GeoJournal

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 1–19 | Cite as

Europeanizing Timisoara: neoliberal reforms, continuity with the past, and unexpected side effects

Article

Abstract

This paper analyzes how processes of Europeanization opened up opportunities and generated ideals, which in turn changed the articulation between political and economic powers in the city and county of Timisoara, Western Romania. It builds on case studies of local government agencies and foreign investors from Italy. In doing so, it discusses the circular relationship between the European and the local levels of governance: European governance affected the interactions between firms and institutions in the city, while at the same time city authorities used different understandings of ‘Europe’ to pursue their own agenda. It also shows some of the unexpected side-effects of Europeanization, due to the political activism of Italian investors. Beck and Grande’s concept of ‘reflexive modernization’ and the literature on regional economies frame the discussion.

Keywords

Europeanization Post socialism Romania Italian industrial districts Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs) 

References

  1. ADETIM. (n.d.). Micro-monographic guide of Timis County. Timisoara, ADETIM.Google Scholar
  2. Agnew, J. (2001). How many Europes? The European Union, eastward enlargement and uneven development. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bache, I. (2003) Europeanisation: A governance approach. Paper presented at the EUSA 8th International Biennial Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, March (copy available from the author, Department of Politics, University of Sheffield).Google Scholar
  4. Bachtler, J. F., & McMaster, I. (2007). EU Cohesion Policy and the Role of the Regions: Investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member States. Environment and Planning C: Government Policy, 26(2), 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachtler, J., & Mendez, C. (2007). Who governs EU cohesion policy? Deconstructing the reforms of the structural funds. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 535–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakić-Hayden, M. (1995). Nesting orientalisms: The case of former Yugoslavia. Slavic Review, 54(4), 917–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becattini, G. (1979). Dal ‘settore’ industriale al ‘distretto’ industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull’unità d’indagine dell’economia industriale [From ‘industrial sectors’ to ‘industrial districts.’ Reflections upon the units of analysis in industrial economics]. Rivista di economia politica e industriale, 1, 7–21Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2007). Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Begg, R., Roukova, P., Pickles, J., & Smith, A. (2005). Industrial districts and commodity chains: The garage firms of Emilia Romagna (Italy) and Haskovo (Bulgaria). Problemy na Geografiiata, 1–2, 153–165.Google Scholar
  10. Beilharz, P. (2009). Socialism and modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  12. Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (Eds.). (2005). Clusters, networks and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(2), 167–184.Google Scholar
  14. Buller, J., & Gamble, A. (2002). Conceptualising Europeanisation. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, University of York (copy available from the authors).Google Scholar
  15. Checkel, J. T. (2007). Whither Europeanization? International Studies Review, 9(2), 307–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiarvesio, M., Di Maria, E., & Micelli, S. (2006). Global value chains and open networks: the case of Italian industrial districts. Paper presented at the 18th Annual meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, held in Trier on June 30–July 2 (www.sase.org).
  17. Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks and joint ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Clark, J., & Jones, A. (2008). The spatialities of Europeanization: Territory, power and governance in Europe. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 33(3), 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, J., & Jones, A. (2009). Europeanisation and its discontents. Space and Polity, 13(3), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Convery, F., McInerney, D., Sokol, M., & Stafford, P. (2006). Organising space in a dynamic economy—Insights for policy from the Irish experience. Built Environment, 32(2), 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Delanty, G., & Rumford, C. (2005). Rethinking Europe: Social theory and the implications of Europeanization. Routledlge: London.Google Scholar
  23. Dolfsma, W. (2008). Knowledge economies. Organization, location and innovation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Doucet, P. (2006). Territorial cohesion of tomorrow: A path to cooperation on competition? European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1473–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drake, H. (2000). Jacques Delors: Perspectives on a European leader. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunford, M. (2006). Industrial districts, magic circles, and the restructuring of the Italian textile and clothing chain. Economic Geography, 82(1), 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunford, M., & Greco, L. (2006). After the three Italies: Wealth, inequality and industrial change. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Etzioni, A. (2007). The community deficit. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1), 23–42.Google Scholar
  29. EU. (n.d). Regional Policy. http://europa.eu/pol/reg/index_en.htm (Feb. 7, 2010. date accessed)
  30. Falkner, G. (2003). Comparing Europeanisation effects: From metaphor to operationalisation. European Integration Online Papers 7 (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2003-013a.htm (Sept. 7 2010. date accessed).
  31. Faludi, A. (2007). Territorial cohesion policy and the European model of society. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Featherstone, K. (2003). Introduction: In the name of Europe. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 3–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Federico, S. (2004). L’internazionalizzazione produttiva italiana e i distretti industriali: un’analisi degli investimenti diretti all’estero [internationalization of production and industrial districts: an analysis of Italy’s outward foreign investments]. In n.a., Economie Locali, modelli di agglomerazione e apertura internazionale. Roma: Banca d’Italia.Google Scholar
  34. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  35. Granovetter, M., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (2001). The sociology of economic life. Cambridge, Mass.: Westview.Google Scholar
  36. Gruber, K. (2002). Globalisation, regions, nations and integration: Central and Western European perspectives. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 3(2), 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hirt, S. (2007). The compact versus the dispersed city: History of planning ideas on Sofia’s urban form. Journal of Planning History, 6(2), 138–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hofe, R., & vom Chen, K. (2006). Whither or not industrial clusters: Conclusions or confusions? The Industrial Geographer, 4(1), 2–28.Google Scholar
  41. Hooghe, L. (2005). Several roads lead to international norms, but few via international socialization: A case study of the European Commission. International Organization, 59(4), 861–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hudson, R. (2000). One Europe or many? Reflections on becoming European. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25(4), 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hudson, R. (2003). European integration and new forms of uneven development. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hudson, R. (2004). Thinking through the geographies of the new Europe in the new millennium: Dialectics of circuits, flows and spaces. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(2), 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ICE. (2006). Economia 2005. Banato e Transilvania. Distretto di Timis [Economy 2005. Banat and Transylvania. Timis District]. Timisoara, Consolato Generale d’Italia a Timisoara.Google Scholar
  46. ICE. (2010). Nota congiunturale Romania 2009, [economic trend Romania 2009]. Roma: Istituto per il Commercio Estero.Google Scholar
  47. Jones, R., & Kierzkowski, H. (2000). A framework for fragmentation. In S. Arndt & H. Kierzkowski (Eds.), Fragmentation an international trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of national administrations: Patterns of institutional change and persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). The evolution and transformation of European governance. In B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (Eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 14–35). Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  50. Kuus, M. (2004). Europe’s eastern expansion and the reinscription of otherness in East-Central Europe. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 472–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laegrid, P., Steinthorsson, R. S., & Thorhallsson, B. (2004). Europeanisation of central government administration in the Nordic states. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(2), 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leibanath, M. (2007). Europeanization of cross-border governance? A case study on the cause, form and consequences of a co-operation project in the German–Polish–Czech border triangle. Space and Politi, 11(2), 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leitner, H. (2003). The politics of scale and networks of spatial connectivity: transnational interurban networks and rescaling of political governance in Europe. In R. McMaster & E. Sheppard (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method (pp. 236–255). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘New Regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lundequist, S., & Power, D. (2002). Putting Porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: Evidence from Sweden. European Planning Studies, 10(6), 686–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mamadouh, V., & van der Wusten, H. (2008). The European level in EU governance: Territory, authority and trans-scalar networks. GeoJournal, 72(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Markusen, A. (1986). Profit cycles, oligopoly and regional development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts economic geography, 72(3), 293–314.Google Scholar
  60. Markusen, A. (2003). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 37(6/7), 701–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Marshall, A. (1919). Industry and trade. A study on industrial techniques and business organization: And of their influences on the conditions of various classes and nations. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  62. Martin, R. (2008). Path dependence and path creation in the economic landscape. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  63. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  64. Massey, D. (1999). Spaces of politics. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 279–294). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  65. Mihas, D. E. M. (1997). Romania between balkan nationalism and democratic transition. Politics, 17(3), 1175–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Murphy, A. (2005). The changing geography of Europeanness. Geopolitics, 10(3), 586–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Murphy, A. (2008). Rethinking multi-level governance in a changing European Union: Why metageography and territoriality matter. GeoJournal, 72(1–2), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Nugent, N. (2003). The government and politics of the European Union (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  70. Olsen, J. P. (2002). The many faces of Europeanisation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(5), 921–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Paasi, A. (2005). Remarks on Europe’s transforming metageography. Geopolitics, 10(3), 580–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Painter, J. (2001). Space, territory and the European project: Reflections on Agnew and Paasi. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8, 42–43.Google Scholar
  73. Painter, J. (2003). Towards a post-disciplinary political geography. Political Geography, 22(6), 637–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Paniccia, I. (2002). Industrial districts: Evolution and competitiveness in Italian firms. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  75. Pavlínek, P., & Janák, L. (2007). Regional restructuring of the Škoda auto supplier network in the Czech Republic. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pence, K., & Betts, P. (2008). Socialist modern: East German everyday culture and politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  77. Perrin, J. C. (1993). Pour une révision de la science régionale: l’approche en termes de milieu, notes de recherche 148(3) Aix-en-Provence Centre d’économie régionale.Google Scholar
  78. Pickles, J. (1993). Environmental politics, democracy and economic restructuring in Bulgaria. In J. O’Loughlin & H. van Wusten (Eds.), The new political geography of Eastern Europe (pp. 167–185). London: Bellhaven Press.Google Scholar
  79. Pickles, J. (1998). Institutions, social networks, and ethnicity in the cultures of transition: industrial change, mass unemployment and regional transformation in Bulgaria. In J. Pickles & A. Smith (Eds.), Theorising transition: The political economy of post-communist transformations (pp. 115–146). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Pickles, J. (2002). Gulag Europe? Mass unemployment, new firm creation, and tight labormarkets in the Bulgarian apparel industry. In A. Smith, A. Swain, & A. Rainnie (Eds.), Work, unemployment, and economies. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  81. Pickles, J. (2004). A history of spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping, and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Pickles, J. (Ed.). (2008). Globalization and regionalization in postsocialist economies. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  83. Pickles, J., Smith, A., Roukova, P., Begg, R., & Bucek, M. (2006). Upgrading and diversification in the East European industry: Competitive pressure and production networks in the clothing industry. Environment and Planning A, 38(12), 2305–2324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Piore, M., & Sabel, C. (1984). The second industrial divide. Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  85. Pislaru, D. (n. d.). Interview with OECD.Google Scholar
  86. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  87. Porter, M. (1998a). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.Google Scholar
  88. Porter, M. (1998b). The Adam Smith address: Location, clusters, and the ‘new’ microeconomics of competition. Business Economics, 33(1), 7–13.Google Scholar
  89. Pricewaterhouse Coopers. (2004). Regional attractiveness report Romania. http://www.pwc.com/ro/eng/ins-sol/spec-int/Regional%20Attractiveness%20Index.pdf (April 11 2007. date accessed).
  90. Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Radaelli, C. (2004). Europeanisation: Solution or problem? European Integration Online Papers, 8 http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-016a.htm (March 19, 2010 date accessed).
  92. Rehak, S., & Sokol, M. (2007). Regional pathways towards the knowledge economy—Experiences from Slovakia. In Piech, K. (Ed.), Knowledge and innovation processes in Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw: The Knowledge & Innovation Institute.Google Scholar
  93. Sadler, D. (1997). The role of supply chain management strategies in the ‘Europeanisation’ of the automobile production system. In R. Lee & J. Wills (Eds.), Geographies of economies (pp. 311–320). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  94. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Scott, A. (Ed.). (2001). Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Scott, A., & Storper, M. (1987). High technology industry and regional development: A theoretical critique and reconstruction. International Social science Journal, 112(2), 215–232.Google Scholar
  97. Sellar, C. (2009). Geographical imaginaries of the ‘New Europe’ and the ‘East’ in a business context: The case of Italian investors in Slovakia, Romania, and Ukraine. Journal of Cultural Geography, 26(3), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sellar, C., Emilova, M., Petkova-Tancheva, C., & McNeil, K. (2010). Cluster Policies in Bulgaria: European integration, post socialist dynamics, and local level initiatives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00959.x.
  99. Sidaway, J. (2007). Spaces of postdevelopment. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Smith, A. (2003). Power relations, industrial clusters, and regional transformations: Pan-European integration and outward processing in the slovak clothing industry. Economic Geography, 79(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Smith, A., Pickles, J., Bucek, M., Begg, R., & Roukova, P. (2008). Reconfiguring “post-socialist” regions: Cross-border networks and regional competition in the Slovak and Ukrainian clothing industry. Global Networks, 8(3), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sokol, M. (2001). Central and Eastern Europe a decade after the fall of state-socialism: Regional dimensions of transition processes. Regional Studies, 35(7), 645–655.Google Scholar
  103. Sokol, M., van Egeraat, C., & Williams, B. (2008). Revisiting the “Informational City”: Space of flows, knowledge intensive business services and polycentricity in an emerging global city-region of Dublin. Regional Studies, 42(8), 1133–1146.Google Scholar
  104. Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York and London: Guildford.Google Scholar
  105. Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics. In R. Lee & J. Wills (Eds.), Geographies of economies (pp. 167–176). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  106. Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(1), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Szeleny, I., & Szeleny, S. (1995). Circulation or reproduction of elites during the postcommunist transformation of Eastern Europe: Introduction. Theory and Society, 24(5), 615–638 (special issue on circulation vs. reproduction of elites during the postcommunist transformation of Eastern Europe).Google Scholar
  108. Taylor, P. J. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(3), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Taylor, P. J. (1995). Beyond containers: Internationality, interstateness and interterritoriality. Progress in Human Geography, 19(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Tondl, G., & Vuksic, G. (2003). What makes regions in Eastern Europe catching up? The role of foreign investment, human resources and geography. Working Paper B-12. Bonn: Center for European Integration Studies, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
  111. Vink, M. (2002). What is Europeanisation and other questions on a new research agenda. Paper presented at the Second YEN Research Meeting on Europeanisation, University of Bocconi, Milan, November (copy available from the author).Google Scholar
  112. Wesley Scott, J. (2005). The EU and ‘Wider Europe’: Toward an alternative geopolitics of regional cooperation? Geopolitics, 10(3), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MississippiOxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations