Genetica

, 129:273 | Cite as

A simple chromosomal marker can reliably distinguishes Poncirus from Citrus species

  • A. C. Brasileiro-Vidal
  • J. A. dos Santos-Serejo
  • W. dos S. Soares Filho
  • M. Guerra
Original Paper

Abstract

Several chromosome types have been recognized in Citrus and related genera by chromomycin A3 (CMA) banding patterns and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). They can be used to characterize cultivars and species or as markers in hybridization and backcrossing experiments. In the present work, characterization of six cultivars of P. trifoliata (“Barnes”, “Fawcett”, “Flying Dragon”, “Pomeroy”, “Rubidoux”, “USDA”) and one P. trifoliata × C. limonia hybrid was performed by sequential analyses of CMA banding and FISH using 5S and 45S rDNA as probes. All six cultivars showed a similar CMA+ banding pattern with the karyotype formula 4B + 8D + 6F. The capital letters indicate chromosomal types: B, a chromosome with one telomeric and one proximal band; D, with only one telomeric band; F, without bands. In situ hybridization labeling was also similar among cultivars. Three chromosome pairs displayed a closely linked set of 5S and 45S rDNA sites, two of them co-located with the proximal band of the B type chromosomes (B/5S-45S) and the third one co-located with the terminal band of a D pair (D/5S-45S). The B/5S-45S chromosome has never been found in any citrus accessions investigated so far. Therefore, this B chromosome can be used as a marker to recognize the intergeneric Poncirus × Citrus hybrids. The intergeneric hybrid analyzed here displayed the karyotype formula 4B + 8D + 6F, with two chromosome types B/5S-45S and two D/5S-45S. The karyotype formula and the presence of two B/5S-45S chromosomes clearly indicate that the plant investigated is a symmetric hybrid. It also demonstrates the suitability of karyotype analyses to differentiate zygotic embryos or somatic cell fusions involving trifoliate orange germplasm.

Keywords

Chromosome Citrus CMA FISH Poncirus rDNA 

References

  1. Befu M, Kitajima A, Hasegawa K (2001) Chromosome composition of some Citrus species and cultivars based on the chromomycin A (3) (CMA) banding patterns. J Hort Sci 70:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Befu M, Kitajima A, Hasegawa K (2002) Classification of the Citrus chromosomes with same types of chromomycin A banding patterns. J Hort Sci 71:394–400Google Scholar
  3. Befu M, Kitajima A, Ling YX, Hasegawa K (2000) Classification of ‘Tosa – Buntan’ pummelo (Citrus grandis [L.] Osb.), ‘Washington’ navel orange (C. sinensis [L.] Osb.) and trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata [L.] Raf.) chromosomes using young leaves. J Hort Sci 69:22–28Google Scholar
  4. Carvalho R, Soares Filho WS, Brasileiro-Vidal AC, Guerra M (2005) The relationships among lemons, limes and citron: a chromosomal comparison. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:276–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornélio MTMN, Figueirôa ARS, Santos KGB, Carvalho R, Soares Filho WS, Guerra M (2003) Chromosomal relationships among cultivars of Citrus reticulata Blanco, its hybrids and related species. Plant Syst Evol 240:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubcovsky J, Dvořák J (1995) Ribosomal-RNA multigene loci-nomads of the Triticeae genomes. Genetics 140:1367–1377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fang DQ, Roose ML, Krueger RR, Federici CT (1977) Fingerprinting trifoliate orange germ plasm accessions with isoenzymes, RFLPs, and inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Theor Appl Genet 95:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FAOSTAT (2005) Agriculture data. Available at http://www.faostat.fao.org. Accessed: 27 June 2005Google Scholar
  9. Guerra M (1993) Cytogenetics of Rutaceae. V. High chromosomal variability in Citrus species revealed by CMA/DAPI staining. Heredity 71:234–241Google Scholar
  10. Guerra M, Pedrosa A, Silva AEB, Cornélio MTM, Santos KGB, Soares Filho WS (1997) Chromosome number and secondary constriction variation in 51 accessions of a Citrus germplasm bank. Brazil J Genet 20:489–496Google Scholar
  11. Guerra M, Santos KGB, Silva AEB, Ehrendorfer F (2000) Heterochromatin banding patterns in Rutaceae-Aurantioideae – a case of parallel chromosomal evolution. Am J Bot 87:735–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang D, Wu W, Lu L (2004) Microdissection and molecular manipulation of single chromosomes in woody fruit trees with small chromosomes using pomelo (Citrus grandis) as a model. II. Cloning of resistance gene analogs from single chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 108:1371–1377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kakeda K, Fukui K, Yamagata H (1991) Heterochromatic differentiation in barley chromosomes revealed by C- and N-banding techniques. Theor Appl Genet 81:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan IA, Roose ML (1998) Frequency and characteristics of nucellar and zygotic seedlings in three cultivars of trifoliate orange. J Am Soc Hort Sci 113:105–110Google Scholar
  15. Leitch IJ, Heslop-Harrison JS (1992) Physical mapping of the 18S-5.8S-26S rRNA genes in barley by in situ hybridization. Genome 35:1013–1018Google Scholar
  16. Li D, Zhang X (2002) Physical localization of the 18S-5.8S-26S rDNA and sequence analysis of ITS regions in Thinopyrum ponticum (Poaceae: Triticeae): implications for concerted evolution. Ann Bot 90:445–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li D, Yanyan RY, Zhang X (2004) Distribution of the 18S-5.8S-26S rDNA loci and heterogeneity of nuclear ITS regions in Thinopyrum intermedium (Poaceae: Triticeae). Acta Bot Sin 46:1234–1241Google Scholar
  18. Mastenbroek I, de Wet JMJ (1983) Chromosome C-banding of Zea mays and its closest relatives. Can J Genet Cytol 25:203–209Google Scholar
  19. Miranda M, Ikeda F, Endo T, Moriguchi T, Omura M (1997) Comparative analysis on the distribution of heterochromatin in Citrus, Poncirus and Fortunella chromosome. Chromosome Res 5:86–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moscone EA, Matzke MA, Matzke AJM (1996) The use of combined FISH/GISH in conjunction with DAPI counterstaining to identify chromosomes containing transgenes inserts in amphidiploid tobacco. Chromosoma 105:231–236Google Scholar
  21. Mukai Y, Endo TR, Gill BS (1991) Physical mapping of the 18S.26S rRNA multigene family in common wheat: identification of a new locus. Chromosoma 100:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neves N, Delgado M, Silva M, Caperta A, Morais-Cecílio L, Viegas W (2005) Ribosomal DNA heterochromatin in plants. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:104–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pedersen C, Linde-Laursen IB (1994) Chromosomal locations of four minor rDNA loci and a marker microsatellite sequence in barley. Chromosome Res 2:65–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pedrosa A, Schweizer D, Guerra M (2000) Cytological heterozygosity and the hybrid origin of sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck. Theor Appl Genet 100:361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roose ML, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS (1998) The chromosomes of Citrus and Poncirus species and hybrids: identification of characteristic chromosomes and physical mapping of rDNA loci using in situ hybridization and fluorochrome banding. J Hered 89:83–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schäfer G, Bastianel M, Dornelles ALC (2001) Citriculture rootstocks in use. Ci Rural 31:723–733Google Scholar
  27. Schweizer D (1981). Counterstain-enhanced chromosome banding. Hum Genet 57:1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Shang XM, Nguyen HT, Jackson RC (1989) Heterochromatin differentiation and phylogenetic relationship of the A genomes in diploid and polyploidy wheats. Theor Appl Genet 77:84–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shubert I, Wobus U (1996) In situ hybridization confirms jumping nucleolus organizing regions in Allium. Chromosoma 92:143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spiegel-Roy P, Goldschmidt EE (1996) Biology of citrus. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Wanzenböck E-M, Schöfer C, Schweizer D, Bachmair A (1997) Ribosomal transcription units integrated via T-DNA transformation associate with nucleolus and do not require upstream repeat sequences for activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 11:1007–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamamoto M., Tominaga S (2003) High chromosomal variability of mandarins (Citrus spp.) revealed by CMA banding. Euphytica 129:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Brasileiro-Vidal
    • 1
  • J. A. dos Santos-Serejo
    • 2
  • W. dos S. Soares Filho
    • 2
  • M. Guerra
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Botânica, Centro de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Embrapa Mandioca e FruticulturaCruz das AlmasBrazil

Personalised recommendations