Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 1–23 | Cite as

Geographies of global Internet censorship

  • Barney Warf
Article

Abstract

More than one-quarter of the planet’s population uses the Internet today, although access to it is highly uneven throughout the world. While it is widely celebrated for its emancipatory potential, many governments view the Internet with alarm and have attempted to limit access or to control its contents. This project seeks to provide a comprehensive, theoretically informed analysis of the geographies of Internet censorship. It begins by clarifying the reasons, types, extent of, and opposition to, government limitations of Internet access and contents. Invoking an index of censorship by Reporters Without Borders, it maps the severity of censorship worldwide and assesses the numbers of people affected, and using the Freedom House index, it correlates political liberty with penetration rates. Second, it explores Internet censorship at several levels of severity to explicate the multiple means through which censorship is implemented and resisted. The third part offers a moral critique of Internet censorship via a Habermasian interpretation of cyberspace as the closest real-world approximation of an ideal speech situation. The summary notes the paradox of growing e-government and continued fears of an expanded domain of public discourse.

Keywords

Internet Cyberspace Censorship Habermas 

References

  1. Abbott, J. (2001). Democracy@internet.asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: Lessons from China and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, P. (1996). Protest and the scale politics of telecommunications. Political Geography, 15(5), 19–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Africa ICT Policy Monitor. (2006). http://africa.rights.apc.org.
  4. Ahmed, A. (2002). Pakistan’s blasphemy laws: Words fail me. The Washington Post, May 19.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. (1997). Globalizing politics and religion in the Muslim world. Journal of Electronic Publishing, www.press.umich.edu/jep/archive/Anderson.html.
  6. Anderson, J. (2003). New media, new publics: Reconfiguring the public sphere of Islam. Social Research, 70(3), 887–906.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, K. (2009). Net surveillance and filters are a reality for Europe, too. The Guardian, June 24. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jun/24/kevin-anderson-internet-filtering.
  8. Arabic Network for Human Rights Information. (2004). The Internet in the Arab world: A new space of repression? http://www.hrinfo.net/en/reports/net2004/.
  9. Bahgat, H. (2004). Egypt’s virtual protection of morality. Middle East Report, 230, 22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barry, E. (2004). In Azerbaijan, a donkey suit leads to laughs, questions and possibly arrests. New York Times, July 15, 2009, p. A4.Google Scholar
  11. BBC News Online. (2002). Bahrain blocks opposition websites. March 26. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/world/middle_east/1895005.stm.
  12. Bernstein, J. (1995). Recovering ethical life: Jürgen Habermas and the future of critical theory. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bi, J. (2001). The internet revolution in China: The significance for traditional forms of communist control. International Journal, 56(3), 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brunn, S. (2000). Towards an understanding of the geopolitics of cyberspace: Learning, re-learning and un-learning. Geopolitics, 5(3), 144–149.Google Scholar
  15. Burnett, P. (2005). Internet censorship on the rise in Africa? http://www.worldhunger.org/articles/06/africa/burnett.htm.
  16. Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  17. Calhoun, C. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Conway, M. (2007). Terrorism and internet governance: Core issues. http://www.unidir.ch/pdf/articles/pdf-art2644.pdf.
  20. Cortés, M. (2000). Internet censorship around the world. http://www.isoc.org/inet2000/cdproceedings/8k/8k_4.htm.
  21. Crampton, J. (2003). The political mapping of cyberspace. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Crampton, J. (2007). The biopolitical justification for geosurveillance. Geographical Review, 97(3), 389–493.Google Scholar
  23. Crovitz, G. (2010). China’s web crackdown continues. Wall Street Journal, January 11. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703948504574649021577882240.html.
  24. Cunningham, K. (2002). Factors influencing Jordan’s information revolution: Implications for democracy. Middle East Journal, 56(2), 240–256.Google Scholar
  25. Dann, D., & Haddow, N. (2008). Just doing business or doing just business? Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the business of censoring China’s Internet. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deibert, R., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., & Zittrain, J. (Eds.). (2008). Access denied: The practice and policy of global internet filtering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Diker, D. (2003). Should Israel now send a new message to the Arab world? Jerusalem Letter, May 1. http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp497.htm.
  28. Dobson, J., & Fisher, P. (2007). The panopticon’s changing geography. Geographical Review, 97(3), 307–323.Google Scholar
  29. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2000). Mapping cyberspace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Dunn, M. (2000). The information revolution and the Middle East: An overview of the early literature. Middle East Journal, 54(3), 465–476.Google Scholar
  31. Elmer-Dewitt, P., Jackson, D., & King, M. (1993). First nation in cyberspace. Time, December 6, pp. 62–64.Google Scholar
  32. Eriksson, J., & Giacomello, G. (2009). Who controls what, and under what conditions? International Studies Review, 11(1), 206–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eurasianet.org. (2007). In Turkemenistan. Internet access comes with soldiers. http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav030807.shtml.
  34. Fandy, M. (1999). Cyberresistance: Saudi opposition between globalization and localization. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41, 124–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Froomkin, A. (2003). Habermas@Discourse.net. Toward a critical theory of cyberspace. Harvard Law Review, 116(3), 740–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gauch, S. (2001). Effects of Arab censorship blunted by the Internet. Christian Science Monitor, January 29, p. 1.Google Scholar
  37. Gellman, B. (2005). The FBI’s secret scrutiny: In Hunt for terrorists, bureau examines records of ordinary Americans. Washington Post, November 6, p. A1.Google Scholar
  38. Ghareeb, E. (2000). New media and the information revolution in the Arab world: An assessment. Middle East Journal, 54(3), 395–418.Google Scholar
  39. Ghattas, K. (2002). Surfing the net in Iraq. BBC News, May 1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1959481.stm.
  40. Goldsmith, J. (1998). Against cyberanarchy. University of Chicago Law Review, 1199(fall), 1217–1222.Google Scholar
  41. Goldsmith, J., & Wu, T. (2006). Who controls the internet? Illusion of a borderless world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Hachigian, N. (2001). China’s cyber-strategy. Foreign Affairs, 80(2), 118–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hachigian, N. (2002). The internet and power in one-party East Asian states. Washington Quarterly, 25(3), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harwit, E., & Clark, D. (2001). Shaping the internet in China: Evolution of political control over network infrastructure and political content. Asian Survey, 41(3), 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hohendahl, P. (1979). Critical theory, public sphere and culture: Habermas and his critics. New German Critique, 16(winter), 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Human Rights Watch. (2002). Human Rights Watch: World report 2001, Vietnam. http://www.hrw.org/wr2k/asia/Vietnam.html.
  49. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. International Censorship Explorer. (2006). Vietnam strikes back. http://ice.citizenlab.org/?p=150.
  51. James, R. (2009). A brief history of Chinese internet censorship. Time, March 18. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1885961,00.html.
  52. Kahn, J. (2002). China has world’s tightest internet censorship, study finds. New York Times, December 4, p. 1.Google Scholar
  53. Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. (2001). The Internet and state control in authoritarian regimes: China, Cuba, and the counterrevolution. Carnegie Endowment global policy program work, paper no. 21. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  54. Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. (2003). Open networks, closed regimes: The impact of the internet on authoritarian rule. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  55. Katyal, N. (2001). Criminal law in cyberspace. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1003, 1100.Google Scholar
  56. Kellerman, A. (2002). The internet on Earth: A geography of information. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Kellner, D. (1979). TV, ideology, and emancipatory popular culture. Socialist Review, 45(May–June), 13–53.Google Scholar
  58. Kellner, D. (1990). Television and the crisis of democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kreimer, S. (2001). Technologies of protest: Insurgent social movements and the First Amendment in the era of the Internet. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 150(1), 119–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kreimer, S. (2006). Censorship by proxy: The First Amendment, internet intermediaries, and the problem of the weakest link. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155(11), 11–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. LaFraniere, S. (2009). Censors put tighter grip on internet in China. New York Times, December 18, p. A. 14.Google Scholar
  62. Lake, E. (2009). Hacking the regime. The New Republic, September 3. http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/hacking-the-regime.
  63. Lee, J. (2001). Companies compete to provide Saudi internet veil. New York Times, November 19, p. A1.Google Scholar
  64. Luhmann, N. (1996). Quod omnes tangit: Remarks on Jurgen Habermas’s legal theory. Cardoso Law Review, 17(4–5), 883–900.Google Scholar
  65. MacFarquhar, M. (2006). In tiny Arab state, Internet is tool to fight rulers. New York Times, January 15, p. A1, 11.Google Scholar
  66. MacKinnon, R. (2008). Flatter world and thicker walls? Blogs, censorship and civic discourse in China. Public Choice, 134, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. MacKinnon, R. (2009). China’s censorship 2.0: How companies censor bloggers. First Monday, 14(2). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2378/2089.
  68. Malecki, E., & Moriset, B. (2008). The digital economy: Business organisation, production processes, and regional developments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. McLaughlin, W. (2005). The use of the Internet for political action by non-state dissident actors in the Middle East. FirstMonday. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_11/mclaughlin.
  70. Murdoch, S., & Anderson, R. (2008). Tools and technology of internet filtering. In R. Deibert, J. Palfrey, R. Rohozinksi, & J. Zittrain (Eds.), Access denied: The practice and policy of global internet filtering (pp. 57–72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  71. O’Brien, R. (1992). Global financial integration: The end of geography. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations Press.Google Scholar
  72. OpenNet Initiative (2004). Internet filtering in Saudi Arabia in 2004. http://opennet.net/studies/saudi. Accessed 18 Nov 2010.
  73. OpenNet Initiative (2005). Internet filtering in China 2004–2005. http://opennetinitiative.net/studies/china.
  74. OpenNet Initiative (2006). Singapore. http://opennet.net/research/profiles/Singapore.
  75. OpenNet Initiative (2007). Commonwealth of Independent States. http://opennet.net/research/regions/cis.
  76. OpenNet Initiative (2009a). Internet filtering in Iran. http://opennet.net/sites/opennet.net/files/ONI_Iran_2009.pdf.
  77. OpenNet Initiative (2009b). Internet filtering in Sudan. http://opennet.net/sites/opennet.net/files/ONI_Sudan_2009.pdf.
  78. Paltemaa, V., & Vuori, J. (2009). Regime transition and the Chinese politics of technology: From mass science to the controlled internet. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Parry, N. (1997). The past and future of information technology in Palestine. www.nigelparry.com/mideastinternet/unitednationspaper.html.
  80. Pierre, A. (2000). Vietnam’s contradictions. Foreign Affairs, 79(6), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Poster, M. (1997). Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere. In D. Porter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp. 202–214). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Privacy International. (2003). Silenced—Costa Rica. http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-103752.
  83. Quirk, M. (2006). The web police. Atlantic Monthly, May. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2006/05/the-web-police/4818.
  84. Reporters Without Borders. (2004). Pakistan annual report 2004. http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=10794.
  85. Reporters Without Borders. (2008). Belarus. http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=25496. 2008.
  86. Reporters Without Borders. (2009). Internet enemies. http://www.rsf.org/en-ennemi26106-Turkmenistan.html.
  87. Rhoads, C., & Chao, L. (2009). Iran’s web spying aided by Western technology. The Wall Street Journal, June 22. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562668777335653.html.
  88. Rodan, G. (2000). Singapore information lockdown: Business as usual. In L. Williams & R. Rich (Eds.), Losing control: Freedom of the press in Asia (pp. 66–81). Canberra: Asia Pacific Press.Google Scholar
  89. Sayare, S. (2009). As web challenges French leaders, they push back. New York Times, December 13, p. 26.Google Scholar
  90. Slane, A. (2007). Democracy, social space, and the internet. University of Toronto Law Journal, 57(1), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Steinberg, P., & McDowell, S. (2003). Mutiny on the bandwidth: the semiotics of statehood in the internet domain name registries of Pitcairn Island and Niue. New Media & Society, 5(1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stelter, B., & Stone, B. (2009). Web pries lid of Iranian censorship. New York Times, June 22, p. A1. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/world/middleeast/23censor.html.
  93. Stone, B., & Barboza, D. (2010). Scaling the digital wall in China. New York Times, January 16, p. B1.Google Scholar
  94. Taylor, P. (1994). The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Teitelbaum, J. (2002). Dueling for ‘Da’Wa’: State vs. society on the Saudi internet. Middle East Journal, 56(2), 222–239.Google Scholar
  96. Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Troianovski, A., & Finn, P. (2007). Kremlin seeks to extend its reach in cyberspace. The Washington Post, October 28, p. 1. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/27/AR2007102701384_pf.html.
  98. Villeneuve, N. (2006). The filtering matrix: Integrated mechanisms of information control and the demarcation of borders in cyberspace. First Monday, 11(1–2). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1307.
  99. Wagner, C., Cheung, K., Lee, F., & Ip, R. (2003). Enhancing e-government in developing countries: Managing knowledge through virtual communities. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 14(4), 1–20. http://www.ejisdc.org.Google Scholar
  100. Warf, B. (2009a). Diverse spatialities of the Latin American and Caribbean internet. Journal of Latin American Geography, 8(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Warf, B. (2009b). The rapidly evolving geographies of the Eurasian internet. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50(5), 564–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Warf, B., & Grimes, J. (1997). Counterhegemonic discourses and the internet. Geographical Review, 87(2), 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Warf, B., & Vincent, P. (2007). Multiple geographies of the Arab internet. Area, 39(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wines, M. (2010). China’s censors tackle and trip over the Internet. New York Times, April 8, p. 1, 4.Google Scholar
  105. Wriston, W. (1997). Bits, bytes, and diplomacy. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yang, G. (2003). The co-evolution of the internet and civil society in China. Asian Survey, 43(3), 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zittrain, J., & Palfrey, J. (2008). Internet filtering: The politics and mechanisms of control. In R. Deibert, J. Palfrey, R. Rohozinksi, & J. Zittrain (Eds.), Access denied: The practice and policy of global internet filtering (pp. 29–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  108. Zook, M. (2003). Underground globalization: Mapping the space of flows of the Internet adult industry. Environment and Planning A, 35(7), 1261–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zook, M. (2005a). The geography of the Internet industry. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zook, M. (2005b). The geography of the internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40(1), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zook, M., & Graham, M. (2007). The creative reconstruction of the Internet: Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace. Geoforum, 38(6), 1322–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations