GeoJournal

, Volume 75, Issue 4, pp 373–385 | Cite as

Achmed the dead terrorist and humor in popular geopolitics

  • Darren Purcell
  • Melissa Scott Brown
  • Mahmut Gokmen
Article

Abstract

The critical geopolitics literature has engaged popular culture and media in many forms, usually focused on mass media or elite-produced niche media. The issue of humor as a form of popular culture with geopolitical content has been explored only recently by geographers. This paper utilizes disposition theory, with its emphasis on social context, to link humor and geopolitical analyses of humor. The analysis of two Jeff Dunham comedy skits centering on the character Achmed the Dead Terrorist demonstrates the utility of disposition theory as a construct to situate humor in the context of its original production and as a fluid, global phenomenon that is shared through various social networks via the Internet.

Keywords

Critical geopolitics Disposition theory Humor Popular culture Popular geopolitics 

References

  1. Alderman, D. H. (2006). Rednecks, bluenecks, and hickphonics: Southern humor on the electronic frontier. In E. J. Piancentino (Ed.), The enduring legacy of old southwest humor (pp. 261–278). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alderman, D. H., & Popke, E. J. (2002). Humor and film in the geography classroom: Learning from Michael Moore’s TV nation. Journal of Geography, 101(6), 228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Anees, M. (2006). Suicide bombing cannot bring salvation: An Islamic perspective. New Perspectives Quarterly, 23(3), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, J. (2007). Humor on the next frontier: Youth, online political humor, and the JibJab effect. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. (2006). The daily show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy and American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Billig, M. (2001a). Humour and embarassment: Limits on ‘Nice-Guy’ theories of social life. Theory, Culture and Society, 18(5), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Billig, M. (2001b). Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse and Society, 12(3), 267–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boak, J. (2007). Comedy for dummies: Ventriloquist Jeff Dunham brings suitcase-full of friends to Stranahan theater. The Blade. October 18, p. E3.Google Scholar
  11. Boskin, J. (1987). The complicity of humor: The life and death of Sambo. In J. Morreall (Ed.), The philosophy of humor and laughter (pp. 250–263). New York: State of New York University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, D., & Bryant, J. (1983). Humor in mass media. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), The handbook of humor research, applied studies, Vol. II (pp. 143–172). NewYork: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Carnes, J. (2007) Ventriloquist Dunham talks out of both sides of his mouth. The Sacramento Bee. September 21, p. TK8.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, A. J. (1983). Humor and laughter in social interaction and some implications for humor research. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), The handbook of humor research, Vol. I (pp. 135–158). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, M. (1987). Humor and incongruity. In J. Morreall (Ed.), The philosophy of humor & laughter (pp. 139–155). New York: State of New York University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Culcasi, K., & Gokmen, M. (2009). The face of danger: The beard in the U.S. media representations of the Middle East. AETHER: Journal of Media Geography (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  17. Davies, C. (1990). Ethnic humor around the world: A comparative analysis. Bloomington, IN and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. de Sousa, R. (1987). When is it wrong to laugh? In J. Morreall (Ed.), The philosophy of humor and laughter (pp. 226–249). New York: State of New York University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Deibert, R. (1997). Parchment, printing, and hypermedia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Diamond, M. (2002). No laughing matter: Post-September 11 political cartoons in Arab/Muslim newspapers. Political Communication, 19, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dittmer, J. (2005). Captain America’s empire: Reflections on identity, popular culture and geopolitics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(3), 626–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dittmer, J., & Dodds, K. (2008). Popular geopolitics past and future: Fandom, identities and audiences. Geopolitics, 13(3), 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dodds, K. (2006). Popular geopolitics and audience dispositions: James Bond and the internet movie database (IMDb). Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dodds, K. (2007). Steve Bell’s eye: Cartoons, popular geopolitics and the war on terror. Security Dialogue, 38(2), 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fine, G. A. (1983). Sociological approaches to the study of humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), The handbook of humor research, Vol. I (pp. 159–182). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Fox, J., Koloen, G., & Sahin, V. (2007). No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 Presidential election campaign. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 51, 213–227.Google Scholar
  27. Gillman, B. (2007). Puppet master—Comic/Ventriloquist brings act to Utah. Standard-Examiner. October 18, 2007. (Section: GO., No page given) Accessed via NewsBank October 15, 2008.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, S., Keeter, L., & Williamson, J. (1993). Toward an understanding of humor as popular culture in American society. The Journal of American Culture, 16(2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hollander, B. (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49(4), 402–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hugill, P. (2008). German great-power relations in the pages of “Simplicissimus”. The Geographical Review. 1896–1914, 98(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  31. Hussain, A. J. (2007). The media’s role in a clash of misconceptions: The case of the Danish Muhammad cartoons. The Harvard Journal of Press/Politics, 12(4), 112–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuus, M. (2008). Svejkian geopolitics: Subversive obedience in central Europe. Geopolitics, 13(2), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LaFave, L., Haddad, J., & Maesen, W. A. (1976). Superiority, enhanced self-esteem, and perceived incongruity humour theory. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 63–92). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Martin, M. W. (1987). Humor and aesthetic enjoyment of incongruities. In J. Morreall (Ed.), The philosophy of humor & laughter (pp. 172–186). New York: State of New York University Press.Google Scholar
  35. McDonnell, B. (2008). Puppets’ purpose more than laughs—entertainment—ventriloquist wants audience to care. The Oklahoman. October 3, 2008. P. 9D.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, J. R. (2008). Comedian defends ‘Achmed the Dead Terrorist’ Puppet routine against South African Ban. Fox News http://www.foxnews.come/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,431866,00.html.
  37. Mintz, L. E. (1983). Humor and popular culture. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), The handbook of humor research, applied studies, Vol. II (pp. 129–142). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Mintz, L. E. (1985). Standup comedy as social and cultural mediation. American Quarterly, 37(1), 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore, T. E., Griffiths, K., & Payne, B. (1987). Gender, attitudes towards women, and the appreciation of sexist humor. Sex Roles, 16(9/10), 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morreall, J. (1987). A new theory of laughter. In J. Morreall (Ed.), The philosophy of humor and laughter (pp. 128–138). New York: State of New York University Press.Google Scholar
  41. National Annenberg Election Survey. (2004). Daily show viewers knowledgeable about presidential campaign, National Annenberg election survey shows. September 21. http://web.archive.org/web/20050308165738/http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/naes/2004_03_late-night-knowledge-2_9-21_pr.pdf. Accessed November 6, 2008.
  42. Niven, D., Lichter, R., & Amundson, D. (2003). The political content of late-night comedy. Press/Politics, 8(3), 118–133.Google Scholar
  43. Nyroos, L. (2001). Religeopolitics: Dissident geopolitics and the ‘fundamentalism’ of Hamas and Kach. Geopolitics, 6(3), 135–157.Google Scholar
  44. Olesen, T. (2007). Contentious cartoons: Elite and media-driven mobilization. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
  45. Power, M., & Crampton, A. (Eds.). (2007). Cinema and popular geo-politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Raney, A. A. (2003). Disposition-based theories of enjoyment. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewaoldson, & J. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 61–84). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  47. Raney, A. A. (2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 348–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson, V. M. (1983). Humor and health. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), The handbook of humor research, Vol. II (pp. 109–128). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  49. Romero, E., & Pescosolido, A. (2008). Humor and group effectiveness. Human Relations, 61(3), 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rothbart, M. K. (1976). Incongruity, problem-solving and laughter. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research and application (pp. 37–54). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Rothbaum, R. (2002). These dummies talk back. Poughkeepsie Journal. November 15, p. J05.Google Scholar
  52. Saunders, R. A. (2008). The Ummah as nations: A reappraisal in the wake of the ‘Cartoons Affair’. Nations and Nationalism, 14(2), 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharp, J. (2000). Condensing the cold war: Reader’s digest and American identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  54. Shifman, L., Coleman, S., & Ward, S. (2007). Only joking? Online humour in the 2005 UK general election. Information, Communication and Society, 10(4), 465–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smuts, A. (2006). Humor. The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.iep.utm.edu/h/humor.htm.
  56. Tsai, M. (2007). Honey, I’m Dead!: How god rewards a female suicide bomber. www.slate.com. Accessed November 5, 2008.
  57. Wolff, H., Smith, C., & Murray, H. (1934). The psychology of humor. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28(4), 341–365.Google Scholar
  58. Zillmann, D. (1983). Disparagement humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), The handbook of humor research, Vol. II (pp. 85–108). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  59. Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1976). A disposition theory of humour and mirth. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications (pp. 93–116). London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Internet Sources

  1. Dunham, J. (n.d.) 2008 Achmed the dead terrorist. Accessed April 1, 2008. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgRPc7d9GPoandfeature=related.
  2. Dunham, J. (n.d.) 2008 Jingle bombs. Accessed April 1, 2008. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7B-cHSy8F0.
  3. All Comments. Achmed the Dead Terrorist. (2008). Accessed October 20, 2008. http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_commentsandv=1uwOL4rB-goandfromurl=/watch%3Fv%3D1uwOL4rB-go.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren Purcell
    • 1
  • Melissa Scott Brown
    • 1
  • Mahmut Gokmen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations