Geometriae Dedicata

, Volume 109, Issue 1, pp 139–145 | Cite as

The Heegaard Genus of Amalgamated 3-Manifolds

  • Marc Lackenby


Let M and M′ be simple 3-manifolds, each with connected boundary of genus at least two. Suppose that Mand M′ are glued via a homeomorphism between their boundaries. Then we show that, provided the gluing homeomorphism is ‘sufficiently complicated’, the Heegaard genus of the amalgamated manifold is completely determined by the Heegaard genus of Mand M′ and the genus of their common boundary. Here, a homeomorphism is ‘sufficiently complicated’ if it is the composition of a homeomorphism from the boundary ofM to some surface S, followed by a sufficiently high power of a pseudo-Anosov onS, followed by a homeomorphism to the boundary of M′. The proof uses the hyperbolic geometry of the amalgamated manifold, generalised Heegaard splittings and minimal surfaces.


3-manifold Heegaard genus Haken manifold minimal surfaces hyperbolic geometry 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Freedman, M., Hass, J., Scott, P 1983Least area incompressible surfaces in 3-manifoldsInvent. Math.71609642Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hempel, J 20013-Manifolds as viewed from the curve complexTopology40631657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johannson, K 1995Topology and Combinatorics of 3-ManifoldsSpringer-VerlagBerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lackenby M.: Heegaard splittings, the virtually Haken conjecture and Property (τ), Preprint.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morgan, J.: On Thurston’s uniformization theorem for three-dimensional manifolds, In: The Smith Conjecture, Pure Appl. Math. 112, Academic Press, New York, 1979, pp. 37– 125Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pitts, J. and Rubinstein, J. H.: Existence of minimal surfaces of bounded topological type in three-manifolds. In: Miniconference on Geometry and Partial Di.erential Equations (Canberra, 1985), pp. 163–176Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rubinstein, J. H.: Minimal surfaces in geometric 3-manifolds, PreprintGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scharlemann, M.: Heegaard splittings of compact 3-manifolds, Handbook of Geometric Topology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002, pp. 921-953Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scharlemann M. and Thompson, A.: Thin position for 3-manifolds, In: Geometric Topology (Haifa, 1992), Contemp. Math. 164, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1992, pp. 231-238.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schoen, R., Yau, S 1979Existence of incompressible surfaces and the topology of 3-manifolds with non-negative scalar curvatureAnn. Math.110127142Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schultens, J 1993The classi.cation of Heegaard splittings for (compact orientable surface)×S1. ProcLondon Math. Soc.67425448Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schultens, J.: Heegaard genus formula for Haken manifolds, Preprint.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soma, T 2002Volume of hyperbolic 3-manifolds with iterated pseudo-Anosov amalgamationsGeom. Dedicata90183200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thurston, W 1980The Geometry and Topology of Three-manifoldsUniv. PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Lackenby
    • 1
  1. 1.Mathematical InstituteOxford UniversityOxfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations