Quaternionic hyperbolic Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates

Original Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Let \(\mathrm {Sp}(2,1)\) be the isometry group of the quaternionic hyperbolic plane \(\mathbf{H}_{\mathbb {H}}^2\). An element g in \(\mathrm {Sp}(2,1)\) is hyperbolic if it fixes exactly two points on the boundary of \(\mathbf{H}_{\mathbb {H}}^2\). We classify pairs of hyperbolic elements in \(\mathrm {Sp}(2,1)\) up to conjugation. A hyperbolic element of \(\mathrm {Sp}(2,1)\) is called loxodromic if it has no real eigenvalue. We show that the set of \(\mathrm {Sp}(2,1)\) conjugation orbits of irreducible loxodromic pairs is a \((\mathbb {C}\mathbb {P}^1)^4\) bundle over a topological space that is locally a semi-analytic subspace of \(\mathbb {R}^{13}\). We use the above classification to show that conjugation orbits of ‘geometric’ representations of a closed surface group (of genus \(g \ge 2\)) into \(\mathrm {Sp}(2,1)\) can be determined by a system of \(42g-42\) real parameters. Further, we consider the groups \(\mathrm {Sp}(1,1)\) and \(\mathrm {GL}(2, \mathbb {H})\). These groups also act by the orientation-preserving isometries of the four and five dimensional real hyperbolic spaces respectively. We classify conjugation orbits of pairs of hyperbolic elements in these groups. These classifications determine conjugation orbits of ‘geometric’ surface group representations into these groups.

Keywords

Hyperbolic space Quaternions Free group representations Character variety Loxodromic 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Primary 57M50 Secondary 51M10 20H10 30F40 15B33 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Giannis Platis and Wensheng Cao for many comments and suggestions on a first draft of this paper. We are grateful to the referee for writing an elaborate report on our paper and for many suggestions to improve the structure of the paper. A part of this work was carried out when one of the authors, Gongopadhyay, was visiting the UNSW Sydney supported by the Indo-Australia EMCR Fellowship of the Indian National Science Academy (INSA): thanks to UNSW for hospitality and INSA for the fellowship during the visit. Thanks are also due to Anne Thomas for organising a seminar by Gongopadhyay on this topic at the Sydney University. Kalane thanks a UGC research fellowship for supporting him through out this project. Gongopadhyay acknowledges partial support from SERB-DST MATRICS project: MTR/2017/000355.

References

  1. 1.
    Apanasov, B.N., Kim, I.: Cartan angular invariant and deformations of rank 1 symmetric spaces. Sb. Math. 198(2), 147–169 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao, W.: Congruence classes of points in quaternionic hyperbolic space. Geom. Dedic. 180, 203–228 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, S.S., Greenberg, L.: Hyperbolic spaces. Contributions to Analysis: A Collection of Papers Dedicated to Lipman Bers, pp. 49–87 (1974)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao, W., Gongopadhyay, K.: Algebraic characterization of isometries of the complex and the quaternionic hyperbolic planes. Geom. Dedic. 157, 23–39 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cunha, H., Gusevskii, N.: The moduli space of points in the boundary of complex hyperbolic space. J. Geom. Anal. 22(1), 1–11 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao, W., Parker, J.R., Wang, X.: On the classification of quaternion Möbius transformations. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 137(2), 349–361 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Đoković, D.Ž., Smith, B.H.: Quaternionic matrices: unitary similarity, simultaneous triangularization and some trace identities. Linear Algebra Appl 428(4), 890–910 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Falbel, E.: Geometric structures associated to triangulations as fixed point sets of involutions. Topol. Appl. 154(6), 1041–1052 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gwynne, E., Libine, M.: On a quaternionic analogue of the cross ratio. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 22(4), 1041–1053 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gongopadhyay, K., Lawton, S.: Invariants of pairs in \({{\rm SL}}(4,{\mathbb{C}})\) and \({{\rm SU}}(3,1)\). Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 145(11), 4703–4715 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldman, W.M.: Mapping class group dynamics on surface group representations. In: Farb, B. (ed.) Problems on Mapping Class Groups and Related Topics, pp. 189–214. American Mathematical Society (AMS), Providence (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldman, W.M.: Trace coordinates on Fricke spaces of some simple hyperbolic surfaces. In: Handbook of Teichmüller theory, Vol. II. Volume 13 of IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, pp. 611–684. The European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gongopadhyay, K.: Algebraic characterization of the isometries of the hyperbolic 5-space. Geom. Dedic. 144, 157–170 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gongopadhyay, K., Parsad, S.: Classification of quaternionic hyperbolic isometries. Conform. Geom. Dyn. 17, 68–76 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gongopadhyay, K., Parsad, S.: On Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates of surface group representations into SU(3, 1). Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004117000159
  16. 16.
    Gongopadhyay, K., Parker, J.R., Parsad, S.: On the classifications of unitary matrices. Osaka J. Math. 52(4), 959–991 (2015)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kourouniotis, C.: Complex length coordinates for quasi-Fuchsian groups. Mathematika 41(1), 173–188 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lawton, S.: Generators, relations and symmetries in pairs of \(3\times 3\) unimodular matrices. J. Algebra 313(2), 782–801 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marden, A.: Hyperbolic Manifolds. An Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd edition of the Book previously published under the title ‘outer circles an introduction to hyperbolic 3-manifolds’ edition (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marché, J., Wolff, M.: The modular action on \({{\rm PSL}}_2({\mathbb{R}})\)-characters in genus 2. Duke Math. J. 165(2), 371–412 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parker, J.R.: Hyperbolic Spaces. Jyväskylä Lectures in Mathematics, vol. 2. University of Jyväskylä, (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parker, J.R.: Traces in Complex Hyperbolic Geometry, Geometry, Topology and Dynamics of Character Varieties. Lecture Notes Series 23, pp. 191–245. Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Co. (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Platis, I.D.: cross ratios and the Ptolemaean inequality in boundaries of symmetric spaces of rank 1. Geom. Dedic. 169, 187–208 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parker, J.R., Platis, I.D.: Complex hyperbolic Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates. Topology 47(2), 101–135 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parker, J.R., Platis, I.D.: Complex hyperbolic quasi-Fuchsian groups. In: Geometry of Riemann Surfaces, Volume 368 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, pp. 309–355. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parker, J.R., Short, I.: Conjugacy classification of quaternionic Möbius transformations. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 9(1), 13–25 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodman, L.: Topics in Quaternion Linear Algebra. Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014)MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tan, S.P.: Complex Fenchel–Nielsen coordinates for quasi-fuchsian structures. Int. J. Math. 5(2), 239–251 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tan, S.P., Wong, Y.L., Zhang, Y.: Delambre-Gauss formulas for augmented, right-angled hexagons in hyperbolic 4-space. Adv. Math. 230(3), 927–956 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Will, P.: Traces, cross ratios and 2-generator subgroups of \({{\rm SU}}(2,1)\). Can. J. Math. 61(6), 1407–1436 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Will, P.: Two-generator groups acting on the complex hyperbolic plane. In: Handbook of Teichmüller Theory, Vol. VI. Volume 27 of IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, pp. 275–334. The European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wolpert, S.: The Fenchel–Nielsen deformation. Ann. Math. 2(115), 501–528 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) MohaliS.A.S. NagarIndia

Personalised recommendations