, Volume 69, Issue 1–2, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Towards settlement science: a research agenda for urban geography

  • David R. RainEmail author


Originally presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers (held in Chicago, Illinois, in March of 2006), this collection of papers addresses issues of human population distribution, specifically the use of new science and technology applications to geolocate precisely where human beings are on the surface of our planet. Ranging from metrics to measure error in global population datasets, to the delicate job of defining neighborhood boundaries both socially and spatially, to the technique of merging census and biophysical data to yield a composite vulnerability map for a hazard-prone area, these articles showcase the growing power of geographic information systems combined with satellite imagery resources to provide a far fuller representation of where we are.

All the papers take as their premise the necessity of going “below” the national level in data specificity to examine conditions closer to the ground. This has the effect of moving the...


  1. Carlson, Scott (2007). On the record, all the time. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, 23(February 9), A31–A35.Google Scholar
  2. Cutter, Susan L. (1996). Societal responses to environmental hazards. International Social Science Journal, 150, 525–536.Google Scholar
  3. Dobson, Jerome (2003). Estimating populations at risk. In Cutter, Susan L., Richardson, Douglas B., Thomas J. Wilbanks (Eds.) The geographical dimensions of terrorism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Doxiadis, Constantinos A. (1968). Ekistics: an introduction to the science of human settlements. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Hannah, Matthew (2001). Sampling and the politics of representation in U.S. Census 2000. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 19(5), 505–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kwan, Mei-Po & Lee, Jiyeong (2004). Geovisualization of human activity patterns using #-D GISL A time-geogaphic approach. In Goodchild Michael, Donald Janelle, (Eds.). Spatially integrated social science. (pp. 48–66). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Mesev, Victor (2003). Remotely sensed cities. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  8. National Research Council (2007). Tools and methods for estimating populations at risk from natural disasters and complex humanitarian crises. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  9. Nissenbaum, Helen (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119–158.Google Scholar
  10. Prewitt, Kenneth (2003). “Politics and science in census taking.” Russell Sage Foundation and the Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  11. United Nations (2000). Handbook on Geographic Information Systems and Digital Mapping. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 79. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  12. U.S. Census Bureau (1994). Geographic areas reference manual. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations