Surveys in Geophysics

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 163–206 | Cite as

Laboratory Electrical Conductivity Measurement of Mantle Minerals

  • Takashi Yoshino


Electrical conductivity structures of the Earth’s mantle estimated from the magnetotelluric and geomagnetic deep sounding methods generally show increase of conductivity from 10−4–10−2 to 100 S/m with increasing depth to the top of the lower mantle. Although conductivity does not vary significantly in the lower mantle, the possible existence of a highly conductive layer has been proposed at the base of the lower mantle from geophysical modeling. The electrical properties of mantle rocks are controlled by thermodynamic parameters such as pressure, temperature and chemistry of the main constituent minerals. Laboratory electrical conductivity measurements of mantle minerals have been conducted under high pressure and high temperature conditions using solid medium high-pressure apparatus. To distinguish several charge transport mechanisms in mantle minerals, it is necessary to measure the electrical conductivity in a wider temperature range. Although the correspondence of data has not been yet established between each laboratory, an outline tendency of electrical conductivity of the mantle minerals is almost the same. Most of mineral phases forming the Earth’s mantle exhibit semiconductive behavior. Dominant conduction mechanism is small polaron conduction (electron hole hopping between ferrous and ferric iron), if these minerals contain iron. The phase transition olivine to high-pressure phases enhances the conductivity due to structural changes. As a result, electrical conductivity increases in order of olivine, wadsleyite and ringwoodite along the adiabat geotherm. The phase transition to post-spinel at the 660 km discontinuity further can enhance the conductivity. In the lower mantle, the conductivity once might decrease in the middle of the lower mantle due to the iron spin transition and then abruptly increase at the condition of the D″ layer. The impurities in the mantle minerals strongly control the formation, number and mobility of charge carriers. Hydrogen in nominally anhydrous minerals such as olivine and high-pressure polymorphs can enhance the conductivity by the proton conduction. However, proton conduction has lower activation enthalpy compared with small polaron conduction, a contribution of proton conduction becomes smaller at high temperatures, corresponding to the mantle condition. Rather high iron content in mantle minerals largely enhances the conductivity of the mantle. This review focuses on a compilation of fairly new advances in experimental laboratory work together with their explanation.


Electrical conductivity High pressure Mantle Mineral Review 



I wish to express my sincere thanks to the Program Committee and LOC of the Beijing workshop, who offered me a chance to prepare and deliver this review. I am grateful to T. Katsura, E. Ito, D. Yamazaki, K. Baba, T. Koyama, H. Toh and H. Utada for discussion. The comments of two anonymous reviewers aided in improving the manuscript.


  1. Badro J et al (2003) Iron partitioning in Earth’s mantle: toward a deep lower mantle discontinuity. Science 300:789–791Google Scholar
  2. Bolfan-Cassanova N, Keppler H, Rubie DC (2000) Water partitioning between nominally anhydrous minerals in the MgO–SiO2–H2O system up to 24 GPa: implications for the distribution of water in the Earth’s mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 182:209–221Google Scholar
  3. Brodholt JP (2000) Pressure-induced changes in the compression mechanism of aluminous perovskite in the earth’s mantle. Nature 407:620–622Google Scholar
  4. Bullen KE (1937) Note on the density and pressure inside the Earth. J R Soc NZ 67:122–124Google Scholar
  5. Constable S (2006) SEO3: a new model of olivine electrical conductivity. Geophys J Int 166:435–437Google Scholar
  6. Constable S, Constable C (2004) Observing geomagnetic induction in magnetic satellite measurements and associated implications for mantle conductivity. Geochem Geophys Geosys 5:Q01006Google Scholar
  7. Constable SC, Shankland TJ, Duba AG (1992) The electrical conductivity of an isotropic olivine mantle. J Geophys Res 97:3397–3404Google Scholar
  8. Debye PP, Conwell EM (1954) Electrical properties of N-type germanium. Phys Rev 93:693–706Google Scholar
  9. Dobson DP (2003) Oxygen ionic conduction in MgSiO3 perovskite. Phys Earth Planet Inter 139:55–64Google Scholar
  10. Dobson DP, Brodholt JP (2000) The electrical conductivity of the lower mantle phase magnesiowüstite at high temperatures and pressures. J Geophys Res 105:531–538Google Scholar
  11. Dobson DP, Richmond NC, Brodholt JP (1997) A high temperature electrical conduction mechanism in the lower mantle phase (Mg, Fe)1−XO. Science 275:1779–1781Google Scholar
  12. Du Frane WL, Roberts JJ, Toffelmier DA, Tyburczy JA (2005) Anisotropy of electrical conductivity in dry olivine. Geophys Res Lett 32:L24315Google Scholar
  13. Duba AG, von der Gönna (1994) Comment on change of electrical conductivity of olivine associated with the olivine-spinel transition. Phys Earth Planet Int 82:75–77Google Scholar
  14. Evans RL, Hirth G, Baba K, Forsyth D, Chave A, Mackie R (2005) Geophysical evidence from the MELT area for compositional controls on oceanic plates. Nature 437:249–252Google Scholar
  15. Fei Y, Mao HK (1994) In situ determination of the NiAs phase of FeO at high pressure and high temperature. Science 266:1678–1680Google Scholar
  16. Gaillard F, Malki M, Iacono-Marziano G, Pichavant M, Scaillet B (2008) Carbonatite melts and electrical conductivity in the asthenosphere. Science 322:1363–1365Google Scholar
  17. Glover PWJ, Vine FJ (1992) Electrical conductivity of carbon bearing granulite at raised temperatures and pressures. Nature: 360:723–726Google Scholar
  18. Glover PWJ, Ross RG, Jolly H (1990) The measurement of saturated rock electrical conductivity at lower crustal temperatures and high pressures. High Press Res 5:705–707Google Scholar
  19. Goddat A, Peyronneau J, Poirier JP (1999) Dependence on pressure of conduction by hopping of small polarons in minerals mantle. Phys Chem Mineral 27:81–87Google Scholar
  20. Hiraga T, Anderson IM, Kohlstedt DL (2004) Grain boundaries as a reservoir of incompatible elements in the Earth’s mantle. Nature 427:699–704Google Scholar
  21. Hirose K, Fei Y, Ma Y, Mao H–K (1999) The fate of subducted basaltic crust in the Earth’s lower mantle. Nature 397:53–56Google Scholar
  22. Hirsch LM, Shankland TJ (1993) Quantitative olivine-defect chemical model: insights on electrical conduction, diffusion, and the role of Fe content. Geophys J Int 114:21–35Google Scholar
  23. Hirsch LM, Shankland TJ, Duba AG (1993) Electrical conduction and polaron mobility in Fe-bearing olivine. Geophys J Int 114:36–44Google Scholar
  24. Holme R (1998) Electromagnetic core–mantle coupling, I, explaining decadal changes in the length of day. Geophys J Int 132:167–180Google Scholar
  25. Huang X, Xu Y, Karato S (2005) Water content in the transition zone from electrical conductivity of wadsleyite and ringwoodite. Nature 434:746–749Google Scholar
  26. Irifune T, Ringwood AE (1993) Phase transformations in subducted oceanic crust and buoyancy relationships at depths of 600–800 km in the mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 117:101–110Google Scholar
  27. Irifune T, Sekine T, Ringwood AE, Hibberson WO (1986) The eclogite-garnetite transformation at high pressure and some geophysical implications. Earth Planet Sci Lett 77:245–256Google Scholar
  28. Ito E, Takahashi E (1989) Post-spinel transformations in the system Mg2SiO4–Fe2SiO4 and some geophysical implications. J Geophys Res 94:10637–10646Google Scholar
  29. Karato S (1990) The role of hydrogen in the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle. Nature 347:272–273Google Scholar
  30. Karato S, Dai L (2009) Comments on “Electrical conductivity of wadsleyite as a function of temperature and water content” by Manthilake et al. Phys Earth Planet Int 174:19–21Google Scholar
  31. Katsura T, Ito E (1996) Determination of Fe–Mg partitioning between perovskite and magnesiowüstite. Geophys Res Lett 23:2005–2008Google Scholar
  32. Katsura T, Sato K, Ito E (1998) Electrical conductivity of silicate perovskite at lower-mantle conditions. Nature 395:493–495Google Scholar
  33. Katsura T, Yokoshi S, Kawabe K, Shatskiy A, Okube M, Fukui H, Ito E, Nozawa A, Funakoshi K (2007) Pressure dependence of electrical conductivity of (Mg, Fe)SiO3 ilmenite. Phys Chem Mineral 34:249–255Google Scholar
  34. Kawai N (1966) A static high pressure apparatus with tapered multi-piston formed a sphere I. Proc Jpn Acad 42:285–288Google Scholar
  35. Kawai N, Endo S (1970) The generation of ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure by a split sphere apparatus. Rev Sci Instrum 41:425–428Google Scholar
  36. Keppler H, Kantor I, Dubrovinsky LS (2007) Optical absorption spectra of ferropericlase to 84 GPa. Am Mineral 92:433–436Google Scholar
  37. Kittel C (1996) Introduction to solid state physics, 7th edn. Wiley, New York 673 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Kohlstedt DL, Mackwell SJ (1998) Diffusion of hydrogen and intrinsic point defects in olivine. Z Phys Chem 207:147–162Google Scholar
  39. Kohlstedt DL, Keppler H, Rubie DC (1996) Solubility of water in the α, β and γ phases of (Mg, Fe)2SiO4. Contrib Mineral Petrol 123:345–357Google Scholar
  40. Kondo T, Sawamoto H, Yoneda A, Kato T, Matsumoto A, Yagi T (1989) Ultrahigh-pressure and high temperature generation by use of the MA8 system with sintered diamond anvils. High Temp High Press 25:105–112Google Scholar
  41. Kuvshinov A, Olsen N (2006) A global model of mantle conductivity derived from 5 years of CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC-C magnetic data. Geophys Res Lett 33:L18301Google Scholar
  42. Kuvshinov A, Utada H, Avdeev D, Koyama T (2005) 3-D modelling and analysis of Dst C-responses in the North Pacific Ocean region, revisited. Geophys J Int 160:505–526Google Scholar
  43. Lauterbach S, McCammon CA, van Aken P, Langenhorst F, Seifert F (2000) Mössbauer and ELNES spectroscopy of (Mg, Fe)(Si, Al)O3 perovskite: a highly oxidised component of the lower mantle. Contrib Mineral Petrol 138:17–26Google Scholar
  44. Lay T, Helmberger DV (1983) A lower mantle S-wave triplication and the shear velocity structure of D”. Geophys J R Astron Soc 75:799–838Google Scholar
  45. Lay T, Williams Q, Garnero EJ (1998) The core-mantle boundary layer and deep mantle dynamics. Nature 392:461–468Google Scholar
  46. Li X, Jeanloz R (1990a) Laboratory studies of the electrical conductivity of silicate perovskite at high pressures and temperatures. J Geophys Res 95:5067–5078Google Scholar
  47. Li X, Jeanloz R (1990b) High pressure–temperature electrical conductivity of magnesiowüstite as a function of iron oxide concentration. J Geophys Res 95:21609–21612Google Scholar
  48. Lin J-F et al (2005) Spin transition of iron in magnesiowüstite in Earth’s lower mantle. Nature 436:377–380Google Scholar
  49. Lin J-F, Weir ST, Jackson DD, Evans WJ, Vohra YK, Qiu W, Yoo C-S (2007a) Electrical conductivity of the lower-mantle ferropericlase across the electronic spin transition. Geophys Res Lett 34:L16305. doi: 10.1029/2007GL030523 Google Scholar
  50. Lin J-F, Vanko G, Jacobsen SD, Iota V, Strurzhkin VV, Prakapenka VB, Kuznetsov A, Yoo C-S (2007b) Spin transition zone in Earth’s lower mantle. Science 317:1740–1743Google Scholar
  51. Lizarralde D, Chave AD, Hirth G, Schultz A (1995) A Northern Pacific mantle conductivity profile from long-period magnetotelluric sounding using Hawaii to California submarine cable data. J Geophys Res 100:17837–17854Google Scholar
  52. Mackwell SJ, Kohlstedt DL (1990) Diffusion of hydrogen in olivine: implications for water in mantle. J Geophys Res 95:5079–5088Google Scholar
  53. Manthilake G, Matsuzaki T, Yoshino T, Yamashita S, Ito E, Katsura T (2009) Electrical conductivity of wadsleyite as a function of temperature and water content. Phys Earth Planet Int 174:10–18Google Scholar
  54. Mao HK (1973) Observation of optical absorption and electrical conductivity in magnesiowüstite at high pressures. Year B Carnegie Inst Wash 72:554–557Google Scholar
  55. Mao HK, Shen G, Hemley RJ, Duffy TS (1998) X-ray diffraction with a double hot-plate laser-heated daiamond anvil cell. In: Manghnani MH, Yagi T (eds) Properties of earth and planetary materials at high pressure and temperature. Am Geophys Union, Washington, pp 27–34Google Scholar
  56. McCammon C (1997) Perovskite as a possible sink for ferric iron in the lower mantle. Nature 387:694–696Google Scholar
  57. McCammon C (2005) The paradox of mantle redox. Science 308:807–808Google Scholar
  58. Ming LC, Bassett WA (1974) Laser heating in the diamond anvil press up to 2000°C sustained and 3000°C pulsed at pressures up to 260 kilobars. Rev Sci Instrum 45:1115–1118Google Scholar
  59. Murakmi M, Hirose K, Kawamura K, Sata N, Ohishi Y (2004) Post-perovskite phase transition in MgSiO3. Science 304:855–858Google Scholar
  60. Neal SL, Mackie RL, Larsen JC et al (2000) Variations in the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle beneath North America and the Pacific Ocean. J Geophys Res 105:2829–2842Google Scholar
  61. Ohta K, Hirose K, Onoda S, Shimizu K (2007) The effect of iron spin transition on electrical conductivity of magnesiowüstite. Proc Jpn Acad, Ser B 83:97–100Google Scholar
  62. Ohta K, Onoda S, Hirose K, Shinmyo R, Shimizu K, Sata K, Ohishi Y, Yasuhara A (2008) The electrical conductivity of post-perovskite in Earth’s D” layer. Science 320:89–91Google Scholar
  63. Ohtani E, Kagawa K, Shimomura O (1989) High-pressure generation by a multiple anvil system with sintered diamond anvils. Rev Sci Instrum 60:922–925Google Scholar
  64. Olsen N (1998) The electrical conductivity of the mantle beneath Europe derived from C-responses from 3 to 720 hr. Geophys. J. Int. 133:298–308Google Scholar
  65. Olsen N (1999) Induction studies with satellite data. Surv Geophys 20:309–340Google Scholar
  66. Omura K (1991) Change of electrical conductivity of olivine associated with the olivine-spinel transition. Phys Earth Planet Int 65:292–307Google Scholar
  67. Omura K, Kurita K, Kumazawa M (1989) Experimental study of pressure dependence of electrical conductivity of olivine at high temperatures. Phys Earth Planet Int 57:291–303Google Scholar
  68. Ono S, Ito E, Katsura T (2001) Mineralogy of subducted basaltic crust (MORB) from 25 to 37 GPa, and chemical heterogeneity of the lower mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 190:57–63Google Scholar
  69. Ono S, Oganov AR, Koyama T, Shimizu H (2006) Stability and compressibility of the high pressure phases of Al2O3 up to 200 GPa: implications for the electrical conductivity of the base of the lower mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 246:326–335Google Scholar
  70. Persson K, Bengtson A, Ceder G, Morgan D (2006) Ab initio study of the composition dependence of the pressure-induced spin transition in the (Mg1−x, Fex)O system. Geophys Res Lett 33:L16306. doi: 10.1029/2006GL026621 Google Scholar
  71. Peyronneau J, Poirier JP (1989) Electrical conductivity of the Earth’s lower mantle. Nature 342:537–539Google Scholar
  72. Roberts JJ, Tyburczy JA (1991) Frequency dependent electrical properties of polycrystalline olivine compacts. J Geophys Res 96:16205–16222Google Scholar
  73. Roberts JJ, Tyburczy JA (1993) Impedance spectroscopy of single and polyscrystalline olivine: evidence for grain boundary transport. Phys Chem Minerals 20:19–26Google Scholar
  74. Roberts JJ, Tyburczy JA (1999) Partial melt electrical conductivity: influence of melt compositon. J Geophys Res 104:737–747Google Scholar
  75. Romano C, Poe BT, Kreidie N, McCammon CA (2006) Electrical conductivities of pyrope-almandine garnets up to 19 GPa and 1700°C. Am Mineral 91:1371–1377Google Scholar
  76. Schock RN, Duba AG, Shankland TJ (1989) Electrical conduction in olivine. J Geophys Res 94:5829–5839Google Scholar
  77. Seifert KF, Will G, Voigt R (1982) Electrical conductivity measurements on synthetic pyroxenes MgSiO3–FeSiO3 at high pressures and temperatures under defined thermodynamic conditions. In: Schreyer W (ed) High-pressure researches in geoscience. Schweizerbart’sche, Stuttgart, pp 419–432Google Scholar
  78. Sempolinski DR, Kingery WD, Tuller HL (1980) Electrical conductivity of single crystalline magnesium oxide. J Am Ceram Soc 63:669–675Google Scholar
  79. Shankland TJ, Duba AG (1990) Standard electrical conductivity of isotropic, homogeneous olivine in the temperature range 1200–1500°C. Geophys J Int 103:25–31Google Scholar
  80. Shankland TJ, Peyronneau J, Poirier J-P (1993) Electrical conductivity of the earth’s lower mantle. Nature 366:453–455Google Scholar
  81. Sturhahn W, Jackson JM, Lin J-F (2005) The spin state of iron in minerals of Earth’s lower mantle. Geophys Res Lett 32:L12307. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022802 Google Scholar
  82. Sung C-M, Sung M (1996) Carbon nitrite and other speculative super hard materials. Material Chem Phys 43:1–18Google Scholar
  83. Takahashi E, Ito E (1987) Mineralogy of mantle periodotite along a model geotherm up to 700 km depth. In: Manghnani MH, Shono Y (eds) High-pressure research in mineral physics. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 427–437Google Scholar
  84. Tarits P, Hautot S, Perrier F (2004) Water in the mantle: results from electrical conductivity beneath the French Alps. Geophys Res Lett 31:L06612. doi: 10.1029/2003GL019277 Google Scholar
  85. Ten Grotenhuis SM, Drury MR, Spiers CJ, Peach CJ (2005) Melt distribution in olivine rocks beased on electrical conductivity measurements. J Geophys Res 110:B12201Google Scholar
  86. Tsuchiya T, Wentzcovitch RM, da Silva CRS, de Gironcoli S (2006) Spin transition in magnesiowüstite in Earth’s lower mantle. Phys Rev Lett 96:198501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.198501 Google Scholar
  87. Utada H, Koyama T, Shimizu H et al (2003) A semi-global reference model for electrical conductivity in the mid-mantle beneath the north Pacific region. Geophys Res Lett 31:1194. doi: 10.1029/2002GL016902 Google Scholar
  88. Wanamaker BJ, Duba AG (1993) Electrical conductivity of San Carlos olivine along [100] under oxygen- and pyroxene-buffered conditions and implications for defect equilibria. J Geophys Res 98:489–500Google Scholar
  89. Wang D, Mookherjee M, Xu Y et al (2006) The effect of water on electrical conductivity of olivine. Nature 443:977–980Google Scholar
  90. Wood BJ, Nell J (1991) High-temperature electrical conductivity of the lower-mantle phase (Mg, Fe)O. Nature 351:309–311Google Scholar
  91. Wood BJ, Rubie DC (1996) The effect of alumina on phase transformations at the 660 km discontinuity from Fe–Mg partitioning experiments. Science 273:1522–1524Google Scholar
  92. Xu Y, McCammon C (2002) Evidence for ionic conductivity in lower mantle (Mg, Fe)(Si, Al)O3 perovskite. J Geophys Res 107:2251. doi: 10.1029/2001JB000677 Google Scholar
  93. Xu Y, Shankland TJ (1999) Electrical conductivity of orthopyroxene and its high pressure phases. Geophys Res Lett 22:2645–2648Google Scholar
  94. Xu Y, Poe BT, Shankland TJ et al (1998a) Electrical conductivity of olivine, wadsleyite and ringwoodite under upper-mantle condition. Science 280:1415–1418Google Scholar
  95. Xu Y, McCammon C, Poe BT (1998b) Effect of alumina on the electrical conductivity of silicate perovskite. Science 282:922–924Google Scholar
  96. Xu Y, Shankland TJ, Duba AG (2000a) Pressure effect on electrical conductivity of olivine. Phys Earth Planet Int 118:149–161Google Scholar
  97. Xu Y, Shankland TJ, Poe BT (2000b) Laboratory-based electrical conductivity in the Earth’s mantle. J Geophys Res 105:27865–27875Google Scholar
  98. Yoshino T, Katsura T (2009) Effect of iron content on electrical conductivity of ringwoodite, with implications for electrical structure in the mantle transition zone. Phys Earth Planet Int 174:3–9Google Scholar
  99. Yoshino T, Walter MJ, Katsura T (2003) Core formation in planetesimals triggered by permeable flow. Nature 422:154–157Google Scholar
  100. Yoshino T, Walter MJ, Katsura T (2004) Connectivity of molten Fe alloy in peridotite based on in situ electrical conductivity measurements: implications for core formation in terrestrial planets. Earth Planet Sci Lett 222:625–643Google Scholar
  101. Yoshino T, Matsuzaki T, Yamashita S, Katsura T (2006) Hydrous olivine unable to account for conductivity anomaly at the top of the asthenosphere. Nature 443:973–976Google Scholar
  102. Yoshino T, Manthilake G, Matsuzaki T, Katsura T (2008a) Dry mantle transition zone inferred from electrical conductivity of wadsleyite and ringwoodite. Nature 451:326–329Google Scholar
  103. Yoshino T, Nishi M, Matsuzaki T, Yamazaki D, Katsura T (2008b) Electrical conductivity of majorite garnet and its implications for electrical structure in the mantle transition zone. Phys Earth Planet Int 170:193–200Google Scholar
  104. Yoshino T, Yamazaki D, Ito E, Katsura T (2008c) No interconnection of ferro-periclase in post-spinel phase inferred from conductivity measurement. Geophys Res Lett 35:L22303. doi: 10.1029/2008GL035932 Google Scholar
  105. Yoshino T, Matsuzaki T, Shatzkiy A, Katsura T (2009) The effect of water on the electrical conductivity of olivine aggregates and its implications for the electrical structure of the upper mantle. Earth Planet Sci Lett. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.09.032

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Study of the Earth’s InteriorOkayama UniversityTottoriJapan

Personalised recommendations