, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 83–101

Interpreting amenities, envisioning the future: common ground and conflict in North Carolina’s rural coastal communities

  • Noëlle Boucquey
  • Lisa M. Campbell
  • Gabriel Cumming
  • Zoë A. Meletis
  • Carla Norwood
  • Joshua Stoll


This paper contributes to ongoing discussions about the implications of rural change and amenity migration for members of diverse rural communities. We engage with recent amenity migration and political ecology literature that focuses on social constructions of nature and landscapes, and how these constructions affect the attitudes and opinions of community members. We use our case study of a mail-based survey in Down East, North Carolina to suggest that the ways in which people conceptualize the particular ‘natures’ and landscapes of a place matters in terms of shaping people’s attitudes with respect to ongoing processes of change. We find that people’s opinions about environment, culture, and land use are often superficially similar but that when conflicts arise or particular actions are considered, substantial differences in people’s underlying conceptual frameworks are revealed. In particular we find that despite widespread shared appreciation of the environment and culture Down East, differing interpretations of these key terms lead to potential misunderstandings and land use planning challenges.


Amenity migration Rural Heritage Political ecology Landscape Community Planning 


  1. Brehm, J. M., Eisenhauer, B. W., & Krannich, R. S. (2004). Dimensions of community attachment and their relationship to well-being in the amenity-rich rural west. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cadieux, K. V. (2010). Competing discourses of nature in exurbia. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9299-0
  4. Cadieux, K. V., & Hurley, P. T. (2010). Amenity migration, exurbia, and emerging rural landscapes: global natural amenity as place and as process. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9335-0.
  5. Campbell, L. M., & Meletis, Z. A. (in review). Agreement on water and a watered-down agreement: Tracking the fate of a proposed development moratorium in Down East, North Carolina. Journal of Rural Studies (submitted).Google Scholar
  6. Carteret County, and Coastal Planning Services. (2005). 2005 land use plan update, Carteret County North Carolina. Morehead City.Google Scholar
  7. Castree, N., & Braun, B. (2001). Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Cronon, W. (1996a). The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History, 1(1), 7–28.Google Scholar
  9. Cronon, W. (Ed.). (1996b). Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  10. Cumming, G. (2007). Explorations in discursive ecology: Addressing landscape change with rural North Carolinians. Ph.D dissertation, Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Cumming, G., Guffey S. J., & Norwood, C. (2008). Opportunities and challenges in community capacity-building: Lessons from participatory research in Macon county, North Carolina. In C. Wilmsen, W. Elmendorf & L. Fisher (Eds.), Partnerships for empowerment: Participatory research for community-based natural resource management.Google Scholar
  12. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Eden, S. (2001). Environmental issues: Nature versus the environment? Progress in Human Geography, 25(1), 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finewood, M. H., & Meletis, Z. A. (2009). You can’t get there from here: Gentrification and the case of the Carolina docks. In Paper presented at AAG 2009: The annual meeting of the association of American geographers, Las Vegas, NV, March 2009.Google Scholar
  15. Fortmann, L., & Kusel, J. (1990). New voices, old beliefs: Forest environmentalism among new and long-standing rural residents. Rural Sociology, 55(2), 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghose, R. (2004). Big sky or big sprawl? Rural gentrification and the changing cultural landscape of Missoula, Montana. Urban geography, 25(6), 528–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gosnell, H., & Abrams, J. (2010). Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4
  18. Greider, T., & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology, 59(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halseth, G. (1998). Cottage country in transition: A social geography of change and contention in the rural-recreational countryside. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Henderson, J., & McDaniel, K. (1998). Do scenic amenities foster economic growth in rural areas? Regional Economic Digest, 1, 11–17.Google Scholar
  22. Hunter, L., Boardman, J., & Saint Onge, J. (2005). The association between natural amenities, rural population growth, and long-term residents’ economic well-being. Rural Sociology, 70(4), 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hurley, P., & Halfacre, A. (2010). Dodging alligators, rattlesnakes, and backyard docks: A political ecology of sweetgrass basket-making and conservation in the South Carolina Lowcountry, USA. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9276-7
  24. Hurley, P., & Walker, P. (2004). Whose vision? Conspiracy theory and land-use planning in Nevada County, California. Environment and Planning A, 36(9), 1529–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacob, S., Jepson, M., & Farmer, F. L. (2005). What you see is not always what you get: Aspect dominance as a confounding factor in the determination of fishing dependent communities. Human Organization, 64(4), 374–385.Google Scholar
  26. Jobes, P. C. (2000). Moving nearer to heaven: The illusions and disillusions of migrants to scenic rural places. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, C., Halfacre, A., & Hurley, P. (2009). Resistant place identities in rural Charleston County, South Carolina: Cultural, environmental, and racial politics in the Sewee to Santee Area. Human Ecology Review, 16(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Klepeis, P., Gill, N., & Chisholm, L. (2009). Emerging amenity landscapes: Invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larsen, S. C., Sorenson, C., McDermott, D., Long, J., & Post, C. (2007). Place perception and social interaction on an exurban landscape in Central Colorado. Professional Geographer, 59(4), 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Löffler, R., & Steinicke, E. (2006). Counterurbanization and its socioeconomic effects in high mountain areas of the Sierra Nevada (California/Nevada). Mountain Research and Development, 26(1), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McBeth, M. K., & Foster, R. H. (1994). Rural environmental attitudes. Environmental Management, 18(3), 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCarthy, J. (2002). First world political ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use Movement. Environment and Planning A, 34, 1281–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCarthy, J. (2008). Rural geography: Globalizing the countryside. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moss, L. (2006). The amenity migrants: Seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson, P. (1997). Migration, sources of income, and community change in the nonmetropolitan Northwest. The Professional Geographer, 49(4), 418–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelson, P. (2001a). Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family and class discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 17(4), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson, P. B. (2001b). Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family and class discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 17(4), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nesbitt, J., & Weiner, D. (2001). Conflicting environmental imaginaries and the politics of nature in Central Appalachia. Geoforum, 32(3), 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neumann, R. P. (2003). The production of nature: Colonial recasting of the African landscape in Serengeti National Park. In K. S. Zimmerer & T. J. Bassett (Eds.), Political ecology. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Paquette, S., & Domon, G. (2003). Changing ruralities, changing landscapes: Exploring social recomposition using a multi-scale approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(4), 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Park, D. C., & Coppack, P. M. (1994). The role of rural sentiment and vernacular landscapes in contriving sense of place in the city’s countryside. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography, 76(3), 161–172.Google Scholar
  43. Paulsen, K. (2007). Strategy and sentiment: Mobilizing heritage in defense of place. Qualitative Sociology, 30(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prudham, S. (2007). Sustaining sustained yield: Class, politics, and post-war forest regulation in British Columbia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 258–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2005). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Robbins, P., & Sharp, J. (2003). The lawn-chemical economy and its discontents. Antipode, 35(5), 955–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saint Onge, J. M., Hunter, L. M., & Boardman, J. D. (2007). Population growth in high-amenity rural areas: Does it bring socioeconomic benefits for long-term residents? Social Science Quarterly, 88(2), 366–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sayre, N. (2010). Commentary: Scale, rent, and symbolic capital: Political economy and emerging rural landscapes. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9297-2
  49. Schroeder, R. A., Martin, K. S., & Albert, K. E. (2006). Political ecology in North America: Discovering the Third World within? Geoforum, 37(2), 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott, A. J., Shorten, J., Owen, R., & Owen, I. (2010). What kind of countryside do the public want: Community visions from Wales UK? GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9256-y
  51. Sheridan, T. (2001). Cows, condos, and the contested commons: The political ecology of ranching on the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. Human Organization, 60(2), 141–152.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, N. (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, D. (2002). Rural gatekeepers and’ greentrified’Pennine rurality: Opening and closing the access gates? Social and Cultural Geography, 3(4), 447–463.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, M. D., & Krannich, R. S. (2000). “Culture clash” revisited: Newcomer and longer-term residents’ attitudes toward land use, development, and environmental issues in rural communities in the Rocky Mountain West. Rural Sociology, 65(3), 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taylor, L. (2010). No boundaries: Exurbia and the study of contemporary urban dispersion. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9300-y
  56. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Carteret County, North Carolina fact sheet: 20052007 American community survey 3-year estimates. [cited February 23 2009], Available from
  57. Walker, P. (2010). Commentary for special issue of GeoJournal on amenity migration, exurbia, and emerging rural landscapes. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9296-3
  58. Walker, P., & Fortmann, L. (2003). Whose landscape? A political ecology of the ‘exurban’ Sierra. Cultural Geographies, 10(4), 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker, P. A., & Hurley, P. T. (2004). Collaboration derailed: The politics of community-based resource management in Nevada County. Society & Natural Resources, 17(8), 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young, T. (2010). Democracy or expertise? objectivity as an elusive ideal in the resolution of a Vermont land use dispute. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9257-x
  61. Yung, L., & Belsky, J. M. (2007). Private property rights and community goods: Negotiating landowner cooperation amid changing ownership on the rocky mountain front. Society & Natural Resources, 20(8), 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noëlle Boucquey
    • 1
  • Lisa M. Campbell
    • 1
  • Gabriel Cumming
    • 1
  • Zoë A. Meletis
    • 2
  • Carla Norwood
    • 1
  • Joshua Stoll
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke University Marine LaboratoryBeaufortUSA
  2. 2.University of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada

Personalised recommendations