GeoJournal

, Volume 66, Issue 1–2, pp 15–26

Gated communities in England: historical perspectives and current developments

Original Paper

Abstract

It is important to analyse the growth of gated communities and the drivers for their supply and demand, within the context specific to each country’s history. This article uses findings from recent studies of gated communities in England, together with historical material, to explore their typology. It considers the changing social, economic and political conditions which may lead to the emergence of defended collective housing, together with the history of property relations and the concept of public/private land within the English context.

Keywords

English typology Gated communities Historical patterns Socio-legal context 

References

  1. Atkins, P. J. (1993). How the west end was won: the struggle to remove street barriers in Victorian London. Journal of Historical Geography, 19(3), 256–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R., Blandy, S., Flint, J., & Lister, D. (2004). Gated communities in England. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  3. Babb, P. (2005). Focus on social inequality. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blandy, S., & Lister, D. (2005). Gated communities: (Ne)gating community development? Housing Studies, 20(2), 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blandy, S., Lister, D., Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2003). Gated communities: A systematic review of the research evidence (CNR Paper 12). Bristol: ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research.Google Scholar
  8. Collison, P. (1963). The Cutteslowe walls: A study in social class. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  9. Darton, D., Hirsch, D., & Strelitz, J. (2003). Tackling disadvantage. A 20-year enterprise. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Glasze, G. (2003). Segmented governance patterns – fragmented urbanism: The development of guarded housing estates in Lebanon. The Arab World Geographer, 6(2), 79–100.Google Scholar
  12. Lawrence, H. W. (1993). The greening of the squares of London: Transformation of urban landscapes and ideals. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(1), 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marcuse, P. (1997). Walls of fear and walls of support. In N. Ellin (Ed.), Architecture of fear (pp. 101–114). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  14. McKenzie, E. (1998). Homeowner associations and California politics: An exploratory analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 34(1), 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mingay, G. E. (1998). Parliamentary enclosure in England. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Searle, M. (1930). Turnpikes and toll-bars. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  19. The Sheffield Telegraph. (15 May 1925). Estate barrier: Chain removed after seventy-five years.Google Scholar
  20. The Independent. (26 May 2004). Retirement feature, property supplement.Google Scholar
  21. Tomalin, C. (2002) Samuel Pepys: The unequalled self. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  22. Webster, C. (2001). Gated cities of tomorrow. Town Planning Review, 72(2), 149–169.Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, E. (1991). The Sphinx in the city: Urban life, the control of disorder, and women. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of LeedsLeedsUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations