Open subgroups of the automorphism group of a right-angled building

  • Tom De MedtsEmail author
  • Ana C. Silva
Original Paper


We study the group of type-preserving automorphisms of a right-angled building, in particular when the building is locally finite. Our aim is to characterize the proper open subgroups as the finite index closed subgroups of the stabilizers of proper residues. One of the main tools is the new notion of firm elements in a right-angled Coxeter group, which are those elements for which the final letter in each reduced representation is the same. We also introduce the related notions of firmness for arbitrary elements of such a Coxeter group and n-flexibility of chambers in a right-angled building. These notions and their properties are used to determine the set of chambers fixed by the fixator of a ball. Our main result is obtained by combining these facts with ideas by Pierre-Emmanuel Caprace and Timothée Marquis in the context of Kac–Moody groups over finite fields, where we had to replace the notion of root groups by a new notion of root wing groups.


Right-angled buildings Right-angled Coxeter groups Totally disconnected locally compact groups open subgroups 

Mathematics Subject Classification

51E24 22D05 20F65 



This paper would never have existed without the help of Pierre-Emmanuel Caprace. Not only did he suggest the study of open subgroups of the automorphism group of right-angled buildings to us; we also benefited a lot from discussions with him. Two anonymous referees did a great job in pointing out inaccuracies and suggesting improvements for the exposition. We also thank the Research Foundation in Flanders (F.W.O.-Vlaanderen) for their support through the project “Automorphism groups of locally finite trees” (G011012N).


  1. 1.
    Abramenko, P., Brown, K.S.: Buildings, Theory and Applications, volume 248 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burger, M., Mozes, S.: Lattices in product of trees. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 92, 151–194 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baudisch, A., Martin-Pizarro, A., Ziegler, M.: A model-theoretic study of right-angled buildings. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 19(10), 3091–3141 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourdon, M.: Immeubles hyperboliques, dimension conforme et rigidité de Mostow. Geom. Funct. Anal. 7(2), 245–268 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caprace, P.-E.: Automorphism groups of right-angled buildings: simplicity and local splittings. Fund. Math. 224(1), 17–51 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caprace, P.-E., Marquis, T.: Open subgroups of locally compact Kac-Moody groups. Math. Z. 274(1–2), 291–313 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caprace, P.-E., Rémy, B.: Simplicity and superrigidity of twin building lattices. Invent. Math. 176(1), 169–221 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Capdeboscq, I., Thomas, A.: Cocompact lattices in complete Kac-Moody groups with Weyl group right-angled or a free product of spherical special subgroups. Math. Res. Lett. 20(2), 339–358 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, M.W.: Buildings are \({{\rm CAT}}(0)\). In: Geometry and Cohomology in Group Theory (Durham, 1994), volume 252 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pp. 108–123. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Medts, T., Silva, A.C., Struyve, K.: Universal groups for right-angled buildings. Groups Geom. Dyn. 12, 231–288 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haglund, F., Paulin, F.: Constructions arborescentes d’immeubles. Math. Ann. 325(1), 137–164 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kubena, A., Thomas, A.: Density of commensurators for uniform lattices of right-angled buildings. J. Group Theory 15(5), 565–611 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Macbeath, A.M., Świerczkowski, S.: On the set of generators of a subgroup. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 62 = Indag. Math. 62(21), 280–281 (1959)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reid, C.D.: Distal actions on coset spaces in totally disconnected, locally compact groups. ArXiv e-prints (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reid, C.D.: Dynamics of flat actions on totally disconnected, locally compact groups. New York J. Math. 22, 115–190 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rémy, B., Ronan, M.: Topological groups of Kac-Moody type, right-angled twinnings and their lattices. Comment. Math. Helv. 81(1), 191–219 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas, A.: Lattices acting on right-angled buildings. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 6, 1215–1238 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tits, J.: Le problème des mots dans les groupes de Coxeter. In: Symposia Mathematica (INDAM. Rome, 1967/68), vol. 1, pp. 175–185. Academic Press, London (1969)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomas, A., Wortman, K.: Infinite generation of non-cocompact lattices on right-angled buildings. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11(2), 929–938 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiss, R.M.: The Structure of Affine Buildings, volume 168 of Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiteit GentGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations