Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 67–83 | Cite as

Container ports, local benefits and transportation worker earnings

  • Peter V. HallEmail author
Article

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, containerization has both enabled and reflected the articulation of increasingly concentrated and complex global trade flows. Once close infrastructural, economic and institutional ties between seaports and port cities have been loosened, since major ports now serve producers and consumers in widely dispersed hinterlands. This process has been especially intense in North America, where west coast ports serve markets across the continent. At the same time, many of the external costs of increased port activity are incurred in port cities. Hence, questions about the changing nature of employment in port and related goods-handling sectors have become increasingly important for understanding the share of economic benefits received by port cities. This paper focuses on the effects of containerization, and related changes in transportation regulation, on port-logistics worker earnings in major United States port cities since 1975. A difference-in-differences framework is used to examine the relative annual earnings of dock, trucking and warehouse workers in major container port cities. The analysis shows that, with notable exceptions, port-logistics worker earnings in major container ports are not necessarily higher than those of comparable workers. The findings provide further insights into the strained relationship between seaports and port cities in the era of containerization and economic globalization.

Keywords

Containerization Dockworkers Earnings Port cities Trucking United States Warehousing 

References

  1. AAPA. (2007). U.S./Canada container traffic in TEUs (1980–2006). American Association of Port Authorities. Accessed 13 November 2007. http://www.aapa-ports.org/home.cfm.
  2. Bonacich, E., & Wilson, J. (2007). Getting the goods: Ports, labor, and the logistics revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. BTS (Bureau of Transportation Statistics). (2006). Freight in America. Washington: US Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  4. de Langen, P. W. (2007). The economic performance of seaport regions. In J. Wang, D. Olivier, T. Notteboom & B. Slack (Eds.), Ports, cities, and global supply chains. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Dicken, P. (2003). Global shift: Reshaping the global economic map in the 21st century (4th ed.). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, P. V. (2007). Seaports, urban sustainability and paradigm shift. Journal of Urban Technology, 14(2), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, P. V., & Robbins, G. (2007). Which link, which chain? Inserting Durban into global automotive supply chains. In J. Wang, D. Olivier, T. Notteboom & B. Slack (Eds.), Ports, cities, and global supply chains. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Herod, A. (2001). Labor geographies. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Hesse, M. (2006). Global chain, local pain: Regional implications of global distribution networks in the German north range. Growth and Change, 37(4), 570–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirsch, B. T. (1988). Trucking regulation, unionization and labor earnings: 1973–1985. Journal of Human Resources, 23, 296–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirsch, B., & Macpherson, D. (1997). Earnings and employment in trucking: Deregulating a naturally competitive industry. In J. Peoples (Ed.), Regulatory reform and labor markets. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Husing, J. E. (2004). Logistics and distribution: An answer to regional upward social mobility. Report by Economics and Politics Inc. for the Southern California Association of Governments.Google Scholar
  13. Levinson, M. (2006). The box: How the shipping container made the world smaller and the world economy bigger. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. McCalla, R. J. (1999). Global change, local pain: Intermodal seaport terminals and their service areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 7, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Milkman, R. (2006). L.A. story: Immigrant workers and the future of the U.S. labor movement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Monaco, K., & Grobar, L. (2004). A study of drayage at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Report No. AR04-01-2005-5. Metrans: California Department of Transportation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  17. Monaco, K., & Olsson, L. (undated). Labor at the ports: A comparison of the ILA and ILWU. Unpublished paper, Department of Economics, California State University, Long Beach.Google Scholar
  18. Noponen, H., Markusen, A., & Driessen, K. (1997). Trade and American cities: Who has the comparative advantage? Economic Development Quarterly, 11(1), 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2005). Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olivier, D., & Slack, B. (2006). Rethinking the port. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1409–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peoples, J. (1998). Deregulation and the labor market. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 111–130.Google Scholar
  22. Peoples, J., & Talley, W. K. (2004). Owner-operator truck driver earnings and employment: Port cities and deregulation. In J. Peoples & W. K. Talley (Eds.), Transportation labor issues and regulatory reform, research in transportation economics (Vol. 10). Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  23. POLA. (2007). Economic impact. Port of Los Angeles. Accessed 23 May 2007. http://www.portoflosangeles.org/about_economicimpact.htm.
  24. POLB. (2007). Economic impacts. Port of Long Beach. Accessed 23 May 2007. http://www.polb.com/about/overview/economics.asp.
  25. Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm. Maritime Policy and Management, 29(3), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shashikumar, N., & Schatz, G. L. (2000). The impact of US regulatory changes on international intermodal movements. Transportation Journal, Fall, 5–14.Google Scholar
  27. Slack, B. (1993). Pawns in the game: Ports in a global transportation system. Growth and Change, 24, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Slack, B., & Fremont, A. (2005). Transformation of port terminal operations: From the local to the global. Transport Reviews, 25(1), 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Talley, W. K. (2002). Dockworker earnings, containerisation and shipping deregulation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36, 447–467.Google Scholar
  30. Talley, W. K. (2004). Wage differentials of intermodal transportation carriers and ports: Deregulation versus regulation. Review of Network Economics, 3(2), 207–227.Google Scholar
  31. Wang, D. H. (2006). The ocean shipping reform act: The trans-Atlantic cares. Maritime Policy and Management, 33(1), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Studies ProgramSimon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations