, Volume 76, Issue 5, pp 539–549 | Cite as

A social assessment of the Hebei-Spirit oil spill



This paper examines the early social consequences of the largest oil spill in Korea from December 2007 up to May 2008. The focus is on the social impact of the oil spill and its social implications in three major areas of oil spill response: (1) clean-up operations, (2) compensation, and (3) ecological impact. The paper highlights both the positive and negative consequences of the spill and the significance of the early social assessment to understand subsequent responses and adaptation in the long run.


Social consequences Community Oil spill Korea 


  1. Arata, C., Picou, J., Johnson, D., & McNally, S. (2000). Coping with technological disaster: An application of the conservation of resources model to the Exxon Vadez oil spill. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 12(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badri, S. A., Asgary, A., & Eftekhari, A. R. (2006). Post-disaster resettlement, development and change: A case study of the 1990 Manjil earthquake in Iran. Disasters, 30(4), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, M., Davis, E., & Witham, B. (2000). Recent development: A review of developments in ocean and coastal law 1999–2000. Ocean & Coastal Law Journal, 5(2), 367–368.Google Scholar
  4. Beamish, T. (2002). Silent spill: The organization of an industrial crisis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, H. A., & Vanclay, F. (2006). The international handbook of social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Birkland, T. A., & Lawrence, R. G. (1993). Economic-impact of an environmental accident—A time series analysis of the Exxon Valdez oil-spill in south-central Alaska. Sociological Spectrum, 13(1), 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruhn, J. (2005). The sociology of community connections. Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  8. Cheong, S. (2004). Managing fishing at the local level: the role of fishing village cooperatives in Korea. Coastal Management, 32(2), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheong, S. (2005). Korean fishing communities in transition: Limitations of community-based resource management. Environment and Planning A, 37(7), 1277–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheong, S. (2010). Initial responses to the MT Hebei-Spirit oil spill. Marine Technology Society Journal, 44(1), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, N. Y. (2000). The Exxon valdez oil spill Alaska. United Nations University.Google Scholar
  12. Denison, M. (2000). Does the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 rise to the level of a taking? How the court missed the boat in Maritrans, Inc. v. United States. Ocean & Coastal Law Journal, 5(2), 355–367.Google Scholar
  13. Dyer, C. L. (1992). Social disruption and the valdez oil-spill-Alaskan natives in a natural-resource community. Sociological Spectrum, 12(2), 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dyer, C. L. (1993). Tradition loss as secondary disaster–long-term cultural impacts of the Exxon valdez oil-spill. Sociological Spectrum, 13(1), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edelstein, M. (1988). Contaminated Communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  16. Faure, M., & Hu, J. (2006). Prevention and compensation of marine pollution damage: Recent developments in Europe, China and the US. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  17. Garcia, I. P. (2004). Nunca Mais! How current European environmental liability and compensation regimes are addressing the prestige oil spill of 2002. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 1395, 1417–1425.Google Scholar
  18. García Pérez, J. D. (2003). Early socio-political and environmental consequences of the Prestige oil spill in Galicia. Disasters, 27(3), 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. KORDI. (2008). Hebei-Spirit Oil Spill CleanUp, White Paper prepared by the Korea Ocean & Research Development Institute (KORDI). December 2008. Minstry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs, Coast Guard, Choongnam Province.Google Scholar
  20. KORDI. (2009). Report on the Hebei-Spirit Oil Spill. Ch. 5 Socio-economic conditions. Paper prepared by the Korea Ocean & Research Development Institute (KORDI). Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs (MLTM).Google Scholar
  21. Martin, G. (1999). Valdez spill leaves bitter residue: Oil is gone after 10 years, but ecological, economic fallout continues. SFGate, San Francisco Chronicle (March 24, 1999). Accessed 03 July 2010.
  22. MLTM. (2008a). Evaluation of marine pollution management: The case of Hebei-spirit oil spill. May 2008. Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs (MLTM).Google Scholar
  23. MLTM. (2008b). Mid-term report on marine oil pollution after the Hebei-Spirit Oil Spill. October, 2008. Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs (MLTM).Google Scholar
  24. Olshansky, R., Johnson, L., & Horne, J. (2008). Longer view: Planning for the rebuilding of New Orleans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(3), 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ott, R. (2008). Not one drop: Betrayal and courage in the wake of the exxon valdez oil spill, Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Palinkas, L. A., Downs, M. A., Petterson, J. S., & Russell, J. (1993). Social, Cultural, and Psychological Impacts of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Human Organization, 52(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  27. Picou, J. S., & Gill, D. A. (1998). Technological disaster and chronic community stress. Society and Natural Resources, 11, 795–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Picou, J., Marshall, B., & Gill, D. (2004). Disaster, litigation, and the corrosive community. Social Forces, 82(4), 1426–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rajkumar, A. P., Premkumar, T. S., & Tharyan, P. (2008). Coping with the Asian tsunami: Perspectives from Tamil Nadu, India on the determinants of resilience in the face of adversity. Social Science and Medicine, 67(5), 844–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sabucedo, J. M., Constsantino, A., Ferraces, M. J., Merino, H., & Duran, M. (2009). Psychological impact of the prestige catastrophe. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9(1), 105–116. Google Scholar
  31. Sutton, P. (2007). The Environment: a sociological introduction Polity: 73–80.Google Scholar
  32. Taean Annual Statistics. (2005). Taean County, Korea.Google Scholar
  33. Taean Annual Statistics. (2006). Taean County, Korea.Google Scholar
  34. Taean Annual Statistics. (2007). Taean County, Korea.Google Scholar
  35. Taean Annual Statistics. (2008). Taean County, Korea.Google Scholar
  36. Webler, T., & Lord, F. (2010). Planning for the human dimensions of oil spills and spill response. Environmental Management, 45, 723–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations