GeoJournal

, Volume 75, Issue 6, pp 567–579 | Cite as

Social actors and their role in metropolitan governance in Montréal: towards an inclusive coalition?

Article

Abstract

The article is about the role of civil society organizations in the governance of the Montréal metropolitan region. It identifies a high level of cooperation around metropolitan scale issues on the part of these organizations. In the Montréal region, government agencies as well as private corporations demonstrate readiness to work alongside civil society organizations on joint projects. Evidence of this type of collaboration is particularly strong in the case of economic development, neighbourhood revitalization and cultural initiatives. This form of cooperation is perceived as a manifestation of the so-called “Québec model” and is an asset for the Montréal metropolitan region. The article demonstrates that interventions that involve social organizations are more likely to be successful than those that turn their back on these organizations.

Keywords

Metropolitan governance Regime theory Quebec model Civil society actors 

References

  1. Amin, A. (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnekov, T., & Rich, D. (1989). Privatism and the limits of local economy development policy. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 25, 212–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrère-Maurisson, M.-A., & Tremblay, D.-G. (2008). La gouvernance de la conciliation travail-famille: comparaison France-Québec. Santé, société et solidarité (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, R., & Saillard, Y. (Eds.). (2002). Théorie de la régulation: état des savoirs. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  5. Bourque, G. L. (2000). Le modèle québécois de développement: De l’émergence au renouvellement. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  6. Brunet-Jailly, E. (2008). Vancouver: The sustainable city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30, 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2004). The network society. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Deitrick, S. (1999). The post industrial revitalization of Pittsburgh: Myths and evidence. Community Development Journal, 34, 4–12.Google Scholar
  9. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), New institutionalism in organisational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Fontan, J.-M., Klein, J.-L., & Tremblay, D.-G. (2004). Collective action in local development. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 13, 317–336.Google Scholar
  12. Fontan, J.-M., Klein, J.-L., & Tremblay, D.-G. (2005). Innovation socioterritoriale et reconversion économique. Le cas de Montréal. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  13. Hamel, P., & Jouve, B. (2008). In search of a stable urban regime for Montreal: Issues and challenges in metropolitan development. Urban Research & Practice, 1(1), 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000). Doing institutional analysis: Implication for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy, 7, 595–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hula, R. C., et al. (1997). Urban politics, governing nonprofits and community revitalization. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Imbroscio, D. L. (1998). Reformulating urban regime theory: The division of labor between state and market reconsidered. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jetté, C. (2008). Les organismes communautaires et la transformation de l’État-providence. Sainte-Foy, QC: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  18. Jouve, B. (2003). La gouvernance urbaine en questions. Paris: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. Klein, J.-L., Tremblay, D.-G., & Bussières, D. (2009). Social economy-based local initiatives and social innovation: A Montreal case study. International Journal of Technology Management (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  20. Kresl, P. K. (2003). Revitalisation des quartiers centraux aux États-Unis: vers une attitude proactive. In J.-M. Fontan, J.-L. Klein, & B. Lévesque (Eds.), Reconversion économique et développement territorial (pp. 51–76). Sainte-Foy, QC: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  21. Leslie, D., & Rantisi, N. M. (2006). Governing the design economy in Montréal, Canada. Urban Affairs Review, 41, 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lévesque, B. (2001). Le modèle québécois: un horizon théorique pour la recherche, une porte d’entrée pour un projet de société. Montréal: Cahiers du CRISES. ET0105.Google Scholar
  23. Lévesque, B., & Mendell, M. (1999). L’économie sociale au Québec: éléments théoriques et empiriques pour le débat et la recherche. Lien social et Politiques, 41, 105–118.Google Scholar
  24. Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Markusen, A. (2006a). Cultural planning and the creative city. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Collegiate Schools of Planning, Fort Worth, Texas, November 12. www.hhh.umn.edu/img/assets/6158/271PlanningCulturalSpace.pdf.
  26. Markusen, A. (2006b). Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1921–1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markusen, A., & Schrock, G. (2006). The distinctive city: Divergent patterns in growth, hierarchy and specialisation. Urban Studies, 43, 1301–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1973). The trend of social movements in America: Professionalization and resource mobilization. Morristown: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (2000). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 810–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moulaert, F., Demuynck, H., & Nussbaumer, J. (2004). Urban renaissance: From physical beautification to social empowerment. CITY, 8, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Reese, L. A., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (forthcoming). Comparative civic culture. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Salée, D. (2003). Transformative politics: The state and the politics of social change in Quebec. In W. Clement & L. F. Vosko (Eds.), Changing Canada (pp. 25–50). Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sassen, S. (Ed.). (2002). Global networks, linked cities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Scott, A., Agnew, J., Soja, E. W., & Storper, M. (2001). Global city-regions. In A. Scott (Ed.), Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy (pp. 11–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stone, C. S. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta (1946–1988). Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stone, C. N. (2004). It’s more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stone, C. N. (2005). Looking back to look forward: Reflections on urban regime analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 309–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tilly, C. (1984). Social movements and national politics. In C. Bright & S. Harding (Eds.), Statemaking and social movements (pp. 297–317). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Walshok, M. L., Furtek, E., Lee, C. W. B., & Windham, P. H. (2002). Building regional innovation capacity: The San Diego experience. Industry and Higher Education, 16, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wolfe, D. (2002). Social capital and clusters development in learning regions. In A. Holbrook & D. Wolfe (Eds.), Knowledge, clusters and regional innovation (pp. 11–38). Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography/Centre de recherche sur les innovations sociales (CRISES)Université du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Télé-université/Centre de recherche sur les innovations sociales (CRISES)Université du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations