, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 185–198 | Cite as

Water quality changes in the Elbe River basin, Czech Republic, in the context of the post-socialist economic transition

  • Jakub LanghammerEmail author


This paper analyses the temporal dynamics and spatial trends in water quality changes in the Elbe River basin in the context of the post-socialist economic transition of the Czech Republic (Czechia). During the 1990s, the Czech portion of the Elbe River Basin underwent significant changes in the quality of surface waters. After a long period of massive discharges of pollution, which reached a peak at the end of the 1980s, a reduction in effluent from industrial and municipal sources led to a substantial decrease in the pollution of the Elbe River and its principal tributaries. The scope and speed of such water quality changes was unprecedented in Czechia as well as throughout Europe. The classification of the spatial distribution of water quality trends revealed that the majority of streams in the Czech Elbe River basin displayed improvement of surface water quality. However, the decrease in pollution levels was spatially concentrated mainly in the Elbe River and its main tributaries. Many of the peripheral streams are, on the contrary, experiencing deteriorating water quality, even in regions where water quality improved in the early 1990s because of a decline in local economic activity associated with political changes in the former Eastern Block countries. Further improvements in water quality are thus dependent on measures adopted across the entire river basin, including the numerous minor streams. The current economic revival in a number of regions where decreases in water pollution were not based on systematic pollution reduction measures, but only on the decline of industrial or agricultural production, may result in a return to deteriorating water quality, primarily in the outer regions of the catchment.


Water quality Pollution Elbe River Economic transition Czech Republic 



This research was funded by the Joint Research Scheme MSM 0021620831 “Geographical Systems and Risk Processes in Context of Global Changes and European Integration” which is fully appreciated by the author.


  1. Baker, S., & Jehlicka, P. (Eds.). (1998). Dilemmas of transition: The environment, democracy and economic reform in East Central Europe. London; Portland: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  2. Behrendt, H. (1996). Inventories of point and diffuse sources and estimated nutrient loads—A comparison for different river basins in Central Europe. Water Science and Technology, 33(4–5), 99–107. doi: 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00219-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behrendt, H., & Nesměrák, I. (1995). Belastung des Elbesystems aus flächenhaften und diffusen Quellen. Symposium 5 Jahre IKSE (pp. 89–100). Magdeburg: IKSE.Google Scholar
  4. Benácek, V. (2001). History of Czech economic and political alignments viewed as a transition. In D. Salvatore, M. Svetlicic, & J. P. Damijan (Eds.), Small countries in a global economy (pp. 133–154). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  5. Bičík, I., Jelecek, L., & Štepánek, V. (2001). Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Land Use Policy, 18(1), 65–73. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00047-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blažková, Š., Nesměrák, I., & Novický, O. (1998). Elbe project II. Prague: VUV TGM.Google Scholar
  7. Chloupkova, J. (2002). Czech agricultural sector: Organizational structure and its transformation. Copenhagen: The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University.Google Scholar
  8. CHMI. (2008). Water quality monitoring diabase. Czech Hydrometeorological Institute. Accessed 20.6.2008.
  9. CSO. (2008). Czech statistical office—Public database. Accessed 10.7.2008.
  10. De Wit, M., & Behrendt, H. (1999). Nitrogen and phosphorus emissions from soil to surface water in the Rhine and Elbe basins. Water Science and Technology, 39(1), 109–116. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00325-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EEA. (2001). Nitrogen and phosphorus in river stations by river size and catchment type. EEA. Accessed 6.5.2008.
  12. ICPER. (2008). International Commission for the Protection of the Elbe River. Accessed 10.7.2008.
  13. IKSE. (1991). First action programme (emergency programme) for the decrease of the hazardous substances outflow in the Elbe River and its basin. Magdeburg: IKSE.Google Scholar
  14. Krysanova, V., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Pinskwar, I., & Habeck, A. (2006). Regional socio-economic and environmental changes and their impacts on water resources on example of Odra and Elbe basins. Water Resources Management, 20(4), 607–641. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-3091-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langhammer, J. (2000). Trends of water quality of the Elbe River. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Geographica. Universita Karlova, 35(1), 127–138.Google Scholar
  16. Langhammer, J. (2004). Modelling the structural changes of water quality in the Elbe River basin. Ekologia (Bratislava), 23(Suppl. 1), 157–169.Google Scholar
  17. Langhammer, J., & Kliment, Z. (2007). Water quality changes in selected rural catchments in the Czech Republic. In A. V. Auzet, V. Jetten, M. Kirkby, J. Boardman, T. Dostál, J. Krása, & M. Stankoviansky (Eds.), Off-site impacts of erosion and sediment transport (pp. 19–34). Prague: CVUT.Google Scholar
  18. MZP. (1997). Zpráva o stavu ochrany vod před znečištěním v ČR v roce1996. [Report on the state of protection of waters against pollution in the Czech Republic, in Czech]. Accessed 3.4.2008.
  19. MZP. (2008). Statistical environmental yearbook of the Czech Republic: Ministry of environment of Czechia (MZP). Accessed 10.7.2008.
  20. Nesměrák, I. (2001). Assessment of the water protection benefits using environmental indicators. Elbe Project Bulletin, 2001(3), 1–4.Google Scholar
  21. Pavlinek, P., & Pickles, J. (2000). Environmental transitions: Transformation and ecological defense in Central and Eastern Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Rosendorf, P., & Prchalová, H. (1999). Elimination of nonpoint pollution of surface and subsurface waters. (Omezování plošného znecištení povrchových a podzemních vod v CR: etapová zpráva za rok 1998, in Czech). Prague: VUV TGM.Google Scholar
  23. Svejnar, J. (1995). Czechia and economic transition in Eastern Europe: San Diego. CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Teichova, A. (1988). The Czechoslovak economy, 1918–1980. London–New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Thyssen, N. (2001). Rivers in the European Union: Water quality, status and trends. In H. J. Nijland & M. J. R. Cals (Eds.), River restoration in Europe (pp. 66–71). Lelystad: RIZA.Google Scholar
  26. Vavroušek, J., & Moldan, B. (1989). Stav a vývoj životního prostredí v Ceskoslovensku. Praha.Google Scholar
  27. VUV. (2008). HEIS—Hydro ecological information system. Accessed 10.8.2008.
  28. Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5(1), 29–60.Google Scholar
  29. Zeman, K. (2000). Competitiveness and sectoral and branch structure of Czechia in international comparison. In effects and perspectives of cooperation of visegrad Countries and of their EU integration (pp. 63–110) (pp. 63–110). Bratislava: Institute of Slovak and World Economy of Slovak Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  30. Zeman, K. (2001). Progress towards accession, restructuring of manufacturing industry and competitive position of the Czech economy. Prague: ICRE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations