College students’ consumption, contribution, and risk awareness related to online mapping services and social media outlets: does geography and GIS knowledge matter?
Location-enabled online tools and/or services (i.e. Google Earth/Maps, Flickr, Facebook check-ins, etc.) have been widely used for distributing and processing geospatial-related data. They attract diverse users to consume and contribute geographic information (GI) in many different forms. This study examines college students’ consumption and contribution of GI through these tools and/or services as well as their perception of risk and privacy. It evaluates the impact of Geographic information systems (GIS) and geography knowledge on the related behavior and perception. Through conducting a survey, it was found that college students’ consumption frequency of GI through the investigated tools and services is positively related to their knowledge in GIS and geography, but their GI contribution is not related. GIS knowledge was found to help raise students’ awareness level of risk. However, this relationship does not translate into students’ concern about potential privacy disclosure or their willingness to share personal location information through using location-enabled online tools and/or services. Discussions on the gap between students’ consumption and contribution of GI through the tools and/or services are shared in the paper as well as possible explanations on the disconnection between their risk awareness, privacy concern, and willingness to share personal information. Future research directions are discussed.
KeywordsGeographic information Consumption/contribution of geographic information Geographic information systems Location-enabled online tools/services Risk awareness Social media
- Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of producers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 4, 332–358.Google Scholar
- Consolvo, S., Smith, I. E., Mathews, T., LaMarca, A., Tabert, J., & Powledge, P. (2005). Location disclosure to social relations: Why, when, & what people want to share. In: CHI ‘05: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 81–90). Portland: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Goodchild, M. F. (2007a). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.Google Scholar
- Grira, J., Bédard, Y., & Roche, S. (2009). Spatial data uncertainty in the VGI world: Going from consumers to producer. Geomatica, 64(1), 61–71.Google Scholar
- Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., & Dey, A. K. (2003). Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In: CHI ‘03: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing system (pp. 724–725). Ft. Lauderdale: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Sheppard, E. (2001a). Geographic information systems: Critical approaches. In: N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences (pp. 6182–6185). Pergamon. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02524-9.
- Sheppard, E. (2001b). Geographic of information society. In: N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences (pp. 6182–6185). Pergamon. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02549-3.
- Toch, E., Cranshaw, J., Drielsma, P. H., Tsai, J. Y., Kelley, P. G., Springfield, J., Cranor, L., Hong, J., & Sadeh, N. (2010). Empirical models of privacy in location sharing. Ubicomp ‘10: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing (pp. 129–138). Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
- Turner, A. J. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.Google Scholar
- Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., & Hart, P. (2008). Examining the formation of individual’s privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view. ICIS 2008 Proceedings, 1–16.Google Scholar