GeoJournal

, Volume 79, Issue 6, pp 705–719 | Cite as

Perceptions of environmental change in Moorea, French Polynesia: the importance of temporal, spatial, and scalar contexts

  • Barbara Louise Endemaño Walker
  • David López-Carr
  • Cheryl Chen
  • Kitty Currier
Article

Abstract

Pacific Islands are considered among the most vulnerable geographies and societies to the effects of climate change and variability (CCV). This study addresses the mismatch between global climate change narratives and local perceptions of environmental change in Moorea, French Polynesia. This study builds on CCV risk perception and adaptation research by analyzing how temporal and historical socio-economic, cultural, political, and ecological contexts shape local perceptions of environmental change among a sample of environmental stakeholders in Moorea. The data were collected prior to the widespread global narrative and social amplification of climate change risk and its particular impact on islands. As such, they offer an important portrait of environmental perceptions in French Polynesia prior to the influence of a circumscribed climate change narrative, which has since come to shape government and NGO responses to environmental change in the Pacific Island Countries and Territories. The data presented in this paper illustrate that perceptions of drivers and effects of environmental change and risk in Moorea are embedded in larger social processes of political economy and ecology, particularly related to contemporary environmental politics, contextualized within the histories of colonialism and tourism-led economic development. Integrating the complexity of local environmental risk perceptions into CCV policy will help to avoid maladaptation, social movements against CCV planning, and may help maximize government and donor investments.

Keywords

Climate change Risk perception Adaptation Political ecology Pacific Islands Moorea 

References

  1. Adam, T. C., Schmitt, R., Holbrook, S., Brooks, A., Edmunds, P., et al. (2011). Herbivory, connectivity, and ecosystem resilience: Response of a coral reef to a large-scale Perturbation. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23717. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023717.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, H., & Adger, W. N. (2013). Changing places: migration and adaptation to climate change. The Changing Environment for Human Security: New Agendas for Research, Policy, and Action. London: Routledge-Earthsan.Google Scholar
  3. Adger, W. N. (2010). Climate change, human well-being and insecurity. New Political Economy, 15(2), 275–292.Google Scholar
  4. Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N., & O’Brien, K. (2013). Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3(2), 112–117.Google Scholar
  5. Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., & Eriksen, S. (2004). New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Norwich: Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research. Technical Report 7.Google Scholar
  6. Adger, W. N., Eakin, H., & Winkels, A. (2009). Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(3), 150–157.Google Scholar
  7. Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Rockstro, J. (2005). Social ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309(5737), 1036–1039.Google Scholar
  8. Adjeroud, M., Michonneau, F., Edmunds, P. J., Chancerelle, Y., de Loma, T. L., Penin, L., et al. (2009). Recurrent disturbances, recovery trajectories, and resilience of coral assemblages on a South Central Pacific reef. Coral Reefs, 28(3), 775–780.Google Scholar
  9. Allison, E. H., Perry, A. L., Badjeck, M., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Conway, D., et al. (2009). Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 10(2), 173–196.Google Scholar
  10. Aubanel, A., Marquet, N., Colombani, J. M., & Salvat, B. (1999). Modifications of the shoreline in the Society Islands (French Polynesia). Ocean and Coastal Management, 42(5), 419–438.Google Scholar
  11. Avagliano, E., & Petit, J. N. (2009). Etat des Lieux sur les Enjeux du Changement Climatique en Polynésie Française. Papeete, French Polynesia: Ministère de l’Environnement, Direction de l’Environnement et UC Berkeley, Station Gump.Google Scholar
  12. Barnett, J. (2011). Dangerous climate change in the Pacific Islands: Food production and food security. Regional Environmental Change, 11(Supplement 1), S229–S237.Google Scholar
  13. Barnett, J., & Adger, N. W. (2003). Climate dangers and atoll countries. Climate Change, 61(3), 321–337.Google Scholar
  14. Barnett, J., Lambert, S., & Fry, I. (2008). The hazards of indicators: Insights from the environmental vulnerability index. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(1), 102–119.Google Scholar
  15. Barnett, J., & O’Neill, S. (2012). Commentary: Islands, resettlement and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 2(1), 8–10.Google Scholar
  16. Barton, A. D., & Casey, K. (2005). Climatological context for large-scale coral bleaching. Coral Reefs, 24(4), 536–554.Google Scholar
  17. Baxter, J., & Greenlaw, K. (2005). Explaining perceptions of a technological environmental hazard using comparative analysis. Canadian Geographer, 49(1), 61–80.Google Scholar
  18. Benioff, R., Guill, S., & Lee, J. (Eds.). (1996). Vulnerability and adaptation assessment: An international guidebook. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2002). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bettencourt, S., Croad, R., Freeman, P., Hay, J., Jones, R., King, P., et al. (2006). Not if but when: Adapting to natural hazards in the Pacific Islands region. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Bettini, G. (2013). Climate Barbarians at the gate? A critique of apocalyptic narratives on ‘climate refugees’. Geoforum, 45, 65–74.Google Scholar
  22. Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International, 30(6), 827–840.Google Scholar
  23. Bickerstaff, K. (2012). “Because we’ve got history here”: Nuclear waste, cooperative siting, and the relational geography of a complex issue. Environment and Planning A, 44(11), 2611–2628.Google Scholar
  24. Bickerstaff, K., & Simmons, P. (2009). Absencing/presencing risk: Rethinking proximity and the experience of living with major technological hazards. Geoforum, 40(5), 864–872.Google Scholar
  25. Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P., & Pidgeon, N. (2006). Situating local experience of risk: Peripherality, marginality and place identity in the UK foot and mouth disease crisis. Geoforum, 37(5), 844–858.Google Scholar
  26. Bickerstaff, K., & Walker, G. (2003). The place(s) of matter: Matter out of place public—understandings of air pollution. Progress in Human Geography, 27(2), 45–67.Google Scholar
  27. Birkmann, J. (2007). Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environmental Hazards, 7(1), 20–31.Google Scholar
  28. Bizikova, L., Robinson, J., & Cohen, S. (2007). Linking climate change and sustainable development at the local level. Climate Policy, 7(4), 271–277.Google Scholar
  29. Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (1987). Land degradation and society. London; New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  30. Bohle, H. T., Downing, T., & Watts, M. J. (1994). Climate change and social vulnerability: Toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change, 4(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  31. Bravo, M. T. (2009). Voices from the sea ice: The reception of climate impact narratives. Journal of Historical Geography, 35(2), 256–278.Google Scholar
  32. Brody, S., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behavior, 40(1), 72–95.Google Scholar
  33. Bryant, R., & Bailey, S. (1997). Third world political ecology. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Carney, J., & Watts, M. J. (1990). Manufacturing dissent: Work, gender, and the politics of meaning in a peasant society. Africa, 60(2), 207–241.Google Scholar
  35. CDPESC (Charte du Développement pour le Progrés Économique, Social, et Culturel de la Polynésie Française) (1995) Main Statistics of French Polynesia and Main Economic Goals of the Pact de Progres. Papeete, Tahiti: Charte du Developpement pour le Progrés Économique, Social, et Culturel de la Polynésie Française.Google Scholar
  36. Day, R. (2007). Place and the experience of air quality. Health and Place, 13(1), 249–260.Google Scholar
  37. Demetriades, J., & Esplen, E. (2008). The gender dimensions of poverty and climate change adaptation. IDS Bulletin, 39(4), 24–31.Google Scholar
  38. Eakin, H., & Bojórquez-Tapia, L. (2008). Insights into composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 112–127.Google Scholar
  39. Eakin, H., & Luers, A. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 365–394.Google Scholar
  40. Eakin, H., & Patt, A. (2011). Are adaptation studies effective, and what can enhance their practical impact? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 2(2), 141–153.Google Scholar
  41. Eakin, H., Winkels, A., & Sendzimir, J. (2009). Nested vulnerabilities: Exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(3), 398–412.Google Scholar
  42. Farbotko, C. (2010). Wishful sinking: Disappearing islands, climate refugees and cosmopolitan experimentation. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 51(1), 47–60.Google Scholar
  43. Farbotko, C., & Lazrus, H. (2012). The first climate refugees? Contesting global narratives of climate change in Tuvalu. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 22(2), 382–390.Google Scholar
  44. Fazey, I., Pettorelli, N., Kenter, J., Wagatora, D., & Schuett, D. (2011). Maladaptive trajectories of change in Makira, Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 21(4), 1275–1289.Google Scholar
  45. Frank, E., Eakin, H., & López-Carr, D. (2011). Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 66–76.Google Scholar
  46. Gabrie, C., Galzin, R., & Salvat, B. (1988). Activities humaines et recifs coraillien: Moorea. Papeete: Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
  47. Greenberg, M. (2009). Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: analysis of US national and site-specific data. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3242–3249.Google Scholar
  48. Guariguata, M. R., Locatelli, B., & Haupt, F. (2012). Adapting tropical production forests to global climate change: Risk perceptions and actions. International Forestry Review, 14(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  49. Harley, C. D., Randall Hughes, A., Hultgren, K. M., Miner, B. G., Sorte, C. J., Thornber, C. S., et al. (2006). The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecology Letters, 9(2), 228–241.Google Scholar
  50. Hartter, J., Stampone, M. D., Ryan, S. J., Kirner, K., Chapman, C. A., & Goldman, A. (2012). Patterns and perceptions of climate change in a biodiversity conservation hotspot. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e32408. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032408.Google Scholar
  51. Henningham, S. (1992). France and the South Pacific: A contemporary history. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  52. Henwood, K., Pidgeon, N., Sarre, S., Simmons, P., & Smith, N. (2008). Risk framing and everyday life: Epistemological and methodological reflections from three socio-cultural projects. Health, Risk, and Society, 10(5), 421–438.Google Scholar
  53. Hogan, D., & Marandola, E. (2005). Towards an interdisciplinary conceptualisation of vulnerability. Population Space and Place, 11(6), 455–471.Google Scholar
  54. Holifield, R. (2012). Environmental justice as recognition and participation in risk assessment: Negotiating and translating health risk at a superfund site in Indian Country. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3), 591–613.Google Scholar
  55. Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Bellwood, D. R., Card, M., Connolly, S. R., Folke, C., et al. (2003). Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science, 301, 929–933.Google Scholar
  56. ITSTAT (Institut Territorial de la Statistique). (1998). Te a vei’a Iti, bulletin d’informations statistiques. Papeete, Tahiti: ITSTAT.Google Scholar
  57. ITSTAT (Institut Territorial de la Statistique). (2000). Les tableaux de l’economie Polynésienne. Papeete, Tahiti: ITSTAT.Google Scholar
  58. Jasperse, J. A., Buncle, A., Pelesikoti, N., Nakalevu, T., Aiavao, U., & Moorhead, A. (2014). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in the Pacific: A practical guide. Apia, Samoa: SPREP/UNDP.Google Scholar
  59. Kaly, U. L., Briguglio, L., McLeod, H., Schmall, S., Pratt, C., & Pal, R. (1999). Environmental vulnerability index (EVI) to summarise national environmental vulnerability profiles. Suva, Fiji: SOPAC. SOPAC Report to NZODA, 38 pp.Google Scholar
  60. Kasperson, J., Kasperson, R., & Turner, B. (1995). Regions at risk: Comparisons of threatened environments. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Lata, S., & Nunn, P. (2012). Misperceptions of climate-change risk as barriers to climate-change adaptation: A case study from the Rewa Delta Fiji. Climatic Change, 110(1–2), 169–186.Google Scholar
  62. Lazrus, H. (2012). Sea change: Island communities and climate change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 285–301.Google Scholar
  63. Le Président de la Polynésie Française. (2012). Rapport du Président de la Polynesie Française à L’assemblee de la Polynesie Française. Papeete: Inspection Générale de l’Administration de la Polynésie Française.Google Scholar
  64. Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 45–72.Google Scholar
  65. Lima, M. L., & Marques, S. (2005). Towards successful social impact assessment follow-up: A case study of psychosocial monitoring of a solid waste incinerator in the North of Portugal. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3), 227–233.Google Scholar
  66. London, S., & Tucker, L. (1992). A comparison of the effects of agricultural and development at two bays on Moorea, French Polynesia and the effects of water outflow on a nearshore coral community, the ecology and geomorphology of tropical Islands course report. Berkeley: UC Berkeley Interdepartmental Studies.Google Scholar
  67. Masuda, J. R., & Garvin, T. (2006). Place, culture, and the social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis, 26(2), 437–454.Google Scholar
  68. McCarthy, J. J., Osvaldo, F., Canziani, O. F., Lear, N. A., Dokken, J. D., & White, K. S. (Eds.). (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. McNamara, K. E., & Gibson, C. (2009). ‘We do not want to leave our land’: Pacific ambassadors at the United Nations resist the category of ‘climate refugees’. Geoforum, 40(3), 475–483.Google Scholar
  70. Mertz, O., Mbow, C., Ostergaard Nielsen, J., Maiga, J., A., Diallo, D., & Reenberg, A. (2010). Climate factors play a limited role for past adaptation strategies in West Africa. Ecology and Society, 15(4), Article Number: 25. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art25/.
  71. Metz, B., & Kok, M. (2008). Integrating development and climate policies. Climate Policy, 8(2), 99–102.Google Scholar
  72. Ministère du Tourisme (2011). Les séries statistiques du tourisme en Polynésie française, Deuxième édition: Mise à jour 1. Papeete: Gouvernement de la Polynésie française. http://www.servicedutourisme.gov.pf/IMG/pdf/series_V2r1.pdf. 6 Sept 2012.
  73. Mortreux, C., & Barnett, J. (2009). Climate change, migration and adaptation in Funafuti, Tuvalu. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 19(1), 105–112.Google Scholar
  74. Moser, S. C. (2010). Now more than ever: The need for more societally relevant research on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Applied Geography, 30(4SI), 464–474.Google Scholar
  75. MSRDS (Ministère de la Santé et de la Recherche Direction de la Santé). (1998). Qualité Bacteriologique des Eaux de Baignade à Tahiti, Moorea, Bora Bora, Raiatea, et Huahine, Annee 1998. Papeete, Tahiti: Service d’Hygiène et de Salubrité Publique.Google Scholar
  76. Nakalevu, T. (2006). Capacity building for the development of adaptation measures in Pacific Island countries project. Apia, Samoa: Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Program (SPREP).Google Scholar
  77. National Research Council (NRC). (1999). Our common journey: A transition toward sustainability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  78. Nelson, D., Adger, N. W., & Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1), 395–419.Google Scholar
  79. Nicolaij, S., & Hendrickx, L. (2003). The influence of temporal distance of negative consequences on the evaluation of environmental risks. Human decision making and environmental perception: Understanding and assisting human decision making in real-life situations, 47–67.Google Scholar
  80. Nielsen, O. J., & Reenberg, A. (2010). Cultural barriers to climate change adaptation: A case study from Northern Burkina Faso. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 20(1), 142–152.Google Scholar
  81. Nielsen, J. O., & Vigh, H. (2012). Adaptive lives: Navigating the global food crisis in a changing climate. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 659–669.Google Scholar
  82. November, V. (2004). Being close to risk. From proximity to connexity. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(3), 273–286.Google Scholar
  83. November, V. (2008). Spatiality of risk. Environment and Planning A, 40(7), 1523–1527.Google Scholar
  84. Nunn, P. D. (2010). Bridging the gulf between science and society: Imperatives for minimizing societal disruption from climate change in the Pacific. In A. Sumi, K. Fukushi, & A. Hiramatsu (Eds.), Adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change (pp. 233–248). Tokyo: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  85. O’Brien, K., Leichenko’, R., Kelkar’, U., Venema, H., Aandahl, G., Tompkins, H., et al. (2004). Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 14(4), 303–313.Google Scholar
  86. O’Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19(3), 461–471.Google Scholar
  87. O’Brien, K., & Leichenko, R. (2003). Winners and losers in the context of global change. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
  88. Oliver-Smith, A. (2004). Theorizing vulnerability in a globalized world: A political ecological perspective. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development, and people (pp. 10–24). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  89. Osman, W. (2000). An update on French Polynesia. Honolulu: Bank of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  90. Parks, B., & Roberts, J. T. (2006). Globalization, vulnerability to climate change, and perceived injustice in the South. Society and Natural Resources, 19(4), 337–355.Google Scholar
  91. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson, C. E. (2007). Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2007. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Pelesikoti, N., Ronneberg, E., Nakalevu, T., & Leavai, P. (2013). Report on adaptation challenges in Pacific Island countries. Apia, Samoa: Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Program (SPREP).Google Scholar
  93. PIRAG (Pacific Islands Regional Assessment Group). (2001). Preparing for a climate change. Washington DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program.Google Scholar
  94. Porcher, M., & Gabrie, C. (1987). Schéma général d’exploitation de granulats et protection de l’environnement de Moorea et des Îles Sous le Vent: Les extractions en milieu coralline. Papeete, Tahiti: Antenne Museum.Google Scholar
  95. Reenberg, A., Birch-Thomsen, T., Mertz, O., Fog, B., & Christiansen, S. (2008). Adaptation of human coping strategies in a small island society in the SW Pacific: 50 years of change in the coupled human-environment system on Bellona Solomon Islands. Human Ecology, 36(6), 807–819.Google Scholar
  96. Robbins, P. (2003). Beyond ground truth: GIS and the environmental knowledge of herders, professional foresters, and other traditional communities. Human Ecology, 31(2), 233–253.Google Scholar
  97. Robineau, C. (1984). Du Coprah à l’Atome. Paris: OSTROM.Google Scholar
  98. Ruddell, D., Harlan, S. L., Grossman-Clarke, S., & Chowell, G. (2012). Scales of perception: Public awareness of regional and neighborhood climates. Climatic Change, 111(3–4), 581–607.Google Scholar
  99. Saitta, P. (2012). History, space, and power: Theoretical and methodological problems in the research on areas at (industrial) risk. Journal of Risk Research, 15(10), 1299–1317.Google Scholar
  100. Scott, D., Gossling, S., & Michael Hall, C. (2012). International tourism and climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(3), 213–232.Google Scholar
  101. Shisanya, C. A., & Khayesi, M. (2007). How is climate change perceived in relation to other socio-economic and environmental threats in Nairobi, Kenya? Climate Change, 85(3–4), 271–284.Google Scholar
  102. Smit, B., & Wandell, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–292.Google Scholar
  103. STT (Service Territorial du Tourisme). (2001). Frequentations touristiques 2000. Papeete, Tahiti: Ministère du Tourisme et de l’Environnement.Google Scholar
  104. Sundblad, E., Biel, A., & Garling, T. (2007). Cognitive and affective risk judgments related to climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 97–106.Google Scholar
  105. Thrift, N. (1999). Steps to ecology of place. In J. Allen & D. Massey (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 295–321). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  106. Tucker, C. M., Eakin, H., & Castellanos, E. J. (2010). Perceptions of risk and adaptation: Coffee producers, market shocks, and extreme weather in Central America and Mexico. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 20(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
  107. Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., et al. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074–8079.Google Scholar
  108. United Nations (2012). National accounts statistics: Main aggregates database. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/introduction.asp. 2 Oct 2013.
  109. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2007). Climate change: Impacts, vulnerabilities and adaptation in developing countries. Bonn, Germany: Information Services of the Climate Change Secretariat of the UNFCCC.Google Scholar
  110. Uyarra, M. C., Côté, I. M., Gill, J. A., Tinch, R. T., Viner, D., & Watkinson, A. R. (2005). Island-specific preferences of tourists for environmental features: Implications of climate change for tourism-dependent states. Environmental Conservation, 32(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
  111. Uzzell, D. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(4), 307–318.Google Scholar
  112. Venables, D., Pidgeon, N. F., Parkhill, K. A., Henwood, K. L., & Simmons, P. (2012). Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 371–383.Google Scholar
  113. Vignola, R., Klinsky, S., Tam, J., & McDaniels, T. (2013). Public perception, knowledge and policy support for mitigation and adaption to climate change in Costa Rica: Comparisons with North American and European studies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18(3), 303–323.Google Scholar
  114. Vincent, E. M., Lengaigne, M., Menkes, C. E., Jourdain, N. C., Marchesiello, P., & Madec, G. (2011). Interannual variability of the South Pacific Convergence Zone and implications for tropical cyclone genesis. Climate Dynamics, 36(9–10), 1881–1896.Google Scholar
  115. Walker, B. L. E. (2001). Sisterhood and seine-nets: Engendering development and conservation in Ghana’s marine fishery. The Professional Geographer, 53(2), 160–177.Google Scholar
  116. Walker, B. L. E., & Robinson, M. A. (2009). Economic development, marine protected areas and gendered access to fishing resources in a Polynesian lagoon. Gender, Place and Culture, 16(4), 467–484.Google Scholar
  117. Walter, J. (Ed.) (2004). World disasters report 2004: Focus on community resilience. London: Kumarian Press: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.Google Scholar
  118. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  119. Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society and Natural Resources, 19(9), 771–789.Google Scholar
  120. Zube, E. H. (1991). Environmental psychology, global issues, and local landscape research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(4), 321–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Louise Endemaño Walker
    • 1
  • David López-Carr
    • 2
  • Cheryl Chen
    • 2
  • Kitty Currier
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research, 2201 North HallUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Geography Department, 3611 Ellison HallUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations