GeoJournal

, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 251–256 | Cite as

Assessing the effects of climate change on the hydrological regime of the Limay River basin

Article
First Online:

Abstract

The electricity generation capacity in the Limay River basin is approximately 26% of the total electrical power generation in Argentina. Assessing the potential effects of climate change on the hydrological regime of this basin is an important issue for water resources management. This study explores the presence of trends in streamflow series, evaluates climate sensitivity and studies the effects on the flow regime of predicted changes in precipitation in the basin. In order to identify and quantify changes in observed streamflow series, the Mann–Kendall test, with a modification for autocorrelated data, and an estimator of the magnitude of the trend are applied. In order to evaluate the sensitivity of streamflow to changes in climate, the concept of elasticity is used. Precipitation elasticity of streamflow is used to quantify the sensitivity of streamflow to changes in precipitation and is estimated using a power law model and a linear statistical model in two sub-basins, Aluminé and Nahuel Huapi. The effects on flow regime of the predicted changes in precipitation under different scenarios are studied. Climatic results for different scenarios of growth in greenhouse gases from some General Circulation Models are used as inputs into the proposed models. The analysis identifies decreasing trends in mean and minimum annual flows and in the low flow season. The estimates of the precipitation elasticity imply that changes in precipitation produce similar changes in streamflow and the climatic results for different scenarios show that the variations are moderate.

Keywords

Climate elasticity Climate variability Climate change Hydrological models Statistical analysis Trend analysis 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The records were supplied by the Subsecretaría de Recursos Hídricos, Argentinean Government, Servicio Meteorológico Nacional and Autoridad Interjurisdiccional de las Cuencas de los Ríos Limay, Neuquén y Negro (AIC).

References

  1. Arnell, N. (1996). Global warming, river flows and water resources. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  2. Cunderlik, J. M., & Burn, D. H. (2002). Local and regional trends in monthly maximum flows in Southern British Columbia. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 27(2), 191–212.Google Scholar
  3. Hamed, K. H., & Rao, A. R. (1998). A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. Journal of Hydrology, 204, 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirsch, R. M., Slack, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1982). Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resources Research, 18(1), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hulme, M., Wigley, T. M. L., Barrow, E. M., Raper, S. C. B., Centella, A., Smith, S., & Chipanshi, A. C. (2000). Using a climate scenario generator for vulnerability and adaptation assessments: MAGICC and SCENGEN Version 2.4 Workbook. Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, U.K.Google Scholar
  6. Kundzewicz, Z. W., Graczyk, D., Maurer, T., Pińskwar, I., Radziejewski, M., Svensson, C., & Szwed, M. (2005). Trend detection in river flow series: 1. Annual maximum flow. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50(5), 797–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., & Wallis, J. R. (1994). Hydro-climatological trends in the continental United States 1948–1988. Journal of Climate, 7(4), 586–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sankarasubramanian, A., Vogel, R. M., & Limbrunner, J. F. (2001). Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States. Water Resources Research, 37(6), 1771–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sankarasubramanian, A., & Vogel, R. M. (2003). Hydroclimatology of the continental United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(7), 1363. doi: 10.1029/2002GL015937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Secretaría de Energía (2004). Informe del Sector Eléctrico Año 2003 Provisorio. Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
  11. Seoane, R. S., Valdés, J. B., & Mata, L. J. (2005). Climate variability and climate change in Patagonian Rivers. In T. Wagener, S. Franks, H. Gupta, E. Bogh, L. Bastidas, C. Nobre, & C. De Oliveira Galvao (Eds.), Regional hydrological impacts of climate change-impact assessment and decision making (Vol. 295, pp. 26–33). IAHS Publication.Google Scholar
  12. Vogel, R. M., Wilson, I., & Daly, C. (1999). Regional regression models of annual streamflow for the United States. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 125(3), 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Westmacott, J. R., & Burn, D. H. (1997). Climate changes effects on the hydrologic regime within the Churchill-Nelson River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 202(1–4), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wigley, T. M. L., Raper, S. C. B., Smith, S., & Hulme, M. (2000). The MAGICC/SCENGEN climate scenario generator: Version 2.4, technical manual. Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, U.K.Google Scholar
  15. Yue, S., Pilon, P., & Phinney, B. (2003). Canadian streamflow trend detection: Impacts of serial and cross-correlation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48(1), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Water Institute (INA)Provincia de Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.National Research Council (CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations