, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Ecotourism and mass tourism in Southern Thailand: Spatial interdependence, structural connections, and staged authenticity

  • Nick Kontogeorgopoulos


The desire to spend leisure time in ‘natural’ settings represents a key factor behind the recent and rapid growth of ecotourism. A search by ecotourists for remote landscapes and locations has shaped the way in which geographers have defined ecotourism, but few scholars have explored, in detail, the mechanics of the spatial relationship between ecotourism and mass tourism, two forms of travel usually considered mutually exclusive in spatial terms. Using the island of Phuket — southern Thailand’s premier resort destination — as a case study, this paper investigates the spatial overlaps and connections between ecotourism and mass tourism and tests the assumption that ecotourism and mass tourism must exist spatially apart in order for the former to succeed. Despite Phuket’s association with mass tourism, and the small physical distances between built-up mass tourist areas and ‘natural’ ecotourism settings, the ‘communicative staging’ of natural authenticity allows ecotourism companies to convey geographical remoteness to tourists. Although ecotourism in Phuket must struggle constantly to overcome the perceptual impact of spatial proximity to resort locations, the tourist markets and business networks of the existing mass tourism industry remain crucial to the survival of ecotourism in this region. Thus, contrary to conventional notions that ecotourism and mass tourism must exist as separate entities, this paper argues that an interconnected, symbiotic, and spatially-contiguous relationship between the two is necessary in the case of Phuket.

Key words

communicative staging ecotourism mass tourism Phuket space staged authenticity Thailand 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boyd S. and Butler R., 1996: Managing ecotourism: An opportunity spectrum approach. Tourism Management 17(8): 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd S., Butler R., Haider W. and Perera A., 1994: Identifying areas for ecotourism in Northern Ontario: Application of a geographical information system methodology. Journal of Applied Recreation Research 19(1): 41–66.Google Scholar
  3. Burton F., 1998: Can ecotourism objectives be achieved? Annals of Tourism Research 25(3): 755–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler R., 1980: The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer 24(1): 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cazes G., 1987: Alternative tourism: Reflections on an ambiguous concept. In: Britton S. and Clarke W. (eds), Ambiguous Alternatives: Tourism in Small Developing Countries, 117–126. University of the South Pacific Press, Suva (Fiji).Google Scholar
  6. Ceballos-Lascurain H., 1988: The future of ecotourism. Mexico Journal January: 13-14.Google Scholar
  7. Ceballos-Lascurain H., 1996: Tourism, Ecotourism, and Protected Areas: The State of Nature-Based Tourism Around the World and the Guidelines for Its Development. IUCN, Cambridge (UK).Google Scholar
  8. Cohen E., 1987: ‘Alternative tourism’: A critique. In: Britton S. and Clarke W. (eds), Ambiguous Alternatives: Tourism in Small Developing Countries, 127–142. University of the South Pacific Press, Suva (Fiji).Google Scholar
  9. Cohen E., 1989: ‘Primitive and remote’: Hill tribe trekking in Thailand. Annals of Tourism Research 16(1): 30–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen E., 1996: Thai Tourism: Hill Tribes, Islands, and Open-Ended Prostitution. White Lotus, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  11. Crouch D., 2000: Places around us: Embodied lay geographies in leisure and tourism. Leisure Studies 19(2): 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis S., 1999: Landscapes of imagination: Tourism in southern California. Pacific Historical Review 68(2): 173–191.Google Scholar
  13. Dearden P., 1991: Tourism and sustainable development in northern Thailand. Geographical Review 81: 400–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dearden P., 1993: Cultural aspects of tourism and sustainable development: Tourism and the hilltribes of northern Thailand. In: Nelson J., Butler R. and Wall G. (eds), Tourism and Sustainable Development: Monitoring, Planning, Management, 165–178. University of Waterloo Department of Geography, Waterloo (Canada).Google Scholar
  15. Dearden P. and Harron S., 1992: Case study: Tourism and the hilltribes of Thailand. In: Weiler B. and Hall C.M. (eds), Special Interest Tourism, 96–104. Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
  16. Dearden P. and Harron S., 1994: Alternative tourism and adaptive change. Annals of Tourism Research 21(1): 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diamantis D., 1999: The concept of ecotourism: Evolution and trends. Current Issues in Tourism 2(2&3): 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowling R., 2000: Ecotourism in Southeast Asia: A golden opportunity for local communities. In: Chon K.S. (ed.), Tourism in Southeast Asia: A New Direction, 1–20. Haworth Hospitality Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Dwyer L. and Edwards D., 2000: Nature-based tourism on the edge of urban development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 8(4): 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fennell D., 1999: Ecotourism: An Introduction. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  21. Fennell D., 2001: A content analysis of ecotourism definitions. Current Issues in Tourism 4(5): 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goffman I., 1959: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Penguin, Harmondsworth (UK).Google Scholar
  23. Higham J. and Lück M., 2002: Urban ecotourism: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Ecotourism 1(1): 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. HLA Consultants and the ARA Consulting Group, 1994: Ecotourism-Nature/Adventure/Culture:Alberta and British Columbia Market Demand Assessment. Prepared for Canadian Heritage, Industry Canada, BC Ministry of Small Business, Tourism and Culture, Alberta Economic Development and Tourism, and the Outdoor Recreation Council of BC.Google Scholar
  25. Honey M., 1999: Ecotourism and Sustainable Development: Who Owns Paradise? Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. Kearsley G., 1997: Wilderness Tourism: A New Rush to Destruction? University of Otago, Dunedin (New Zealand).Google Scholar
  27. Kontogeorgopoulos N., 1998: Roughing it in Phuket, but the Jones’ Haven’t Been There (Yet): Reconceptualizing Tourism and Community Development in Southern Thailand. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Lew A., 1998: The Asia-Pacific ecotourism industry: putting sustainable tourism into practice. In: Hall C.M. and Lew A. (eds), Sustainable Tourism: A Geographical Perspective, 92–106. Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow (UK).Google Scholar
  29. Lindberg K., 1991: Policies for Maximizing Nature Tourism’s Ecological and Economic Benefits. World Resource Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  30. Ludwig H., 1976: Environmentalism and Phuket: A case study. Sawaddi Magazine May/June: 14-17 & 22-25.Google Scholar
  31. MacCannell D., 1976: The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. Schoken Books, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Mowforth M. and Munt I., 1998: Tourism and Sustainability: New Tourism in the Third World. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neale G., 1999: The Green Travel Guide. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  34. Pearce D., 1989: Tourist Development. Longman, Essex (UK).Google Scholar
  35. Pleumarom A., 2001: Mekong Tourism — Model or Mockery? A Case Study on ‘Sustainable Tourism’. Third World Network, Penang (Malaysia).Google Scholar
  36. Shepherd N., 2002: How ecotourism can go wrong: The cases of SeaCanoe and Siam Safari, Thailand. Current Issues in Tourism 5(3): 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sirakaya E., Sasidharan V. and Sonmez S., 1999: Redefining ecotourism: The need for a supply-side view. Journal of Travel Research 38(2): 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith R.A., 1992: Beach resort evolution: Implications for planning. Annals of Tourism Research 19(2): 304–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT), 1997: Internal Documents from Statistics and Research Division (given to author at TAT headquarters, Bangkok).Google Scholar
  40. Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT), 2003a: Domestic tourism in Phuket 2001. Tourism Authority of Thailand, Southern Office, Region 4. Http:// [7 February 2003].Google Scholar
  41. Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT), 2003b: Domestic tourism in Phuket 2002. Tourism Authority of Thailand, Southern Office, Region 4. Http:// [7 February 2003].Google Scholar
  42. Uthoff D., 1997: Out of the tin crisis into the tourism boom: The transformation of the tropical island of Phuket by international tourism. Applied Geography and Development 49: 7–31.Google Scholar
  43. Vannisse M., 1996: The politics of drowning in Phuket. Thailand Times August 23: A5.Google Scholar
  44. Wallace G. and Pierce S., 1996: An evaluation of ecotourism in Amazonas, Brazil. Annals of Tourism Research 23(4): 843–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weaver D., 2001a: Ecotourism. John Wiley and Sons, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  46. Weaver D., 2001b: Ecotourism as mass tourism: Contradiction or reality? Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 42(2): 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weaver D., 2002a: Asian ecotourism: Patterns and themes. Tourism Geographies 4(2): 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weaver D., 2002b: The evolving concept of ecotourism and its potential impacts. International Journal of Sustainable Development 5(3): 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wight P., 1993: Ecotourism: Ethics or eco-sell? Journal of Travel Research 31(3): 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ziffer K., 1989: Ecotourism: The Uneasy Alliance. Conservation International, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Kontogeorgopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Comparative Sociology and International Political Economy ProgramUniversity of Puget SoundTacomaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations