, Volume 138, Issue 8, pp 869–883 | Cite as

Introgression at differentially aged hybrid zones in red-tailed chipmunks

  • Sarah HirdEmail author
  • Noah Reid
  • John Demboski
  • Jack Sullivan


Hybrid zones allow us to investigate the maintenance and the break down of reproductive isolation; they are a window into the speciation process. Tamias ruficaudus (red-tailed chipmunk) has a roughly ring-like distribution in the Inland Northwest and includes two morphologically well-differentiated subspecies, T. r. ruficaudus (in the eastern portion of its range) and T. r. simulans (in the western portion). These taxa meet at two contact zones: the Lochsa River in Idaho and 200 km to the north, near Whitefish, Montana. The Lochsa Zone is encompassed within the Clearwater River Drainage, which has been proposed as a glacial refugium for many taxa throughout the Pleistocene, whereas the Whitefish Zone was under the Cordilleran ice sheet during the most recent glacial maxima approximately 10,000 years ago. Mitochondrial DNA introgression has been documented at both contact zones, yet the subspecies remain significantly distinct with respect to bacular morphology and no intermediate morphologies have ever been reported. Here, we elucidate differentiation and introgression of the nuclear genome using ten microsatellite loci and compare findings to previously described mitochondrial DNA haplotype distribution and introgression. We found significant substructure in the nuclear data; each subspecies is divided into at least two genetically distinct demes. At the Lochsa contact zone, individuals restricted to the mtDNA zone of introgression form a distinct deme at microsatellite loci whereas in the younger, Whitefish contact zone, there is no hybrid-zone specific group. The genetic distances of the demes within these two subspecies indicate recent northward expansion.


Hybridization Introgression Speciation Tamias 



We thank J. Good and the UI Mammalogy classes (1999–2003) for assistance with field collection. The Field Museum of Natural History, Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture and the Connor (Washington State University) provided tissue samples. L. Waits, M. Cantrell, B. Carstens, M. Koopman and T. Pelletier, C. Baers and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on this manuscript. This work was funded by NSF DEB-0717426 (to JS) and DEB-0716200 (to JD). Analyses were run on the bioinformatics core facility supported by the Initiative for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies (IBEST) and funded by NHI (NCRR 1P20RRO16448-01) and NSF (EPS-809935).


  1. Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217–1229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:113–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilgin R (2007) Kgtests: a simple Excel macro program to detect signatures of population expansion using microsatellites. Mol Ecol Notes 7:416–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brumfield RT, Jernigan RW, McDonald DB, Braun MJ (2001) Evolutionary implications of divergent clines in an avian (Manacus: Aves) hybrid zone. Evolution 55:2070–2087PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carstens BC, Degenhardt JD, Stevenson AL, Sullivan J (2005) Accounting for coalescent stochasticity in testing phylogeographic hypotheses: modeling Pleistocene population structure in the Idaho Giant Salamander Dicamptodon aterrimus. Mol Ecol 14:255–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21:550–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coyne J, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  8. Daubenmire R (1952) Plant geography of Idaho. In: Davis RJ (ed) Flora of Idaho. Brigham Young University Press, Provo, Utah, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  9. Delcourt PA, Delcourt HR (1993) Paleoclimates, paleovegetation, and paleoXoras during the late Quaternary. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed) Flora of North America, vol 1, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 71–94Google Scholar
  10. Detling LE (1968) Historical background of the flora of the Pacific Northwest. Bulletin No. 13. Museum of Natural History, University of Oregon, EugeneGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobzhansky T (1951) Genetics and the origin of species, 3rd edn. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1:47–50Google Scholar
  14. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Good JM, Sullivan J (2001) Phylogeography of the red-tailed chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus), a northern rocky mountain endemic. Mol Ecol 10:2683–2695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Good JM, Demboski JR, Nagorsen DW, Sullivan J (2003) Phylogeography and introgressive hybridization: chipmunks (genus Tamias) in the northern rocky mountains. Evolution 57:1900–1916PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Good J, Hird S, Reid N, Demboski J, Steppan S, Martin-Nims T, Sullivan J (2008) Ancient hybridization and mitochondrial capture between two distantly related species of chipmunks (Tamias: Rodentia). Mol Ecol 17:1313–1327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  19. Gustincich S, Manfioletti G, Delsal G, Schneider C, Carninci P (1991) A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood. BioTechniques 11:298–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardy OJ, Charbonnel N, Freville H, Heuertz M (2003) Microsatellite allele sizes: a simple test to assess their significance on genetic differentiation. Genetics 163:1467–1482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison R, Bogdanowicz S, Hoffmann R, Yensen E, Sherman P (2003) Phylogeny and evolutionary history of the ground squirrels (Rodentia: Marmotinae). J Mammal Evol 10:249–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heller HC (1971) Altitudinal zonation of chipmunks (genus: Eutamias): interspecific aggression. Ecology 52:312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heller HC, Gates DM (1971) Altitudinal zonation of chipmunks (genus Eutamias): interspecific aggression. Ecology 52:424–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hey J (2005) On the number of new world founders: a populations genetic portrait of the peopling of the Americas. PLoS Biol 3(6):e193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hey J, Nielsen R (2004) Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 167:747–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hird S, Sullivan J (2009) Assessment of gene flow across a hybrid zone in red-tailed chipmunks (Tamias ruficaudus). Mol Ecol 18:3097–3109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Howell AH (1922) Diagnoses of seven new chipmunks of genus Eutamias, with a list of the American species. J Mammal 3:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huelsenbeck J, Andolfatto P (2007) Inference of population structure under a Dirichlet process model. Genetics 175:1787–1802CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Huelsenbeck J, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic tress. Bioinformatics 17:754–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Langella O (2002) Populations 1.2.28: population genetic software (individuals or populations distances, phylogenetic trees). CNRS, FranceGoogle Scholar
  32. Mack RN, Rutter NW, Bryant VM Jr, Valastro S (1978) Reexamination of postglacial vegetation history in northern Idaho, Hager Pond, Bonner County. Quat Res 10:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maddison DR, Maddison WP (2003) MACCLADE. Sinauer & Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  34. Martinsen G, Whitham T, Turek R, Keim P (2001) Hybrid populations selectively filter gene introgression between species. Evolution 55:1325–1335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Minin V, Abdo Z, Joyce P, Sullivan J (2003) Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst Biol 52:674–683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nielsen R, Wakeley J (2001) Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158:885–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nosil P (2008) Speciation with gene flow could be common. Mol Ecol 17:2103–2106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Patterson BD, Heaney LR (1987) Preliminary analysis of geographic variation in red-tailed chipmunks (Eutamias ruficaudus). J Mammal 68:782–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patterson BD, Thaeler CSJ (1982) The mammalian baculum: hypotheses on the nature of bacular variability. J Mammal 63:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2)—population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  44. Reich DE, Goldstein DB (1998) Genetic evidence for a Paleolithic human population expansion in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:8119–8123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Reid N, Hird S, Schulte-Hostedde AI, Sullivan J (2010) Examination of nuclear loci across a zone of mitochondrial introgression between Tamias ruficaudus and Tamias amoenus. J Mammal (in press)Google Scholar
  46. Rice WR, Hostert EE (1993) Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years. Evolution 47:1637–1653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Gibbs HL, Millar JS (2000) Microsatellite DNA loci suitable for parentage analysis in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus). Mol Ecol 9:2180–2181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sullivan J, Joyce P (2005) Model selection in phylogenetics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:445–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sullivan J, Abdo Z, Joyce P, Swofford DL (2005) Evaluating the performance of a successive-approximations approach to parameter optimization in maximum-likelihood phylogeny estimation. Mol Biol Evol 22:1386–1392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer & Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  52. van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wakeley J (2000) The effects of subdivision on the genetic divergence of populations and species. Evolution 54:1092–1101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. White JA (1953) The baculum in the chipmunks of western North America. Univ Kans Mus Nat Hist Publ 5:611–631Google Scholar
  55. Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Won YJ, Hey J (2005) Divergence population genetics of chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 22:297–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu C-I (2001) The genic view of the process of speciation. J Evol Biol 14:851–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Hird
    • 1
    Email author
  • Noah Reid
    • 1
  • John Demboski
    • 2
  • Jack Sullivan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyDenver Museum of Nature & ScienceDenverUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations