Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 29–41 | Cite as

Rethinking space: an outsider’s view of the spatial turn

  • Santa AriasEmail author
Article

Abstract

Geographical concerns with space and place have escaped the confines of the discipline of geography. Many humanities scholars now invoke such conceptions as a means to integrate diverse sources of information and to understand how broad social processes play out unevenly in different locations. The social production of spatiality thus offers a rich opportunity to facilitate interdisciplinary dialogues between different schools of critical theory. Following a brief assessment of the spatial turn in history, history of science, and political philosophy, this paper explores its implications for literary and cultural studies. It invokes a detailed case study of late 18th century Lima, Peru to explicate the dynamics of colonialism, the construction of racial identities, and different power/knowledge configurations within a particular locale. Space in this example appears as both matter and meaning, i.e., as simultaneously tangible and intangible, as a set of social circumstances and physical landscapes and as a constellation of discourses that simultaneously reflected, constituted, and at times undermined, the hegemonic social order. The intent is to demonstrate how multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship can be facilitated by paying attention to the unique of circumstances that define places within given historical moments. As seen in this example from literary colonial studies, other disciplines, therefore, can both draw from and contribute to poststructuralist interpretations of space as a negotiated set of situated practices.

Keywords

Historical geography Post-structuralism Lima Coloniality Spatiality Interdisciplinarity 

References

  1. Baker, A. R. H. (2003). Geography and history: bridging the divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, R. (2003). The cultural geography of colonial American literatures: Empire, travel, modernity. Cambridge studies in American literature and culture, [136]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benko, G., & Strohmayer, U. (1997). Space and social theory: interpreting modernity and postmodernity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Cañizares-Esguerra, J. (2002). How to write the history of the New World: histories, epistemologies, and identities in the eighteenth-century Atlantic world. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Capel Sáez, H. (1982). Geografía y matemáticas en la España del siglo XVIII. Barcelona: Oikos-Tau.Google Scholar
  6. Casey, E. S. (1993). Getting back into place: toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Casey, E. S. (2002). Representing place: landscape painting and maps. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Casey, E. S. (2005). Earth-mapping: artists reshaping landscape. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chang-Rodríguez, R. (2008). “Aquí, ninfas del sur, venid ligeras”: voces poéticas virreinales. Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, M., & Agnew, J. A. (2007). The problem with empire. In J. W. Crampton & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography (pp. 317–339). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Corrigan, J. (2008). Spatiality and religion. In B. Warf & S. Arias (Eds.), The spatial turn: interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 157–172). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Cosgrove, D. E. (2008). Geography and vision: seeing, imagining and representing the world. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  13. Echave y Assu, F.d. (1688). La estrella de Lima convertida en sol. Antwerp: Juan Baptissa Verdussen.Google Scholar
  14. Elliott, J. H. (1989). Spain and its world, 1500–1700: selected essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ethington, P. J. (2007). Placing the past: ‘groundwork’ for a spatial theory of history. Rethinking History, 11(4), 465–493.Google Scholar
  16. Falkheimer, J., & Jansson, A. (2006). Geographies of communication: the spatial turn in media studies. Goteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  17. Feijoo, B. J., & Stiffoni, G. (1986). Teatro crítico universal, o, Discursos varios en todo género de materias, para desengaño de errores comunes. Clásicos Castalia, 147. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar
  18. Finnegan, D. A. (2008). The spatial turn: geographical approaches in the history of science. Journal of the History of Biology, 41(2), 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1984). The order of discourse. In M. Shapiro (Ed.), Language and politics (pp. 108–138). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. García Camarero, E. (1970). La polémica de la ciencia española. Madrid: Aguilar.Google Scholar
  21. Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gulson, K. N., & Symes, C. (Eds.). (2007). Spatial theories of education: policy and geography matters. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Harley, J. B. (1988). Maps, knowledge and power. In D. Cosgrove & S. Daniels (Eds.), The iconography of landscape (pp. 277–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Harley, J. B. (1997). Power and legitimation in the English geographical atlases of the eighteenth century. In J. A. Wolter & R. E. Grim (Eds.), Images of the world: the atlas through history (pp. 161–204). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Hill, R. (2005). Hierarchy, commerce and fraud in Bourbon Spanish America: a postal inspector’s exposé. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jacob, C. (2006). The sovereign map: theoretical approaches in cartography throughout history. Translated by T. Conley & edited by E. H. Dahl. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jáuregui, C. A. (2008). Canibalia: Canibalismo, calibanismo, antropofagia cultural y consumo en América Latina. Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
  28. Kagan, R. L., & Marías, F. (2000). Urban images of the Hispanic world, 1493–1793. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Keith, M., & Pile, S. (1993). Introduction: the place of politics. In M. Keith & S. Pile (Eds.), Place and the politics of identity (pp. 22–40). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Livingstone, D. N. (1995). The spaces of knowledge: contributions towards a historical geography of science. Environment and Planning D, 13(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Livingstone, D. N. (2003). Putting science in its place: geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. López de Vargas Machuca, T. (1758). Atlas geográfico de la América septentrional y meridional. Madrid: Se hallarà en casa de Antonio Sanz.Google Scholar
  34. López Gómez, A., & Manso Porto, C. (2006). Cartografía del siglo XVIII: Tomás López en la real academia de la historia. Madrid: Real Academia de la Historia.Google Scholar
  35. Low, S. M., & Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. (2003). The anthropology of space and place: locating culture. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Malpas, J. E. (1999). Place and experience: a philosophical topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martínez-San Miguel, Y. (2008). From lack to excess: “minor” readings of Latin American colonial discourse. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Meléndez, M. (1999). Raza, género e hibridez en el Lazarillo de ciegos caminantes. North Carolina studies in the Romance languages and literatures, no. 264. Chapel Hill: U.N.C. Dept. of Romance Languages.Google Scholar
  40. Moraña, M., Dussel, E. D. & Jauregui, C. A. (2008). Colonialism and its replicants. In M. Moraña, E. Dussel & C. Jauregui (Eds.), Colonialism at Large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate (pp. 1–20). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: a guide to relational space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Naylor, S. (2005). Introduction: historical geographies of science–places, contexts, cartographies. The British Journal for the History of Science, 38(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nieto-Galán, A. (1999). The images of science in modern Spain. In K. Gavroglu (Ed.), The sciences in the European periphery during the Enlightenment (pp. 73–92). Dordrecht: Kluber Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Patier, F. (1992). La biblioteca de Tomás López: seguida de la relación de los mapas impresos, con sus cobres, y de los libros del caudal de venta que quedaron a su fallecimiento en Madrid en 1802. Madrid: El Museo Universal.Google Scholar
  45. Portuondo, M. M. (2009). Secret science: Spanish cosmography and the New World. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rabasa, J. (1993). Inventing America Spanish historiography and the formation of Eurocentrism Oklahoma project for discourse and theory (Vol. 11). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rabasa, J. (2000). Writing violence on the northern frontier: The historiography of sixteenth century New Mexico and Florida and the legacy of conquest . Latin America otherwise. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rabinow, P. (2003). Ordinance, discipline, regulation: some reflections on urbanism. In S. M. Low & D. Lawrence-Zúñiga (Eds.), The anthropology of space and place (pp. 353–362). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Safier, N. (2008). Measuring the New World: enlightenment science and South America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  51. Terralla y Landa, E. (1798). Lima por dentro y fuera. Madrid: Imprenta del Villalpando.Google Scholar
  52. Verdesio, G. (2001). Forgotten conquests: Rereading New World history from the margins. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Warf, B., & Arias, S. (Eds.). (2008). The spatial turn: interdisciplinary perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Winsor, J. (1889). Narrative and critical history of America. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
  55. Withers, C. W. J. (2002). The geography of scientific knowledge. In N. Rupke (Ed.), Göttingen and the development of the natural sciences (pp. 9–18). Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations