GeoJournal

, Volume 78, Issue 4, pp 627–639 | Cite as

College students’ consumption, contribution, and risk awareness related to online mapping services and social media outlets: does geography and GIS knowledge matter?

  • Adam J. Mathews
  • Yongmei Lu
  • Matthew T. Patton
  • Nathaniel Dede-Bamfo
  • Junfang Chen
Article

Abstract

Location-enabled online tools and/or services (i.e. Google Earth/Maps, Flickr, Facebook check-ins, etc.) have been widely used for distributing and processing geospatial-related data. They attract diverse users to consume and contribute geographic information (GI) in many different forms. This study examines college students’ consumption and contribution of GI through these tools and/or services as well as their perception of risk and privacy. It evaluates the impact of Geographic information systems (GIS) and geography knowledge on the related behavior and perception. Through conducting a survey, it was found that college students’ consumption frequency of GI through the investigated tools and services is positively related to their knowledge in GIS and geography, but their GI contribution is not related. GIS knowledge was found to help raise students’ awareness level of risk. However, this relationship does not translate into students’ concern about potential privacy disclosure or their willingness to share personal location information through using location-enabled online tools and/or services. Discussions on the gap between students’ consumption and contribution of GI through the tools and/or services are shared in the paper as well as possible explanations on the disconnection between their risk awareness, privacy concern, and willingness to share personal information. Future research directions are discussed.

Keywords

Geographic information Consumption/contribution of geographic information Geographic information systems Location-enabled online tools/services Risk awareness Social media 

References

  1. Acquisti, A., & Cross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the facebook. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4258, 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, A. J., Holliday, P., Chau, R., Eisenberg, H., & Chau, M. (2010). Collaborative geospatial data as applied to disaster relief: Haiti 2010. Security Technology, Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 122, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of producers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 4, 332–358.Google Scholar
  4. Consolvo, S., Smith, I. E., Mathews, T., LaMarca, A., Tabert, J., & Powledge, P. (2005). Location disclosure to social relations: Why, when, & what people want to share. In: CHI ‘05: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 81–90). Portland: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  5. Curtis, A., Mills, J. W., & Leitner, M. (2006). Spatial confidentiality and GIS: Re-engineering mortality locations from published maps about Hurricane Katrina. International Journal of Health Geographics, 5, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dobson, J. E., & Fisher, P. F. (2003). Geoslavery. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 22(1), 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzge, M. J. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodchild, M. F. (2007a). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.Google Scholar
  10. Goodchild, M. F. (2007b). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 39, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodchild, M. F. (2009). NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise. Journal of Location Based Services, 3(2), 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grira, J., Bédard, Y., & Roche, S. (2009). Spatial data uncertainty in the VGI world: Going from consumers to producer. Geomatica, 64(1), 61–71.Google Scholar
  13. Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the geoweb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartgittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The rols of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hudson-Smith, A., Crooks, A., Gibin, M., Milton, R., & Batty, M. (2009). NeoGeography and Web 2.0: Concepts, tools and applications. Journal of Location Based Services, 3(2), 118–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Junglas, I. A., Johnson, N. A., & Spitzmüller., C. (2008). Personality traits and concern for privacy: An empirical study in the context of location-based services. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., & Dey, A. K. (2003). Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In: CHI ‘03: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing system (pp. 724–725). Ft. Lauderdale: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2012). Pervasive location acquisition technologies: Opportunities and challenges for geospatial studies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36, 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sheppard, E. (2001a). Geographic information systems: Critical approaches. In: N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences (pp. 6182–6185). Pergamon. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02524-9.
  21. Sheppard, E. (2001b). Geographic of information society. In: N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences (pp. 6182–6185). Pergamon. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02549-3.
  22. Toch, E., Cranshaw, J., Drielsma, P. H., Tsai, J. Y., Kelley, P. G., Springfield, J., Cranor, L., Hong, J., & Sadeh, N. (2010). Empirical models of privacy in location sharing. Ubicomp ‘10: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing (pp. 129–138). Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  23. Turner, A. J. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., & Hart, P. (2008). Examining the formation of individual’s privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view. ICIS 2008 Proceedings, 1–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam J. Mathews
    • 1
  • Yongmei Lu
    • 1
  • Matthew T. Patton
    • 1
  • Nathaniel Dede-Bamfo
    • 1
  • Junfang Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Texas State University - San MarcosSan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations