Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 471–481 | Cite as

Encounters in the valley: love and emotions in microprocesses of gentrification in depopulated rural areas

  • Angel PaniaguaEmail author
Article
  • 288 Downloads

Abstract

Geography based on feelings and affection is an emergent research area in the rural sphere. Rural areas have undergone processes of social change associated with the movement of people to them. This paper examines the processes of repopulation and social change in depopulated areas using a qualitative methodology based on biographical narrations. The aim is to frame the value of feelings and emotion towards another person in a rural setting of encounter. Therefore, the paper will primarily assess the emotions between two people in building a life in a particular rural place. This contrasts with the more customary approach based on the emotional relationship between individuals and the rural environment as a factor explaining moves to rural areas. The paper will analyse six biographical cases involving women who have moved to/in remote and depopulated areas for love. It concludes that inter-personal feelings are an area that has been under-explored in rural geography yet they may explain mobility processes on a micro scale.

Keywords

Encounters Qualitative methods Feelings Geography Spain 

References

  1. Bock, B., & Buller, H. J. (2013). Healthy, happy and humane: Evidence in farm animal welfare policy. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(3), 390–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bondi, L., Davidson, J., & Smith, M. (2001). Introduction: Geography’s ‘emotional turn’. In J. Davidson, L. Bondi, & M. Smith (Eds.), Emotional geographies (pp. 1–18). London: Ahsgate.Google Scholar
  3. Boyle, P., & Halfacree, K. (1993). The challenge facing migration research: The case for a biographical approach. Progress in Human Geography, 17(3), 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyle, P., Halfacree, K., & Robinson, V. (1998). Exploring contemporary migration. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, M. P. (2000). Closet space: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Castree, N. (2011). Nature. Part I. In J. A. Agnew & J. S. Duncan (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to human geography (pp. 179–196). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Cloke, P. (2006). Conceptualizing rurality. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 18–29). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cloke, P., Cooke, P., Cursons, J., Milbourne, P., & Widdowfield, R. (2000). Ethics, reflexivity and research: Encounters with homeless people. Ethics, Place and Environment, 3(2), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cloke, P., Phillips, M., & Thrift, N. (1995). The new middle class and the social construction of rural living. In T. Butler & M. Savage (Eds.), Social change and the middle classes (pp. 220–238). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  10. Conradson, D., & Mackey, D. (2007). Translocal subjectivities: Mobility, connection, emotion. Mobilities, 2(2), 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crang, M. A. (2007). Doing ethnographies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunn, K. (2003). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 50–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goodman, M., Goodman, D., & Redclift, M. (2010). Introduction: Situating consumption, space and place. In M. Goodman, D. Goodman, & M. Redclift (Eds.), Consuming space. Placing consumption in perspective (pp. 1–40). Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Gorman-Murray, A., Pini, B., & Bryant, L. (2012). Introduction. Geographies of ruralities and sexualities. In A. Gorman-Murray, B. Pini, & L. Bryant (Eds.), Sexuality, rurality and geography (pp. 1–20). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. Greenhough, B. (2010). Vitalist geographies: Life and the more-than-human. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non representational theories and geography (pp. 37–54). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Halfacree, K. (1994). The importance of ‘the rural’ in the constitution of counterurbanisation: Evidence from England in the 1980s. Sociologia Ruralis, 34(2–3), 164–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halfacree, K. (1997). Contrasting roles for the post-productivist countryside. A postmodern perspective on counterurbanisation. In P. Cloke & J. Little (Eds.), Contested countryside cultures (pp. 70–93). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Halfacree, K. (2003). Landscape of rurality. Rural others/other rural. In I. Robertson & P. Richards (Eds.), Studying cultural landscape (pp. 141–164). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  19. Hay, I. (2003). Qualitative research methods in human geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Herman, A. (2015). Enchanting resilience: Relations of care and people-place connections in agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 42(December), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoelcher, S. (2011). Place. Part II. In J. A. Agnew & J. S. Duncan (Eds.), The Willey-Blackwell companion to human geography (pp. 245–260). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoggart, K., Lees, L., & Davies, A. (2002). Researching human geography. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  23. Holloway, L. (2002). Smallholding, hobby-farming, and commercial farming: Ethical identities and the production of farming spaces. Environment and Planning A, 34(11), 2055–2070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iversen, I., & Jacobsen, J. S. (2016). Migrant tourism entrepreneurs in rural Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 16(4), 484–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kontuly, T. (1998). Contrasting the counterurbanisation experience in European nations. In P. Boyle & K. Halfacree (Eds.), Migration into rural areas. Theories and issues (pp. 41–60). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Leitner, H. (2012). Spaces of encounters: Immigration, race, class, and the politics of belonging in small-town America. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(4), 828–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Limb, M., & Dwyer, C. (Eds.). (2001). Qualitative methodologies for geographers. Issues and debates. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  28. Little, J. (2003). ‘Riding the rural love train’: Heterosexuality and the rural community. Sociologia Ruralis, 43(4), 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Little, J. (2008). Nature, fear and rurality. In R. Pain & J. Smith (Eds.), Fear: Critical geopolitics and everyday life (pp. 87–97). Abdington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Little, J., & Panelli, R. (2007). ‘Outback romance? A reading of nature and heterosexuality in rural Australia. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(3), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthews, H., Taylor, M., Sherwood, K., Tucker, F., & Limb, M. (2000). Growing-up in the countryside: Children and the rural idyll. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(12), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milbourne, P. (2007). Re-populating rural studies: Migrations, movements and mobilities. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(3), 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mostafanezhad, M., & Hannam, K. (2014). Introducing moral encounters in tourism. In M. Mostafanezhad & K. Hannam (Eds.), moral encounters in tourism (pp. 1–13). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Paniagua, A. (2002a). Counterurbanization and new social class in rural Spain: The environmental and rural dimension revisited. Scottish Geographical Journal, 118(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paniagua, A. (2002b). Urban-rural migration, tourism entrepreneurs and rural restructuring in Spain. Tourism Geographies. International Journal on Space, Place and Environment, 4(4), 349–372.Google Scholar
  36. Paniagua, A. (2008). The environmental dimension in the constitution of new social groups in an extremely depopulated rural area of Spain (Soria). Land Use Policy, 25(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips, M. (2004). Other geographies of gentrification. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Price, L., & Evans, N. (2006). From ‘good as gold’ to ‘gold diggers’: Farming women and the survival of British family farming. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4), 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riley, M. (2011). ‘Letting them go’—Agricultural retirement and human-livestock relations. Geoforum, 42(1), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sibley, D. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Sibley, D. (2006). Inclusions/exclusions in rural space. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. H. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 401–410). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, M. (2009). On ‘Being’ moved by nature: Geography, emotion and environmental ethics. In M. Smith, J. Davidson, L. Cameron, & L. Bondi (Eds.), Emotion, place and culture (pp. 219–230). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, M., Davidson, J., Cameron, L., & Bondi, L. (2009). Introduction. Geography and emotion—emerging constellations. In M. Smith, J. Davidson, L. Cameron, & L. Bondi (Eds.), Emotion, place and culture (pp. 1–20). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. Stockdale, A., & Catney, G. (2014). A life course perspective on urban-rural migration: The importance of the local conext. Population, Space and Place, 20(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory. Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Valentine, G. (1997). A safe place to grow up? Parenting, perceptions of children’s safety and the rural idyll. Journal of Rural Studies, 13(2), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vannini, P., & Taggart, J. (2013). Voluntary simplicity, involuntary complexities, and the pull of remove: The radical ruralities of off-grid lifestyles. Environment and Planning A, 45(2), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Von Reichert, Ch., Cromartie, J. B., & Arthun, R. O. (2014). Reasons for returning and not returning to rural US communities. The Professional Geographer, 66(1), 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walsh, K. (2012). Emotion and migration: British transnationals in Dubai. Environment and Planning D, 30(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist returns: Practicing cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 2006(13), 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Willis, K. D. (2010). Social collisions. In S. J. Smith, R. Pain, S. A. Marston, & J. P. Jones III (Eds.), Social geographies (pp. 139–153). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Woods, M. (2011). Rural. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Woods, M., Anderson, J., Guilbert, S., & Watkin, S. (2012). ‘The country (side) is angry’: Emotion and explanation in protest mobilization. Social and Cultural Geography, 13(6), 567–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Woodward, K., & Lea, J. (2010). Geographies of affect. In S. J. Smith, R. Pain, S. A. Marston, & J. P. Jones III (Eds.), Social geographies (pp. 154–175). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Wynne, D. (1998). Leisure, lifestyle and the new middle class. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Yarwood, R., & Evans, N. (1998). New places for “Old Spots”: The changing geographies of domestic livestock animals. Society and Animals, 6(2), 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yarwood, R., & Tyrrell, N. (2012). Why children’s geographies? Geography, 97(3), 124–128.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IPP-CSICMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations