Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 80, Issue 4, pp 449–461 | Cite as

Data-driven geography

  • Harvey J. Miller
  • Michael F. Goodchild
Article

Abstract

The context for geographic research has shifted from a data-scarce to a data-rich environment, in which the most fundamental changes are not just the volume of data, but the variety and the velocity at which we can capture georeferenced data; trends often associated with the concept of Big Data. A data-driven geography may be emerging in response to the wealth of georeferenced data flowing from sensors and people in the environment. Although this may seem revolutionary, in fact it may be better described as evolutionary. Some of the issues raised by data-driven geography have in fact been longstanding issues in geographic research, namely, large data volumes, dealing with populations and messy data, and tensions between idiographic versus nomothetic knowledge. The belief that spatial context matters is a major theme in geographic thought and a major motivation behind approaches such as time geography, disaggregate spatial statistics and GIScience. There is potential to use Big Data to inform both geographic knowledge-discovery and spatial modeling. However, there are challenges, such as how to formalize geographic knowledge to clean data and to ignore spurious patterns, and how to build data-driven models that are both true and understandable.

Keywords

Big data GIScience Spatial statistics Geographic knowledge discovery Geographic thought Time geography 

References

  1. Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired, 16, 07.Google Scholar
  2. Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association: LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batty, M. (2012). Smart cities, big data. Environment and Planning B, 39(2), 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, D. (2008). Web data predict flu. Nature, 456, 287–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr, N. (2013) The great forgetting. The Atlantic, pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
  6. Cetin, N., Nagel, K., Raney, B., & Voellmy, A. (2002). Large-scale multi-agent transportation simulations. Computer Physics Communications, 147(1–2), 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlton, M. (2008). Geographical Analysis Machine (GAM). In K. Kemp (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science (pp. 179–180). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Cresswell, T. (2013). Geographic thought: A critical introduction. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. DeLyser, D., & Sui, D. (2013). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative divide II: Inventive approaches to big data, mobile methods, and rhythmanalysis. Progress in Human Geography37(2), 293–305.Google Scholar
  10. Diplock, G. (1998). Building new spatial interaction models by using genetic programming and a supercomputer. Environment and Planning A, 30(10), 1893–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobson, J. E. (1983). Automated geography. The Professional Geographer, 35, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumbill, E. (2012). What is big data? An introduction to the big data landscape, http://strata.oreilly.com/2012/01/what-is-big-data.html. Last accessed 17 April 2014.
  13. Flake, G. W. (1998). The computational beauty of nature: computer explorations of fractals, chaos, complex systems, and adaptation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fotheringham, A. S. (1998). Trends in quantitative methods II: Stressing the computational. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Gahegan, M. (2000). On the application of inductive machine learning tools to geographical analysis. Geographical Analysis, 32(1), 113–139.Google Scholar
  17. Gahegan, M. (2009). Visual exploration and explanation in geography: Analysis with light. In H. J. Miller & J. Han (Eds.), Geographic data mining and knowledge discovery (2nd ed., pp. 291–324). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Gibbings, J. C. (2011). Dimensional analysis. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  21. Goodchild, M. F. (2004). GIScience, geography, form, and process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 709–714.Google Scholar
  22. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodchild, M. F., Egenhofer, M. J., Kemp, K. K., Mark, D. M., & Sheppard, E. (1999). Introduction to the Varenius project. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(8), 731–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodchild, M. F., & Li, L. (2012). Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1, 110–120. doi: 10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, M., & Shelton, T. (2013). Geography and the future of big data, big data and the future of geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guptill, S. C., & Morrison, J. L. (Eds.). (1995). Elements of spatial data quality. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 682–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hand, D. J. (1999). Discussion contribution on ‘data mining reconsidered: Encompassing and the general-to-specific approach to specification search’ by Hoover and Perez. Econometrics Journal, 2(2), 241–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hartshorne, R. (1939). The nature of geography: A critical survey of current thought in the light of the past. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
  30. Hey, T., Tansley S., & Tolle, K. (Eds.). (2009). The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery.Google Scholar
  31. Hoover, K. D., & Perez, S. J. (1999). Data mining reconsidered: Encompassing and the general-to-specific approach to specification search. Econometrics Journal, 2(2), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data and human geography: Opportunities, challenges and risks. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  34. Mayer-Schonberger, V., Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Google Scholar
  35. Merton, R. K. (1967). On sociological theories of the middle range. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), On theoretical sociology (pp. 39–72). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, H. J. (2007). Place-based versus people-based geographic information science. Geography Compass, 1(3), 503–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, H. J. (2010). The data avalanche is here. Shouldn’t we be digging? Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Leary, M. (2012). Eurovision statistics: post-semifinal update, Cold Hard Facts (May 23). Available: http://mewo2.com/nerdery/2012/05/23/eurovision-statistics-post-semifinal-update/. Accessed October 25, 2013.
  39. Openshaw, S. (1988). Building an automated modeling system to explore a universe of spatial interaction models. Geographical Analysis, 20(1), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Openshaw, S., Charlton, M., Wymer, C., & Craft, A. (1987). A Mark I geographical analysis machine for the automated analysis of point data sets. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1(4), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Openshaw, S., & Taylor, P. J. (1979). A million or so correlation coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In N. Wrigley (Ed.), Statistical methods in the social sciences (pp. 127–144). London: Pion.Google Scholar
  42. Preis, T., Moat, H. S., & Stanley, H. E. (2013). Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends. Scientific Reports, 3 (1684). doi: 10.1038/srep01684.
  43. Raymond, E. S. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  44. Schuurman, N. (2000). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography, 24(4), 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silver, N. (2012). The signal and the noise: Why most predictions failbut some don’t. Google Scholar
  46. Smith, N. (1992). History and philosophy of geography: Real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography, 16(2), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sui, D. (2004). GIS, cartography, and the “Third Culture”: Geographic imaginations in the computer age. Professional Geographer, 56(1), 62–72.Google Scholar
  48. Sui, D., & DeLyser, D. (2012). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm I: Hybrid geographies, the spatial turn, and volunteered geographic information (VGI). Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sui, D., & Goodchild, M. F. (2011). The convergence of GIS and social media: Challenges for GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(11), 1737–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sui, D., Goodchild, M. F., & Elwood, S. (2013). Volunteered geographic information, the exaflood, and the growing digital divide. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge (pp. 1–12). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  52. The Economist. (19 October 2013). Trouble at the lab, pp. 26–30.Google Scholar
  53. Townsend, A. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  54. Tsou, M. H., Yang, J. A., Lusher, D., Han, S., Spitzberg, B., Gawron, J. M., et al. (2013). Mapping social activities and concepts with social media (Twitter) and web search engines (Yahoo and Bing): a case study in 2012 US Presidential Election. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(4), 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waldrop, M. M. (1990). Learning to drink from a fire hose. Science, 248(4956), 674–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Warntz, W. (1989). Newton, the Newtonians, and the Geographia Generalis Varenii. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 79(2), 165–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watts, D. J. (2011). Everything is Obvious – Once You Know the Answer. United States of America: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  58. Weinberger, D. (2011). The machine that would predict the future, Scientific American, November 15, 2011. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-machine-that-would-predict.
  59. Zedner, L. (2010). Pre-crime and pre-punishment: a health warning. Criminal Justice Matters, 81(1), 24–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations