Genetica

, Volume 122, Issue 3, pp 269–276 | Cite as

Cytogenetic studies on Metasequoia glyptostroboides, a living fossil species

  • Zican He
  • Jianqiang Li
  • Qing Cai
  • Xiaodong Li
  • Hongwen Huang
Article

Abstract

The chromosome morphology and meiotic pairing behavior in the pollen mother cells (PMCs) of Metasequoia glyptostroboides were investigated. The results showed that: (1) The chromosome number of the PMCs was 2n=22. (2) The PMCs developed in the successive manner, and the nucleoids in the dynamic development were similar to those of the other gymnosperms. (3) At prophase, most of the chromosomes were unable to be identified distinctively because the chromosomes were long and tangled together. The chromosome segments were paired non-synchronously. At pachytene, the interstitial or terminal regions of some bivalents did not form synapsis and the paired chromosomes showed difference in sizes, indicating that there were structure differences between the homologous chromosomes. (4) At diakinesis, the ring bivalents showed complicated configurations due to the differences in location and number of chiasmata. In addition, there were cross-linked bivalents. (5) At metaphase I, the chromosome configuration of each cell was 8.2II 0 + 1.1II + 1.3II + + 0.8I. Most of the chromosomes were ring bivalents, but some were cross-linked bivalents, rod bivalents, or univalents. (6) 15\% PMCs at anaphase I and 22\% PMCs at anaphase II presented chromosome bridges, chromosome fragments, micronuclei, and lagging chromosomes. Twenty seven percent microspores finally moved into one to three micronuclei. Twenty five percent pollens were abortive. The results indicated that the observed individual of M. glyptostroboideswas probably a parpcentric inversion heterozygote, and there were structural and behavioral differences between the homologous chromosomes. The chromosomal aberration of M. glyptostroboidesmay play an important role in the evolution of this relict species, which is known as a living fossil. Further evidence is needed to test whether the differences between homologous chromosomes were due to hybridization.

chromosome configuration and behavior ecological adaptation evolution meiosis Metasequoia glyptostroboidesHu et Cheng 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartholomew, B., D.E. Boufford & S.A. Spongberg, 1983. MetaSequoia glyptostrobodes–Its status in central China in 1980. J. Arnod Arboretum 64: 105–128.Google Scholar
  2. Chaney, R.W., 1948. The bearing of the living MetaSequoia on problems of Tertiary Pleobotany. Proc. Natural Acad. Sci. 34: 503–515.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, R.Y., W.Q. Song & X.L. Li, 1979. A new method for preparing mitotic chromosomes from plant. Acta Botanica Sinica 21(3): 296–297 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, W.C. & C.H. Chu, 1949. Forest present of MetaSequoia glyptostrobodes in Lichuan, Hubei. Sci. China 31(3): 73–80 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  5. Chu, K.L. & W.S. Cooper, 1950. An ecological reconnaissance in the native home of MetaSequoia glyptostroboides. Ecology 31: 260—278.Google Scholar
  6. Feng, J.H. & S.X. Xu, 2002. Chromosome spatial distribution in wheat root tip cell during mitosis, pp.160–166 in Advances in Chromosome Sciences, Vol.1, edited by K. Fukui & Z.Y. Xin, China Agri. Sci. and Tech. Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
  7. Finch, R.A., J.B. Smith & M.D. Bennett, 1981. Hordeum and Secale mitotic genomes lie apart in a hybrid. J. Cell Sci. 52: 391–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Florin, R., 1963. The distribution of conifer and taxad genera in time and space. Acta Horti. Berg. 20: 121–312.Google Scholar
  9. Fulling, E.H., 1976. MetaSequoia: fossil and living. Bot. Rev. 42: 215–315.Google Scholar
  10. Hong, D.Y., 1990. Plant cytotaxonomy, pp. 38–42, Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  11. Hu, H.H. & W.C. Cheng, 1948. On the new family Metase-quoiaceae and on MetaSequoia glyptostroboides, a living species of the genus MetaSequoia found in Szechuan and Hupeh. Bulletin Fan Memorial Institute of Biology New Series 1(2): 153–161.Google Scholar
  12. Hu, H.H., 1950. MetaSequoia and its history. Chinese J. Botany 5(1): 9–13 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  13. Levan, A., K.Fredga & A.A. Sandberg, 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on Chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201–220.Google Scholar
  14. Li, J.H., 1999. Metaseqoia: an overview of its phylogeny, reproductive biology, and ecotypic variation. Arnoldia 58(4)/59(1): 54–59.Google Scholar
  15. Li, J.H. & J.D. Ban, 1989. The water r communities endemic to China. J. Henan Normal Univ.(Nat.Sci.) 4: 49–55 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  16. Li, L.C., 1986. Karyotype study of Metasequoia glyptostrobo-ides. J. Wuhan Bot. Res. 4(1): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  17. Li, L.C., 1990. Two evolutionary lines of Taxodiaceae. Acta Phytotaxonom. Sin. 28(1): 1–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  18. Li, X.D., H.W Huang & J.Q. Li, 2003. Genetic diversity of the relict plant MetaSequoia glyptostroboides. Biodivers. Sci. 11(2): 100–108 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  19. Liu, Y.J., C.S. Li & Y.F. Wang, 1999. Study on fossil MetaSequoia from north-east China and their taxonomic implications. Botanical J. Linnean Soc. 130: 267–297.Google Scholar
  20. Miki, S., 1941. On the change of.ora in Eastern Asia since Tertiary Period (I): The clay or lignite beds.ora in Japan with special reference to the Pinus trifolia beds in Central Hondo Jap. J. Bot. 11: 237–303, pl. 5.Google Scholar
  21. Nagele, R., T.Freeman, J.Fazekas, K.M. Lee, Z.Thomson & H.Y. Lee, 1998. Chromosome spatial order in human cells: Evidance for early origin and faithful propagation. Chro-mosome 107: 330–338.Google Scholar
  22. Schlabaum, S.E., T.Tsuchiya & L.C. Johnson, 1984. The chromosome and relations of MetaSequoia and Sequoia: an update. J. Arnold Arboretum 65(2): 251–254.Google Scholar
  23. Stebbins, G.L., 1948. The chromosomes and relationships of MetaSequoia and Sequoia. Science 108: 95–98.Google Scholar
  24. Stebbins, G.L., 1971. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  25. Tanaka, R., 1971. Types of resting nuclei in Orchidaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 84: 118–121.Google Scholar
  26. Tanaka, R., 1977. Recent karyotype studies, in Plant Cytology, edited by K.Ogawa, et al., Asakura Shoten, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, X.Q., Y.P. Zou & D.M. Zhang, 1997. Genetic diversity analysis by RAPD in Cathaya argyrophylla Chun et Kuang. Sci. China (C) 40(2): 1945–1951.Google Scholar
  28. Yu, Y.F., 1995. Origin, evolution and distribution of the Taxodiaceae. Acta Phytotaxonom. Sin. 33(4): 362–389 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  29. Zhang, Z.M., C.J. Ji, X.Yang & Z.L. Li, 1999. Cell divisions during microsporogenesis and development of the male gametophyte in Ginkgo biloba. Acta Bot. Sin. 41(5): 479–483.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zican He
    • 1
  • Jianqiang Li
    • 1
  • Qing Cai
    • 1
  • Xiaodong Li
    • 1
  • Hongwen Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Wuhan Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesPRChina

Personalised recommendations