Geography and postgenomics: how space and place are the new DNA
- 322 Downloads
For many geographers, postgenomics is a relatively new perspective on biological causality. It is a non-dualistic way to conceptualize DNA, genes and environment. It also presents an opportunity for a broad critical engagement with biology through geography’s insights into socionature and the fallacies of spatial inference. In postgenomics, mapping of the spatial and temporal contexts and circumstances surrounding DNA, rather than DNA sequence alone, has become prioritized. Consequently, scientific and economic value in postgenomics accrues through the enclosure and mapping of the ‘omes’. These include the more familiar epigenome and microbiome, but also the interactome, the phenome, and the exposome among many others. The omes represent the cartographic translation of biological spatialities that modify the outcomes of DNA sequence from within as well as from outside of human bodies. In this article, we show how postgenomics leverages this omic ontologicalization of space and puts it to productive use. Drawing upon recent studies of the human microbiome, we illustrate how problematic geographies of difference arise through the way this omic mapping unfolds.
KeywordsPostgenomics Geography Cartography DNA Microbiome
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Blaser, M. J., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Contreras, M., Magris, M., Hidalgo, G., Estrada, I., et al. (2013). Distinct cutaneous bacterial assemblages in a sampling of South American Amerindians and US residents. The ISME Journal: Multidisciplinary Journal of Microbial Ecology, 7(1), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clark, N. (2011). Inhuman nature: Sociable life on a dynamic planet. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest witness at second millennium: Female man meets oncomouse: Feminism and technoscience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
- Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the spatial fix. Geographische Revue, 2(3), 23–31.Google Scholar
- Hird, M. (2017). Burial and resurrection in the Anthropocene: Infrastructures of waste. In P. Harvey, C. B. Jensen, & A. Morita (Eds.), Infrastructures and social complexity a companion. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lederberg, J., & Mccray, A. (2001). Ome sweet omics—A genealogical treasury of words. The Scientist, 17(7), 8.Google Scholar
- Levin, N. (2014a). What’s being translated in translational research? Making and making sense of data between the laboratory and the clinic. Technoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 5(1), 91–114.Google Scholar
- Levin, N. (2014b). Making up “persons” in personalized medicine with metabolomics. Somatosphere. http://somatosphere.net/2014/02/making-up-persons-in-personalized-medicine-with-metabolomics.html. Accessed 17 March 2015.
- Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, J. N. (2012). Matchmaking mechanisms: Collaborative arrangements in proteomics and bioinformatics. In J. N. Parker, B. Penders, & N. Vermeulen (Eds.), Collaboration in the new life sciences (pp. 180–199). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Obregon-Tito, A. J. (2013). Metagenomics and social inclusion in Peru. Norman: University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
- Pollan, M. (2013). Say hello to the 100 trillion bacteria that make up your microbiome. The New York Times, May 15.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R., Gligorov, N., & Schwab, A. P. (2013). The human microbiome: Ethical, legal and social concerns. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rose, H., & Rose, S. P. R. (2012). Genes, cells, and brains: The promethean promises of the new biology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Smith, N. (2009). Nature as accumulation strategy Socialist Register, 43. http://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5856#.UdJTB5y3a4Y.
- Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Velasquez-Manoff, M. (2012). An epidemic of absence: A new way of understanding allergies and autoimmune diseases. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Waddington, C. H. (1952). The epigenetics of birds. Cambridge England: University Press.Google Scholar
- Yatsunenko, T., Rey, F. E., Manary, M. J., Trehan, I., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Contreras, M., et al. (2012). Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature, 486(7402), 222–227.Google Scholar
- Zuk, M. (2013). Paleofantasy: What evolution really tells us about sex, diet, and how we live. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar