GeoJournal

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 153–165 | Cite as

A growth agenda without growth: English spatial policy, sustainable communities, and the death of the neo-liberal project?

Article

Abstract

The rapid onset of the recession in the UK in 2009 is likely to have profound implications for English spatial policy. The neo-liberal emphasis on supporting, and catering for, the expansion of the globally competitive London and the South East region is coming under strain as growth falters. The future of spatial policy seems uncertain as does the emphasis on what has been termed sustainable community-building. This paper explores and assesses the politics of assumption-building that have underpinned spatial policy practices and thinking in England under the Labour government. It examines and highlights some of the key challenges and difficulties that now face policy-makers and explores the possibility that we are witnessing the emergence of new forms of neo-Keynesianism. It shows that as the core assumptions of the 1990s and 2000s break down, so new opportunities are opened up for alternative, less growth-oriented agendas. The paper concludes by highlighting areas for further research and sketching out possible futures for the sustainable communities agenda.

Keywords

Spatial policy Recession Assumptions Neo-liberalism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Cian O’Callaghan and two anonymous referees for their constructive and encouraging comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Thanks also to Catherine Durose, James Evans, Katie Jones, Marc Parés, Lawrence Pratchett, Emma Street, and Erik Swyngedouw for their supportive comments, thoughts, and suggestions on a presentation based on the paper. The final version is, of course, the responsibility of the author alone.

References

  1. Allen, C. (2008). Housing market renewal and social class. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R., & Helms, G. (Eds.). (2007). Securing an urban renaissance. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baeten, G. (2009). Regenerating the South Bank: Reworking community and the emergence of the post-political regeneration. In R. Imrie, L. Lees, & M. Raco (Eds.), Regenerating London—governance, sustainability, and community in a global city (pp. 237–253). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (2002). The cosmopolitan society and its enemies. Theory, Culture, and Society, 19(12), 17–44.Google Scholar
  5. Birmingham Post. (2008). Section 106 agreements are being abused. December 24, p. 12.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Firing back—against the tyranny of the Market 2. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  7. Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Department of. (2009). Building Britain’s future: New industry, new jobs. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, D. (2009). A new age of austerity. In The guardian. June 1.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, A., Vidler, E., & Westmarland, L. (2007). Creating citizen-consumers: Changing publics and changing public services. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Cochrane, A. (2007). Understanding urban policy: A critical approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Confederation of British Industry. (2008). London business survey. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  13. Dean, M. (2007). Governing societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Department for Communities, Local Government. (2007a). Previously used land that may be available for development, 2007. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  15. Department for Communities, Local Government. (2007b). Place matters. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  16. Department for Communities, Local Government. (2008). Sustainable Communities Act 2007: A guide. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, T. (2007). Heroes or villans? The role of the UK property development industry in sustainable urban brownfield regeneration. In T. Dixon, M. Raco, P. Catney, & D. N. Lerner (Eds.), Sustainable brownfield regeneration: Liveable places from problem spaces (pp. 89–118). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. East of England Development Agency, the London Development Agency, and South East of England Development Agency. (2008). Thames Gateway investment plan. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  19. Economist, The. (2009a). Accelerating downhill. January 17, p. 13.Google Scholar
  20. Economist, The. (2009b). The return of economic nationalism. January 24, p. 14.Google Scholar
  21. Economist, The. (2009c). Globalisation under strain: Homeward bound. http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13057265. Accessed 5 February 2009.
  22. Ellis, R., McGrath, H., & Braithwaite, J. (2008). The Thames Gateway investment plan. London: SEEDA and EEDA.Google Scholar
  23. Europa. (2009). The Schengen area and co-operation. http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l33020.htm.
  24. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (2003). Runaway world—how globalisation is re-shaping our lives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, D. (2009). Opening speech at the urban reform tent, January 29, 2009, World Social Forum, Belem.Google Scholar
  29. Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2008). Soft spaces in local economic development. Local Economy, 23(2), 138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Healey, P. (2002). On creating the ‘city’ as a collective resource. Urban Studies, 39(10), 1777–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  32. Her Majesty’s Treasury. (2009). Spring—supplementary evidence. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/psr_pse_spring08_09.htm. Accessed 20 March 2009.
  33. Hutton, J. (2008). Being rich should be celebrated. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7289113.stm. Accessed 2 August 2008.
  34. Jessop, B. (2002). Institutional re(turns) and the strategic-relational approach. Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1213–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, M. (2001). The rise of the regional state in economic governance: ‘Partnerships for prosperity’ or new scales of state power? Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1185–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keogh, L. (2009). Heritage, sustainable communities, and brownfield development in the Thames Gateway, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geography, King’s College London, London.Google Scholar
  37. Kleinman, M. (2003). The economic impact of labour migration. In S. Spencer (Ed.), The politics of migration—managing opportunity, conflict and change (pp. 59–74). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Kymlicka, W. (2003). Immigration, citizenship, multiculturalism: Exploring the links. In S. Spencer (Ed.), The politics of migration—managing opportunity, conflict and change (pp. 195–208). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. London First. (2008). Keeping the UK competitive. http://www.london-first.co.uk/keeping-the-uk-competitive/. Accessed 20 November.
  40. Massey, D., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. (2005). Worlds in motion—understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mayor of London. (2003). London—cultural capital. London: Mayor of London.Google Scholar
  42. Monk, S., Whitehead, C., & Burgess, G. (2008). The provision of affordable housing through Section 106: The situation in 2007. RICS research paper, 7, Number 14.Google Scholar
  43. Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Mulgan, G. (2006). Good and Bad Power. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  45. National Housing Federation. (2009). Homepage. http://www.housing.org.uk/. Accessed 27 March.
  46. Northern Way. (2009). Moving forward—the Northern Way. http://www.thenorthernway.co.uk/. Accessed 12 March.
  47. Offe, C. (1995). Modernity and the state. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  48. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2003). Building sustainable communities: The sustainable communities plan. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  49. Poynter, G. (2008). The credit crunch and London’s economy, rising East online, 8a. http://www.uel.ac.uk/risingeast/archive08/academic/poynter.htm. Accessed 15 June 2009.
  50. Raco, M. (2007). Building sustainable communities: Spatial policy and labour mobility in post-war Britain. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  51. Raco, M. (2009). From expectations to aspirations: State modernisation, urban policy, and the existential politics of welfare in the UK. Political Geography (in press).Google Scholar
  52. Sayer, A. (1999). Realism and social science. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. South East England Development Agency. (2006). Sustaining success. Guildford: SEEDA.Google Scholar
  54. Spencer, S. (2003). Introduction. In S. Spencer (Ed.), The politics of migration—managing opportunity, conflict and change (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the post political condition. In R. Kreuger & D. Gibbs (Eds.), The sustainable development paradox (pp. 13–41). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  56. Taxpayers’ Alliance. (2008). The case for abolishing regional development agencies. http://tpa.typepad.com/home/files/structure_of_government_3_the_case_for_abolishing_rdas_e.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2009.
  57. Treasury and Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. (2008). The London economy—responding to changing economic circumstances. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  58. UK Trade and Investment Council. (2009). Engineering and investor case studies. http://www.ukinvest.gov.uk/Investor-case-studies/4010621/en-GB.html. Accessed 27 March.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations