Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 84, Issue 6, pp 1429–1445 | Cite as

Conservation and people’s livelihoods in Colombia

  • Luis Sanchez-AyalaEmail author
  • Alexandra Areiza-Tapias
Article
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

This paper seeks to focus on the way in which land transformation related to the grabbing process are directly involved in people’s livelihoods and life projects. We use the term territorial grabbing instead of green grabbing (or just land grabbing), because even though the case that we illustrate in our work can be describe as a green grab, we make a call for the necessity of a comprehensive analysis of the socio-spatial implications that polices such as the governmental environmental conservation agenda can implicate for individuals and communities in terms of impacts, influences, and [re]significations of their territories and territorialities. Therefore, our objective is to go beyond the discussion on the appropriation of land and resources for environmental purposes (and therefore the discussion of land dynamics in relation to globalization, foreign investment, markets liberalization, violence, and control) to bring also into the debate the diverse socio-spatial implications and meanings that create a geographical imagination capable of having profound influences on the way in which people and groups understand their place in the world.

Keywords

Territorial grabbing Green grabbing Landscape change Colombia Latin America 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Universidad de los Andes and the Alexander von Humboldt Institute.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

Our work involved human participants. Therefore, we declare that informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Likewise, all procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethical Committee of the Universidad de los Andes, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Borras, S., Kay, C., Gómez, S., & Wilkinson, J. (2012). Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies,33(4), 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borras, S., Kay, S., Gómez, S., & Wilkinson, J. (2013). Acaparamiento de tierras y acumulación capitalista: aspectos clave en América Latina. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios Agrario,38, 75–103.Google Scholar
  3. Cernea, M. (1999). The economics of involuntary resettlement: Questions and challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corson, C., & MacDonald, K. (2012). Enclosing the global commons: The convention on biological diversity and green grabbing. Journal of Peasant Studies,39(2), 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cotula, L., Dyer, N., & Vermeulen, S. (2008). Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor people’s access to land. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  6. Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Edelman, M., Oya, C., & Borras, S. (2013). Global land grabs: Historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories. Third World Quarterly,34(9), 1517–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies,39(2), 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fajardo, D. (1996). Orinoquía: Colonización, frontera y estructuración territorial. Bogotá, DC: Fondo FEN.Google Scholar
  10. FAO. (2000). The state of food and agriculture 2000. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  11. Filer, C. (2012). Why green grabs don’t work in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Peasant Studies,39, 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gómez, C., Sánchez-Ayala, L., & Vargas, G. (2015). Armed conflict, land grabs and primitive accumulation in Colombia: Micro processes, macro trends and the puzzles in between. Journal of Peasant Studies,42(2), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grajales, J. (2011). The rifle and the title: Paramilitary violence, land grab and land control in Colombia. Journal of Peasant Studies,38(4), 771–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grajales, J. (2013). State involvement, land grabbing and counter-insurgency in Colombia. Development and Change,44(2), 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, D., Hirsh, P., & Li, T. (2011). Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in South East Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  16. Li, T. (2014). What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,39, 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McMichael, P. (2012). The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies,39(3–4), 681–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mejía, M. (1999). Economic dimensions of urban resettlement: Experiences from Latin America. In M. Cernea (Ed.), The economics of involuntary resettlement: Questions and challenges (pp. 147–188). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  19. Paasi, A. (2003). Territory. In A. John, M. Katharyne, T. Gerard (Eds.), En a companion to political geography (pp. 109–120). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia. (Noviembre 2004). Documento de Declaratoria para la Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales.Google Scholar
  21. Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia, Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas. http://www.parquesnacionales.gov.co.
  22. Peluso, N. L. (2012). What’s nature got to do with it? A situated historical perspective on socionatural commodities. Development and Change,42, 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peluso, N., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasants Studies,38(4), 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robertson, B., & Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (2010). Global land acquisition: Neo-colonialism or development opportunity? Food Security,2, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saeed, H., & Parmentier, S. (2017). When rabbits are in charge of carrots: Land grabbing, transitional justice and economic-state crime in Afghanistan. State Crime Journal,6(1), 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sánchez-Ayala, L., & Arango-López, C. (2016). Geografías de la Movilidad: Perspectivas desde Colombia. Bogotá: Uniandes.Google Scholar
  27. Vidal, J. (2008). The great green land grab. The Guardian, 13 de febrero de 2008. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/feb/13/conservation.
  28. Zoomers, A. (2010). Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: Seven processes driving the current global land grab. Journal of Peasant Studies,37, 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de los AndesBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Alexander von Humboldt InstituteBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations