Genetica

, 138:273

Parasite mediated homogenizing selection at the MHC in guppies

Article

Abstract

Understanding the selective forces influencing genetic diversity is a fundamental goal of evolutionary ecology. The genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) play a key role in the adaptive immune response of vertebrates and thus provide an excellent opportunity to examine the agents of selection on a functionally important gene. Here we examine the genetic architecture of the MHC class IIB genes in 10 wild populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in Northern Trinidad. We have previously shown that these populations are significantly less diverged at the class IIB locus than expected based on neutral (microsatellite) loci. We now survey infection by Gyrodactylus turnbulli and G. bullatarudis, common parasitic worms that infect guppies, as a potential agent of homogenizing selection. We used a genetic algorithm to partition both additive and non-additive genetic effects of the five most common MHC allele types as well as a rare allele category. Although we found no evidence for non-additive effects, across the populations we found that one allele type (the a-type) had a significant negative additive effect on parasite load. Thus, individuals who had more copies of the a-type allele were infected with fewer gyrodactylus than individuals with fewer copies of the allele. These results not only link parasite infection with MHC genotype, they provide a mechanism of homogenizing selection across these otherwise disparate populations.

Keywords

Major histocompatibility complex Poecilia reticulata Parasite selection Gyrodactylus 

References

  1. Cable J, van Oosterhout C (2007a) The role of innate and acquired resistance in two natural populations of guppies (Poecilia retiulata) infected with the ectoparasite Gyrodactylus turnbulli. Biol J Linn Soc 90:647–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cable J, van Oosterhout C (2007b) The impact of parasites on the life history evolution of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): the effects of host size on parasite virulence. Int J Parasitol 37:1449–1458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carvalho GR, Shaw PW, Magurran AE, Seghers BH (1991) Marked genetic divergence revealed by allozymes among populations of the guppy Poecilia reticulata (Poeciliidae) in Trinidad. Biol J Linn Soc 42:389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eizaguirre C, Lenz TL, Traulsen A, Milinksi M (2009) Speciation accelerated and stabilized by pleiotropic major histocompatibility complex immunogenes. Ecol Lett 12:5–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Figueroa F, Mayer WE, Sultmann H, O’hUigin C, Tichy H, Satta Y, Takezaki N, Takahata N, Klein J (2000) MHC class II B gene evolution in east african cichlid fishes. Immunogenetics 51:557–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fraser BA, Ramnarine IW, Neff BD (2009) Selection at the MHC class IIB locus across guppy (Poecilia reticulata) populations. Heredity. doi:10.1038/hdy2009.99
  7. Houde AE (1997) Sexual selection and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  8. Kania P, Larsen TB, Ingerslev HC, Buchmann K (2007) Baltic salmon activates immune relevant genes in fin tissue when responding to Gyrodactylus salaris infection. Dis Aquat Org 76:81–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein J (1990) The natural history of the major histocompatibility complex. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindenstrøm T, Secombes CJ, Buchmann K (2004) Expression of immune response genes in rainbow trout skin induced by Gyrodactylus derjavini infections. Vet Immuol Immunopathol 97:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lyles AM (1990) Genetic variation and susceptibility to parasites: Poecilia reticulata infected with Gyrodactylus turnbulli. PhD thesis, Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. Magurran AE (1998) Population differentiation without speciation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin CH, Johnsen S (2007) A field test of the Hamilton-Zuk hypothesis in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1897–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McConnell TJ, Godwin UB, Norton SF, Nairn RS, Kazianis S, Morizot DC (1998) Identification and mapping of two divergent, unlinked major histocompatibillity complex class II B genes in xiphophorus fishes. Genetics 149:1921–1934PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller KM, Kaukinen KH, Beacham TD, Withler RE (2001) Geographic heterogeneity in natural selection on an MHC locus in sockeye salmon. Genetica 111:237–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ono H, O’hUigin C, Vincek V, Klein J (1993) Exon–intron organization of fish major histocompatibility complex class II B genes. Immunogenetics 38:223–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ottová E, Šimková A, Morand S (2007) The role of major histocompatibility complex diversity in vigour of fish males (Abramis brama L.) and parasite selection. Biol J Linn Soc 90:525–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pitcher TE, Neff BD (2006) MHC class IIB alleles contribute to additive and nonadditive genetic effects on survival in Chinook salmon. Mol Ecol 15:2357–2365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Roberts RJ, Smail DA (2001) Laboratory methods. In: Roberts RJ (ed) Fish pathology, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders, London, pp 380–412Google Scholar
  20. Schad J, Ganzhorn JU, Sommer S (2005) Parasite burden and constitution of major histocompatibility complex in the malagasy mouse lemus, Microcebus murinus. Evolution 59:439–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott ME (1985) Dynamics of challenge infections of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis Turnbull (Monogenea) on guppies. J Fish Dis 8:495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott ME, Anderson RM (1984) The population dynamics of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis (Monogenea) within laboratory populations of the fish host Poecilia reticulata. Parasitology 89:159–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Suk HY, Neff BD (2009) Microsatellite genetic differentiation among populations of the Trinidadian guppy. Heredity 102:425–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. van Oosterhout (2009) A new theory of MHC evolution: beyond selection on the immune genes. Proc R Soc B 276:657–665Google Scholar
  25. van Oosterhout C, Joyce DA, Cummings SM, Blais J, Barson NJ, Ramnarine IW, Mohammed RS, Persad N, Cable J (2006) Balancing selection, random genetic drift, and genetic variation at the major histocompatibility complex in two wild populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 60:2562–2574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. van Oosterhout C, Mohammed RS, Hansen H, Archard GA, McMullan M, Weese DJ, Cable J (2007a) Selection by parasites in spate conditions in wild Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Int J Parasitol 37:805–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. van Oosterhout C, Smith AM, Hänfling B, Ramnarine IW, Mohammed RS, Cable J (2007b) The guppy as a conservation model: implications of parasitism and inbreeding for reintroduction success. Conserv Biol 21:1573–1583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. van Oosterhout C, Potter R, Wright H, Cable J (2008) Gyro-scope: an individual-based computer model to forecast gyrodactylid infections on fish hosts. Int J Parasitol 38:541–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wegner KM, Kalbe M, Kurtz J, Reusch TBH, Milinski M (2003) Parasite selection for immunogenetic optimality. Science 301:1343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fraser BA, Neff BD (in review) Additive and non-additive effects on fitness measures in the guppyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations