GeoJournal

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 167–183 | Cite as

Disruption, yet community reconstitution: subverting the privatization of Latin American plazas

Article

Abstract

Latin American scholars have recently discussed the privatization of urban public space. A fundamental aspect of this process is the disintegration of communities because it often targets and affects a peculiarly Latin American kind of public space: the plaza. Plazas have traditionally functioned as cultural centres in Latin American cites. They are central meeting points for political groups, sites of civic expression and public resistance, as well as places to purchase relatively cheap goods and services. Plazas are, therefore, sites in which families, neighbours, and political organizations mingle, interact, and also challenge authority. This paper uses these sorts of insights on public space in Latin America to develop a conceptualization of the plaza as a community centre. However, the multiple practices and interactions that occur in these forms of public space have been disrupted by state-led strategies which seek to privatize and sanitize public space, thereby disrupting—or even destroying—the community centre. I use primary materials on Mexico City’s Historic centre and its plaza to explore the ways in which this specific type of urban public space has been affected physically and symbolically by a regeneration scheme known as the Programa de Rescate.

Keywords

Community centre Public space Urban neoliberalism Plaza Mexico City 

References

  1. Alvarez, S., Dagnino, E., & Escobar, A. (Eds.). (1998). Culture of politics, politics of culture. Westview: Colorado.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Rivadulla, M. (2007). Golden ghettos: Gated communities and class residential segregation in Montevideo, Uruguay. Environment and Planning A, 39(2), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin, A., & Graham, A. (1997). The ordinary city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22, 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. (1999). Discourses of partnerships and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 36(1), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R., & Bridge, G. (2005). Gentrification in a global context: the new urban colonialism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barajas, L. F., & Zamora, E. (2002). Nuevas formas y viejos valores: urbanizaciones cerradas de lujo en Guadalajara. In L. Barajas (Ed.), Latinoamérica: países abiertos, ciudades cerradas (pp. 93–116). Guadalajara: UNESCO, Universidad de Guadalajara.Google Scholar
  8. Bayat, A. (2000). From ‘dangerous classes’ to ‘quiet rebels’: Politics of the urban subaltern in the global south. International Sociology, 15(3), 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borsdorf, A., & Hidalgo, R. (2008). New dimensions of social exclusion in Latin America: From gated communities to gated cities, the case of Santiago de Chile. Land Use Policy, 25(2), 153–160 (Benefit).Google Scholar
  10. Bosco, F. (2006). The Madres de Plaza de Mayo and three decades of human rights activism: Embeddedness, emotions and social movements. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 342–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brayman, M. (2003). 15 minutes with … Alejandra Barrios Richard: Head of Mexico City ambulantes group talks tough on indifferent government, money-grubbing shop owners and philanthropic poses of Carlos Slim. Business Mexico.Google Scholar
  12. Brenner, N. (1998). Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 5(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bromley, R., & Jones, G. (1995). Conservation in Quito: Policies and progress in the historic centre. Third World Planning Review, 17(1), 41–60.Google Scholar
  14. Bromley, R., & Mackie, P. (2009). Displacement and the new spaces for informal trade in the Latin American city centre. Urban studies, 46(7), 1485–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buie, S. (2000). Markets as mandala: the reotic space of commerce. In M. Miles, I. Borden, & T. Hall (Eds.), The city cultures reader (pp. 26–28). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Caldeira, T. (2000). City of walls: crime, segregation and citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. CANACO. (1987). El comercio ambulante en la ciudad de México. Cámara Nacional de Comercio.Google Scholar
  18. CANACO. (1989). Economía informal: quien provee a los ambulantes. Cámara Nacional de Comercio.Google Scholar
  19. Canclini, N. G. (1989). Culturas híbridas: Estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. México: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
  20. Carrion, F. (2000). Desarrollo cultural y gestion en centros históricos. Flacso: Ecuador.Google Scholar
  21. Carrion, F. (2005). The historic centre as an object of desire. City & Time 1(3): 1. [online] URL: http://www.ct.ceci-br.org.
  22. Clark, J. (2005). Changes in Mexico City’s historic center improve services but bring competition; changes concern merchants. El Universal (Mexico).Google Scholar
  23. Cordera, R., Ramírez Kuri, P., & Ziccardi, A. (2008). Pobreza, desigualdad y exclusión social en la ciudad del siglo XXI. México: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  24. Cornelissen, S., & Swart, K. (2006). The 2010 football world cup as a political construct: the challenge of making good on an African promise. Sociological Review, 54(2), 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coy, M., & Pohler, M. (2002). Gated communities in Latin America megacities: case studies in Brazil and Argentina. Environment and Planning B, 29(3), 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cross, J. (1998). Informal politics: Street vendors and the state in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Cross, J., & Morales, A. (2007). Street entrepreneurs: People, place and politics in local and global perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Crossa, V. (2009). Resisting the entrepreneurial city: Street vendors’ struggle in Mexico City’s historic center. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1).Google Scholar
  29. Davidson, M. (2007). Gentrification as global habitat: A process of class formation or corporate creation? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 490–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Davis, M. (1990). City of quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Davis, M. (1992). Fortress Los Angeles: The militarization of urban space. In M. Sorkin (Ed.), Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space (pp. 154–180). New York: Noonday Press.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, M. (2007). Planet of slums. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. De Gortari, H., & Hernandez, R. (1988). La ciudad de México y el Distrito Federal: Una historia compartida. Mexico: Departamento del Distrito Federal.Google Scholar
  34. Dikec, M. (2002). Police, politics and the right to the city. GeoJournal, 58(2/3), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Elwood, S. (2002). Neighborhood revitalization through ‘collaboration’: Assessing the implications of neoliberal urban policy at the grassroots. GeoJournal, 58(2/3), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Enríquez, L. (2002). Introducción. In L. Enríquez, M. E. Del Valle, M. C. Trujillo, C. Fernández, & C. Victoria (Eds.), “Una ciudad para todos” La ciudad de México, la experiencia del primer gobierno electo (pp. 11–28). México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.Google Scholar
  37. Ettlinger, N. (2003). Cultural economic geography and a relational and microspace approach to trusts, rationalities, networks and change in collaborative workspaces. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(2), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Etzioni, A. (1996). The new golden rule. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  39. Fenochio, A. B., & Dillingham, R. (2002). La Plaza Mexicana: escenario de la vida pública y espacio simbólico de la ciudad. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  40. Fisher, R., & Shragge, E. (2000). Challenging community organizing: Facing the 21st century. Journal of Community Practice, 8(3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Flores, L. (2004). Demanda López Obrador cambio a fondo de la política neoliberal. La Jornada: Ciudad, 9.Google Scholar
  42. Flusty, S. (2001). The banality of interdiction: surveillance, control and the displacement of diversity. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(3), 658–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Forbes Magazine. (2009). The Worlds Billionaires. Carlos Slim Helú. Online at http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/06/billionaires-2009-richest-people_all_slide_4.html.
  44. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In F. Barker, P. Hulme, & M. Iversen (Eds.), Postmodernism and the re-reading of modernity (pp. 197–231). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Fyfe, N. (1998). Images of the street: Planning, identity and control in public space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Fyfe, N. (2005). Making space for “neocommunitarianism”? The third sector, state and civil society in the UK. Antipode, 37(3), 536–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fyfe, N., & Bannister, J. (1998). ‘The eyes upon the street’: Closed-circuit television surveillance and the city. In N. Fyfe (Ed.), Images of the street: Planning, identity and control in public space. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Fyfe, N., & Milligan, C. (2003). Space, citizenship and voluntarism: Critical reflections on the voluntary sector in Glasgow. Environment and Planning A, 35(11), 2069–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Habermas, J. (1974). The public sphere: an encyclopedia article. New German Critique, I, 49–55.Google Scholar
  50. Hardoy, J., & Gutman, M. (1991). The role of municipal government in the protection of historic centers in Latin American cities. Environment and Urbanization, 3(1), 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Helms, G., Atkinson, R., & MacLeod, G. (2007). Editorial: securing the city: Urban renaissance, policing and social regulation. European urban and Regional Studies, 14(4), 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Herbert, S. (2005). The trapdoor of community. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(4), 850–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Herzog, L. (2006). Return to the Center: Culture, public space and the city building in a global era. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  55. Hiller, H. (2000). Mega-events, urban boosterism and growth strategies: An analysis of the objectives and legitimations of the Cape Town 2004 Olympic bid. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hubbard, P., & Hall, T. (1998). The entrepreneurial city and the ‘new urban politics’. In T. Hall & P. Hubbard (Eds.), The entrepreneurial city: Geographies of politics, regime and representation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Ilcan, S., & Basok, T. (2004). Community government: Voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibility of citizens. Citizenship Studies, 8(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jones, G., & Bromely, R. (1996). The relationship between urban conservation programmes and property renovation: Evidence from Quito, Ecuador. Cities, 13(6), 373–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jones, G., & Varley, A. (1994). The contest for the city centre: Street traders versus buildings. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 13(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Klein, N. (2002). No logo: No space, no choice, no jobs. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
  62. Lake, R., & Newman, K. (2002). Differential citizenship in the shadow state. GeoJournal, 58(2/3), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. Lira, P. C. (2000). Repoblamiento del caso central de Santiago de Chile: Articulación del sector public y el sector privado. In F. Carrion (Ed.), Desarrollo cultural y gestión en centros históricos. Flacso: Ecuador.Google Scholar
  65. Lovering, J. (2007). The relationship between urban regeneration and neoliberalism: Two presumptuous theories and a research agenda. International Planning Studies, 12(4), 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Low, S. (2000). On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  67. Low, S., & Smith, N. (2006). The politics of public space. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. MacLeod, G. (2001). Renaissanciation, homelessness, and exclusionary citizenship: Unraveling the contours of a ‘revanchist’ urbanism. Paper presented for session 3.1 in the 97th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers. February 27-March 3, 2001.Google Scholar
  69. Malkin, E. (2005). A modern space in Mexico City’s historic center. The New York Times. Section E, December 20.Google Scholar
  70. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  71. Massey, D. (1999). With the collective issues and debates. In D. Massey, J. Allen, & P. Sarre (Eds.), Human geography today. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  72. McCann, E. (2002). The cultural politics of local economic development: meaning-making, place-making, and the urban policy process. Geogorum, 33(3), 385–398.Google Scholar
  73. Middleton, A. (2003). Informal traders and planners in the regeneration of historic city centres: The case of Quito, Ecuador. Progress in Planning, 59(2), 72–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  75. Monge, R. (2003). Ambulantes: Los poderes de la calle. Proceso, 1365, 18–21.Google Scholar
  76. Moss, C. (2008). Capital refurbishment Mexico City has had a bad press, but work is under way to make it ‘safer, prettier and cooler’. The Daily Telegraph (London). June 21.Google Scholar
  77. Mouffe, C. (2006). On the political. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Navia, P., & Zimmerman, M. (2004). Las ciudades Latinoamericanas en el Nuevo [des]orden mundial. México: Siglo veintiuno editores.Google Scholar
  79. Novo, C. (2003). The ‘culture of exclusion: Representations of indigenous women street vendors in Tijuana, Mexico. Bulleting of Latin American Research, 22(3), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Olds, K. (1997). Globalizing Shanghai: the ‘global intelligence corps’ and the building of Pudong. Cities, 14(2), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pareyón, A. S. (2002). El Centro Histórico de la Ciudad de México: presente y futuro. In R. Mesías & A. S. Paredón (Eds.), Los Centros Vivos: La Habana, Lima, México, Montevideo (pp. 99–122). Lima: Red XIV.b Viviendo y Construyendo.Google Scholar
  82. Peck, J. (2001). Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcomes. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 43(3), 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pendras, M. (2002). From local consciousness to global change: Asserting power at the local level. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(4), 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ramirez, P. (2003). El espacio público: Ciudad y ciudadanía. De los conceptos a los problemas de la via pública local. In P. Ramirez (Ed.), Espacio público y reconstrucción de ciudadanía (pp. 31–58). México: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.Google Scholar
  87. Ramírez, P., & Ziccardi, A. (2008). Pobreza urbana, desigualdad y exclusión social en la ciudad del siglo XXI: Una introducción. In R. Cordera, P. Ramírez Kuri, & A. Ziccardi (Eds.), Pobreza, desigualdad y exclusión social en la ciudad del siglo XXI. México: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  88. Rodgers, D. (2004). “Disembedding” the city: Crime, insecurity and spatial organization in Managua, Nicaragua. Environment and Urbanization, 16(2), 113–124.Google Scholar
  89. Rojas, E. (1999). Préstamos para la conservación del patrimonio histórico urbano: desafíos y oportunidades. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.Google Scholar
  90. Romero, H. M. (1988). Cuauhtémoc: crónica histórica de la delegación Cuauhtémoc. Departamento del Distrito Federal: Colección Delegaciones Políticas: México.Google Scholar
  91. Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Scarpaci, J. (2005). Plazas and barrios: Heritage tourism and globalization in the Latin American Centro Histórico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  93. Sennett, R. (1990). The conscience of the eye: The design and social life of cities. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  94. Silva, A. (2001). Algunos imaginarios urbanos desde centros históricos de América Latina. In M. A. S. Carrión (Ed.), La ciudad construida: Urbanismo en América Latina (pp. 397–408). Ecuador: FLACSO.Google Scholar
  95. Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy Antipode, 43(3), 427–450.Google Scholar
  96. Sposito, M. E. (2002). Novos territorios urbanos e novas formas de hábitat no Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. In L. Barajas (Ed.), Latinoamérica: países abiertos, ciudades cerradas (pp. 93–116). Guadalajara: UNESCO, Universidad de Guadalajara.Google Scholar
  97. Springer, S. (2009). Violence, democracy and the neoliberal “order”: The contestation of public space in posttransitional Cambodia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(1), 138–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Staeheli, L. (2003). Women and the work of community. Environment and Planning A, 35(5), 815–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Staeheli, L. (2008). Citizenship and the problem of community. Political Geography, 27, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Staeheli, L., & Dowler, L. (2002). Introduction. GeoJournal, 58(2), 73–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Staeheli, L., & Mitchell, D. (2007). Locating the public in research and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 792–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Staeheli, L., & Thompson, A. (1997). Citizenship, community, and struggles for public space. Professional Geographer, 49(1), 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Svampa, M. (2001). Los que ganaron: la vida en los countries y barrios privados. Buenos Aires, Editorial Biblios.Google Scholar
  104. Swanson, K. (2007). Revanchist urbanism heads south: the regulation of indegenous beggars and street vendors in Ecuador. Antipode, 39(4), 708–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Taylor, M. (2000). Communities in the lead: Power, organizational capacity and social capital. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 1019–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Thuillier, G. (2005). El impacto socio-espacial de las urbanizaciones cerradas: El case de la región metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Revista EURE, 31(93), 5–20.Google Scholar
  107. Venegas, J. M., & Gallegos, E. (2004). Entrevista/andres manuel lopez obrador, jefe de gobierno del distrito federal. La Jornada, sección política.Google Scholar
  108. Venegas, J. M., Llanos, R., & Guadarrama, R. O. (2001). En marcha, el rescate del Centro Histórico. La Jornada, sección capital.Google Scholar
  109. Young, I. (1989). The ideal of community and the politics of difference. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (thinking gender). Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  110. Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Young, I. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Zukin, S. (1991). Landscapes of power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations