Ager Aquinas. Aerotopografia archeologica lungo la valle dell’antico Liris (Roma), pp 13–23Google Scholar
  3. Ceraudo G, Murro G (2016) Aquinum: una città romana tra ricerca e prospettive di valorizzazione. Anales de Arqueología Cordobesa 27:59–76Google Scholar
  4. Ceraudo G, Vincenti V (2015) Le terme centrali di Aquinum (FR): considerazioni preliminari sulle fasi e sulle pavimentazioni. In: Atti del XX Colloquio dell’Associazione Italiana per lo Studio e la Conservazione del Mosaico (AISCOM) (Roma, 19–22 marzo 2014), Tivoli 2015, pp 257–266Google Scholar
  5. Ceraudo G, Molle C, Nonnis D (2013) L’iscrizione delle Terme Centrali di Aquinum. In: Orizzonti XIV, pp 101–109Google Scholar
  6. Goodman D, Piro S (2013) GPR remote sensing in archaeology. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lazzari M, Loperte A, Perrone A (2010) Near surface geophysics techniques and geomorphological approach to reconstruct the hazard cave map in historical and urban areas. Adv Geosci 24:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leucci G, Persico R, Grasso F, De Giorgi L (2015) Integrated GPR Prospecting with the support of Historical Archive research and Historical Research: three case studies in Lecce, Italy. Int J Conserv Sci 6(4):601–610Google Scholar
  9. Leucci G, De Giorgi L, Gizzi FT, Persico R (2016), Integrated geo-scientific surveys in the historical centre of Mesagne (Brindisi, Southern Italy). Natural Hazards. Springer. Natural Hazards. ISSN: 0921-030X.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2645-x (open access) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Linford N, Linford P, Martin L, Payne A (2010) stepped frequency ground-penetrating radar survey with a multi-element array antenna: results from field application on archaeological sites. Archaeol Prospect 17(3):187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mertens L, Persico R, Matera L, Lambot S (2016) Smart automated detection of reflection hyperbolas in complex GPR images with no a priori knowledge on the medium. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 54(1):580–596.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2462727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neubauer W, Gugl C, Scholz M, Verhoeven G (2014) The discovery of the school of gladiators at Carnuntum, Austria. Antiquity 88(339):173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nisio S, Scapola F (2005) Individuazione di aree a rischio sinkhole: nuovi casi nel Lazio meridionale. Il Quaternario. J Quat Sci 18(II):223–239Google Scholar
  14. Persico R (2014) Introduction to ground penetrating radar: inverse scattering and data processing. Wiley, New York. ISBN 9781118305003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Persico R, Ciminale M, Matera L (2014) A new reconfigurable stepped frequency GPR system, possibilities and issues; applications to two different Cultural Heritage Resources. Near Surf Geophys 12(6):793–801.  https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2014035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Persico R, Leucci G, Matera L, De Giorgi L, Soldovieri F, Cataldo A, Cannazza G, De Benedetto E (2015) Effect of the height of the observation line on the diffraction curve in GPR prospecting. Near Surf Geophys 13(3):243–252Google Scholar
  17. Piro S, Ceraudo G, Zamuner D (2011) Integrated geophysical and archaeological investigations of Aquinum in Frosinone, Italy. Archaeol Prospect 18:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Puente I, Solla M, Laguela S, Sanjurio-Pinto J (2018) Reconstructing the Roman site “Aquis Querquennis” (Bande, Spain) from GPR, T-LiDAR and IRT data fusion. Remote Sens 10(3):379.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Utsi E (2002) Barcombe Roman Villa: an exercise in GPR time slicing and comparative geophysics. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.462204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Archaeological and Monumental HeritageIBAM-CNRPZItaly
  2. 2.Institute for Archaeological and Monumental HeritageIBAM-CNRLecceItaly
  3. 3.University of SalentoLecceItaly
  4. 4.Uninettuno Corso Vittorio Emanuele IIRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations