Response of a Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Model to Greenland Ice Melting
- 459 Downloads
We investigate the transient response of the global coupled ocean–atmosphere system to enhanced freshwater forcing representative of melting of the Greenland ice sheets. A 50-year long simulation by a coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model (CGCM) is compared with another of the same length in which Greenland melting is prescribed. To highlight the importance of coupled atmosphere–ocean processes, the CGCM results are compared with those of two other experiments carried out with the oceanic general circulation model (OGCM). In one of these OGCM experiments, the prescribed surface fluxes of heat, momentum and freshwater correspond to the unperturbed simulation by the CGCM; in the other experiment, Greenland melting is added to the freshwater flux. The responses by the CGCM and OGCM to the Greenland melting have similar patterns in the Atlantic, albeit the former having five times larger amplitudes in sea surface height anomalies. The CGCM shows likewise stronger variability in all state variables in all ocean basins because the impact of Greenland melting is quickly communicated to all ocean basins via atmospheric bridges. We conclude that the response of the global climate to Greenland ice melting is highly dependent on coupled atmosphere–ocean processes. These lead to reduced latent heat flux into the atmosphere and an associated increase in net freshwater flux into the ocean, especially in the subpolar North Atlantic. The combined result is a stronger response of the coupled system to Greenland ice sheet melting.
KeywordsGreenland ice sheet melting Sealevel rise Coupled atmosphere–ocean experiments
While revising this paper, Peter Herrmann, a co-author of this paper, unexpectedly passed away and we are indebted for his contribution to this paper. We thank R. Ray and S. Luthke for providing the Greenland mass loss field. CRM acknowledges financial support through the Deutsche Forschungs Gemeinschaft (DFG) funded excellence initiative CliSAP during several research visits to the University of Hamburg. We also thank several anonymous referees who provided very constructive and helpful comments. Funded in part through a MPG (Max Planck Society) Fellowship, the Special Research Program (SPP 1257) “Mass transports and distribution in the Earth System” funded by the DFG, and the BMBF (Federal Ministery of Education and Sciencr) Project REAL-GOACE. Contribution to the CliSAP Excellence Cluster, also funded through the DFG.
- Agarwal N, Köhl A, Stammer D, Mechoso CR (2011) Atmospheric response to high latitude perturbations in oceanic fresh-water forcing (in preparation)Google Scholar
- Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) Decadal predictability of the Atlantic Ocean in a coupled GCM: forecast skill and optimal perturbations using linear inverse modelling. J Clim. doi: 10.1175/2009JCLI2720.1
- Hu A, Meehl GA, Han W, Yin J (2009) Transient response of the MOC and climate to potential melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet in the 21st century. Geophys Res Lett. doi: 10.1029/2009GL037998
- Köhler M (1999) Explicit prediction of ice clouds in general circulation models. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Ma HY, Mechoso CR, Xue Y, Xiao H, Wu CM, Li JL, DeSales F (2010) Impact of land surface processes on the South American warm season climate. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-010-0813-3
- Okumora YM, Deser C, Hu A (2009) North Pacific climate response to freshwater focring in the subarctic North Atlantic: oceanic and atmospheric pathways. J Clim. doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2511.1
- Pan DM, Randall DA (1998) A cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure. Q J R Meteorol Soc 124:949–981Google Scholar
- Pardaens A, Gregory JM, Lowe J (2010) A model study of factors influencing projected changes in regional sea level over the twenty-first century. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-009-0738-x
- Rahmstorf S, Crucifix M, Ganopolski A, Goosse H, Kamenkovich I, Knutti R, Lohmann G, Marsh R, Mysak LA, Wang Z, Weaver AJ (2005) Thermohaline circulation hysteresis: a model intercomparison. Geophys Res Lett. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023655
- Stammer D (2008) Response of the global ocean to Greenland and Antarctic ice melting. J Geophys Res. doi: 10.1029/2006JC004079
- Timmermann A, Okumura Y, An SI, Clement A, Dong B, Guilyardi E, Hu A, Jungclaus JH, Renold M, Stocker TF, Stouffer RJ, Sutton R, Xie SP, Yin J (2007) The Influence of a weakening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation on ENSO. J Clim. doi: 10.1175/JCLI4283.1