Condition dependence and the nature of genetic variation for male sex comb bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster
- 134 Downloads
Genetic architecture of variation underlying male sex comb bristle number, a rapidly evolving secondary sexual character of Drosophila, was examined. First, in order to test for condition dependence, diet was manipulated in a set of ten Drosophila melanogaster full-sib families. We confirmed heightened condition dependent expression of sex comb bristle number and its female homologue (distal transverse row bristles) as compared to non-sex sternopleural bristles. Significant genotype by environment effects were detected for the sex traits indicating a genetic basis for condition dependence. Next we measured sex comb bristle number and sternopleural bristle number, as well as residual mass, a commonly used condition index, in a set of thirty half-sib families. Sire effect was not significant for sex comb and sternopleural bristle number, and we detected a strong dominance and/or maternal effect or X chromosome effect for both traits. A strong sire effect was detected for condition and its heritability was the highest as compared to sex comb and sternopleural bristles. We discuss our results in light of the rapid response to divergent artificial selection for sex comb bristle number reported previously. The nature of genetic variation for male sex traits continues to be an important unresolved issue in evolutionary biology.
KeywordsCondition dependence Drosophila melanogaster Sex comb Condition Genetic variation
We thank Wilfried Haerty for help in planning this study and statistical analysis, and Safiah Mai for help with formulating and preparation of experimental diets. This research was funded by an OGS scholarship to AA and an NSERC (Canada) grant to RSS.
- Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Falconer D, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Press, EssexGoogle Scholar
- Held LI, Grimson MJ, Du Z (2004) Proving an old prediction: the sex comb rotates at 16 to 24 hours after pupariation. Dros Inf Serv 87:76–78Google Scholar
- Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- Spieth HT (1952) Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 99:395–474Google Scholar