Genetica

, Volume 140, Issue 7–9, pp 317–324 | Cite as

Exploring the evolutionary differences of SBP-box genes targeted by miR156 and miR529 in plants

Article

Abstract

The combinatorial control of one target by multiple miRNAs brings big challenges to elucidate its precise evolutionary mechanism. Squamosa promoter binding protein-like (SBP) gene family exhibits the different regulatory patterns, in which some members are only regulated by miR156 and others by miR156 and miR529. Here, we explored the different evolutionary patterns and rates between miR156 targets and miR529 ones in three species (moss, rice, and maize). Our work found that the miR529 targets were members of miR156 target dataset, indicative of cooperative control. Further phylogenetic analyses as well as gene structure features demonstrated that miR529 targets derived from a monophyletic branch of miR156 targets which evolved into two independent branches duo to the ancient gene duplication. Moreover, inspection of evolutionary rate parameters (dN/dS, dN and dS) for miR156 targets and miR529 ones revealed they were under different selection strength. MiR529 targets were more constraint by strong purifying selection and evolved conservatively with a slow rate. By contrast, miR156 targets evolved more rapidly and experienced more relaxed purifying selection, which may contribute to their functional diversification. Our results will enhance the understanding of different evolutionary fates of SBP-box genes regulated by the different numbers of miRNA families before functional studies.

Keywords

miRNA SBP-box genes Evolutionary rate Combinatorial control 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Large-Scale Scientific Facility (Grant No. 2009-LSF-GBOWS-01) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31200172).

Supplementary material

10709_2012_9684_MOESM1_ESM.doc (342 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 342 kb)

References

  1. Addo-Quaye C, Eshoo TW, Bartel DP, Axtell MJ (2008) Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr Biol 18(10):758–762. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.042 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO (2006) Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 23(9):1751–1761. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl040 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen JF, Mandel EM, Thomson JM, Wu Q, Callis TE, Hammond SM, Conlon FL, Wang DZ (2006) The role of microRNA-1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation. Nat Genet 38(2):228–233. doi: 10.1038/ng1725 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng C, Bhardwaj N, Gerstein M (2009) The relationship between the evolution of microRNA targets and the length of their UTRs. BMC Genomics 10:431. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-431 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chuck G, Cigan AM, Saeteurn K, Hake S (2007) The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nat Genet 39(4):544–549. doi: 10.1038/ng2001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuck G, Whipple C, Jackson D, Hake S (2010) The maize SBP-box transcription factor encoded by tasselsheath4 regulates bract development and the establishment of meristem boundaries. Development 137(8):1243–1250. doi: 10.1242/dev.048348 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuperus JT, Fahlgren N, Carrington JC (2011) Evolution and functional diversification of MIRNA genes. Plant Cell 23(2):431–442. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082784 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai X, Zhao PX (2011) psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res 39 (Web Server issue):W155-159. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr319
  9. German MA, Pillay M, Jeong DH, Hetawal A, Luo S, Janardhanan P, Kannan V, Rymarquis LA, Nobuta K, German R, De Paoli E, Lu C, Schroth G, Meyers BC, Green PJ (2008) Global identification of microRNA-target RNA pairs by parallel analysis of RNA ends. Nat Biotechnol 26(8):941–946. doi: 10.1038/nbt1417 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo AY, Zhu QH, Gu X, Ge S, Yang J, Luo J (2008) Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of the plant specific SBP-box transcription factor family. Gene 418(1–2):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.03.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeong DH, Park S, Zhai J, Gurazada SG, De Paoli E, Meyers BC, Green PJ (2011) Massive analysis of rice small RNAs: mechanistic implications of regulated microRNAs and variants for differential target RNA cleavage. Plant Cell 23(12):4185–4207. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.089045 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang C, Gu X, Peterson T (2004) Identification of conserved gene structures and carboxy-terminal motifs in the Myb gene family of Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica. Genome Biol 5(7):R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-7-r46 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kong H, Leebens-Mack J, Ni W, dePamphilis CW, Ma H (2004) Highly heterogeneous rates of evolution in the SKP1 gene family in plants and animals: functional and evolutionary implications. Mol Biol Evol 21(1):117–128. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S (2011) miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 39 (Database issue):D152–D157. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1027
  15. Lawrence CJ, Malmberg RL, Muszynski MG, Dawe RK (2002) Maximum likelihood methods reveal conservation of function among closely related kinesin families. J Mol Evol 54(1):42–53. doi: 10.1007/s00239-001-0016-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li YF, Zheng Y, Addo-Quaye C, Zhang L, Saini A, Jagadeeswaran G, Axtell MJ, Zhang W, Sunkar R (2010) Transcriptome-wide identification of microRNA targets in rice. Plant J 62(5):742–759. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04187.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ling LZ, Zhang SD (2012) Unraveling the distribution and evolution of miR156-targeted SPLs in plants by phylogenetic analysis. Plant Divers Resour 34(1):33–46Google Scholar
  18. Maher C, Stein L, Ware D (2006) Evolution of Arabidopsis microRNA families through duplication events. Genome Res 16(4):510–519. doi: 10.1101/gr.4680506 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Patthy L (1999) Genome evolution and the evolution of exon-shuffling—a review. Gene 238(1):103–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rajewsky N (2006) microRNA target predictions in animals. Nat Genet 38(Suppl):S8–S13. doi: 10.1038/ng1798 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, Bartel DP (2002) Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 110(4):513–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Riano-Pachon DM, Ruzicic S, Dreyer I, Mueller-Roeber B (2007) PlnTFDB: an integrative plant transcription factor database. BMC Bioinformatics 8:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-42 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roy SW (2003) Recent evidence for the exon theory of genes. Genetica 118(2–3):251–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D (2005) Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell 8(4):517–527. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.018 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28(10):2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25(24):4876–4882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Toledo-Ortiz G, Huq E, Quail PH (2003) The Arabidopsis basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Plant Cell 15(8):1749–1770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toth-Petroczy A, Tawfik DS (2011) Slow protein evolutionary rates are dictated by surface-core association. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(27):11151–11156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015994108 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Voinnet O (2009) Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell 136(4):669–687. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.046 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang S, Zhu QH, Guo X, Gui Y, Bao J, Helliwell C, Fan L (2007) Molecular evolution and selection of a gene encoding two tandem microRNAs in rice. FEBS Lett 581(24):4789–4793. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.09.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu G, Poethig RS (2006) Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana by miR156 and its target SPL3. Development 133(18):3539–3547. doi: 10.1242/dev.02521 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie K, Wu C, Xiong L (2006) Genomic organization, differential expression, and interaction of SQUAMOSA promoter-binding-like transcription factors and microRNA156 in rice. Plant Physiol 142(1):280–293. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.084475 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xing S, Salinas M, Hohmann S, Berndtgen R, Huijser P (2010) miR156-targeted and nontargeted SBP-box transcription factors act in concert to secure male fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22(12):3935–3950. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.079343 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zheng Y, Li YF, Sunkar R, Zhang W (2011) SeqTar: an effective method for identifying microRNA guided cleavage sites from degradome of polyadenylated transcripts in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1092 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Kunming Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
  2. 2.Plant Germplasm and Genomics CenterGermplasm Bank of Wild SpeciesKunmingChina
  3. 3.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations