GeoJournal

, Volume 79, Issue 1, pp 113–126 | Cite as

Factors influencing willingness to comply with HIV/AIDS prevention measures by female college students in Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Article

Abstract

With a 2.4 million people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), India is among the countries in the world most vulnerable to the spread of HIV. This study focuses on understanding what makes female college students (ages 18–24) in Kolkata, India willing to comply with HIV/AIDS preventive measures; these students are widely believed to be at low risk of infection with HIV. Through a questionnaire survey, the data used in this study was collected from 232 female students attending five higher education institutes. Multiple regression analysis reveals that religion, household income, perception of whether preventive measures would hamper freedom, and respondents’ perception of the effectiveness of preventive measures all influence the students’ willingness to comply with preventive measures. Based on its findings, the study makes several recommendations to improve HIV/AIDS prevention in Kolkata and West Bengal, India.

Keywords

Female college students HIV/AIDS preventive measures Modes of HIV transmission Affirmative score Kolkata West Bengal India 

References

  1. AVERT. (2007). Overview of HIV and AIDS in India. http://www.avert.org/aidsindia.htm.
  2. AVERT. (2010). India HIV/AIDS Statistics. http://www.avert.org/india-hiv-aids-statistics.htm.
  3. AVERT. (2012a). Who is affected by HIV and AIDS in India? www.avert.org/hiv-India.htm.
  4. AVERT. (2012b). Overview of HIV and AIDS in India. www.avert.or/aidsindia.htm.
  5. Bailey, A., & Hutter, I. (2006). Cultural heuristics in risk assessment of HIV/AIDS. Culture Health & Sexuality, 8(5), 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bowes, J. E. (1997). Communication and community development for health information: Constructs and models for evaluation. Review prepared for the National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Pacific Northwest Region. Seattle.Google Scholar
  8. Census of India. (2001). Report of census 2001. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.Google Scholar
  9. Choubey, K. (2007). Epidemic scenario of HIV/AIDS in India. Everyman’s Science, 40(1), 30–35.Google Scholar
  10. Craddock, S., Kalipeni, E., Oppong, J. R., & Ghosh, J. (2004). Beyond epidemiology: Locating AIDS in Africa. In E. Kalipeni, et al. (Eds.), HIV and AIDS in Africa: Beyond epidemiology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Ghosh, J. (2002). A geographical perspective on HIV/AIDS in India. Geographical Review, 92(1), 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghosh, D. (2007). Predicting vulnerability of India women to domestic violence incident. Research & Practice Social Sciences, 3(1), 48–72.Google Scholar
  13. Ghosh, J., Wadhwa, V., & Kalipeni, E. (2009). Vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among women of reproductive age in the slum of Delhi and Hyderabad. Social Science and Medicine, 68(4), 638–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IIPS (International Institute for population Studies) and ORC Macro. (2008). National Family Health Survey, India, 2005–2006: State Reports Delhi and Andhra Pradesh. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  15. Jurich, J. A., Adams, R. A., & Schulenberg, J. E. (1992). Factors related to behavior change in response to AIDS. Family Relations, 41(1), 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lambert, H., & Wood, K. (2005). A comparative analysis of communication about sex, health and sexual health in India and South Africa: Implications for HIV prevention. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 76(6), 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacNaughton, G. (2004). Women’s human rights related to health-care services in the context of HIV/AIDS. Health and Human Rights Working Paper Series No. 5. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  18. Mansfield, E. R., & Helms, B. P. (1982). Detecting multicollinearity. The American Statistician, 36(3), 158–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. NACO. (2005). UNGASS India Report. Progress Report on the Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS. http://aidsdatahub.org/en/india-reference-library/items/12031-ungass-country-progress-report-india-mational-aids-control-organization-india-2005.
  20. NACO. (2007). Behind the numbers. New survey indicates AIDS epidemic in check, but guard cannot be lowered. NACO News, 3(3). http://www.nacoonline.org/upload/naco%20nesletters/Vol.III%20Issue%203%20-%20Jul-sep/%202007.pdf.
  21. NACO. (2009). 20082009. Annual Report. New Delhi: Department of AIDS Control, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.Google Scholar
  22. NACO. (2010). ‘Red ribbon express’: National AIDS control programme, phase III, India.Google Scholar
  23. Pradhan, B., & Sundar, R. (2006). Gender impact of HIV and AIDS in India. A joint study of NCAER-UNDP-NACO.Google Scholar
  24. Ramasubban, R. (1998). HIV/AIDS in India: Gulf between rhetoric and reality. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(45), 2865–2872.Google Scholar
  25. Sharma, A. K., Gupta, A., & Aggarwal, O. P. (2001). HIV/AIDS related knowledge, risk perception, attitude and sexual behavior of working women staying in hostels. Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology, 67(1), 21–24.Google Scholar
  26. Sharma, R. K., & Ranjan, R. (2002). Gender differentials in the knowledge of HIV/AIDS in India: Evidence from RCH-RHS-II. In International conference on AIDS, July 7–12; 14: abstract no. E11401.Google Scholar
  27. Sirkin, R. M. (1999). Statistics for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Stroebe, W., & de Wit, J. (1996). Health-impairing behaviours. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 113–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Studenmund, A. H. (2006). Using econometrics: A practical guide. Boston: Pearson-Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. UNAIDS. (1999). Gender and HIV/AIDS: Taking stock of research programmes. Best practice collection. http://www.data.unaids.org/Publications/IRC-pub05/jc419-gender-takingstock_en.pdf.
  31. UNAIDS. (2010). Outlook Report 2010. Geneva: UNAIDS.Google Scholar
  32. Vandemoortele, J., & Delamonica, E. (2002). The education vaccine against HIV. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 3(1), 6–13.Google Scholar
  33. Verma, R. K., Pulerwitz, J., Mahendra, V., Khandekar, S., Barker, G., Fulpagare, P., et al. (2006). Challenging and changing gender attitudes among young men in Mumbai. Reproductive Health Matters, 14(28), 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wadhwa, V. (2012). Structural violence and women’s vulnerability to HIV/AIDS in India: Understanding through a “grief model” framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 1200–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wadhwa, V., Ghosh, J., & Kalipeni, E. (2012). Factors affecting the vulnerability of female slum youth to HIV/AIDS in Delhi and Hyderabad, India. GeoJournal, 77(4), 475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams, E. (2005). Asian culture and AIDS. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 12(1), 209–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations