Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 13–21 | Cite as

Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig

  • Marco Bontje
Article

Abstract

In the early 20th century, the East German city of Leipzig seemed well on its way to become a metropolis of international importance. The city was expected to grow towards over one million inhabitants in 2000. Seventy years later, Leipzig’s population has shrunk to less than 500,000 inhabitants instead. The German partition after World War II took away most of its national administrative and economic functions and much of its hinterland. The socialist GDR regime worsened the long-term development perspectives and living circumstances of the city. The German reunification brought new development chances, but like most East German cities, Leipzig’s hopes soon became disappointed. The local politicians faced a difficult redevelopment task: apart from the question how to revive the local and regional economy, they also had to deal with a housing vacancy rate of 20%, a huge need for renovation in the older neighbourhoods as well as in the socialist high-rise areas, the negative effects of urban sprawl on the city core, and various environmental pollution problems. After briefly describing the development path of Leipzig until the 1990s, the paper will discuss the current attempts of the city government to give Leipzig a more positive post-industrial future. On the one hand, Leipzig is developing a strategy to ‘downsize’ the city’s built environment and infrastructure to adapt to a probably lastingly smaller population. On the other hand, many growth instruments well known from the international scientific and political debate are tried to put Leipzig back on the (inter)national map. The paper will discuss these development strategies in the light of the international debate on the question ‘how to fight the shrinking city’, with specific attention for post-socialist cities.

Key words

East Germany Leipzig shrinking city urban development strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bathelt, H., 2002: The re-emergence of a media-industry cluster in Leipzig. European Planning Studies 10: 583–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg L. van den et al., 1982: Urban Europe, a study of growth and decline. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Berkner A., 2000: The lignite industry and the reclamation of land — developments in the Rhenish, Central German and Lusatian mining areas since 1989. In: Mayr A. and W. Taubmann (eds), Germany ten years after reunification, 186–201. Institut für Länderkunde (Beiträge zur Regionalen Geographie 52), Leipzig.Google Scholar
  4. Boyle R., 2003: Imagining the impossible — planning for central city decline. Paper presented at the conference ‘The future of deindustrialising regions’, Dortmund, 13–15 July.Google Scholar
  5. Burdack J. and Rudolph R., 2001: Postsozialistische Stadtentwicklungen zwischen nachholender Modernisierung und eigenem Weg. Geographica Helvetica 56: 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BVBW/BBR, 2003: Dokumentation zum Bundeswettbewerb ‘Stadtumbau Ost’ — für lebenswerte Städte und attraktives Wohnen. Bundesministerium für Verkehr-, Bau- und Wohnungswesen/Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Berlin/Bonn.Google Scholar
  7. Castells M., 1993: European cities, the informational society, and the global economy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 84: 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheshire P., Carbonara G. and Hay D., 1986: Problems of urban decline and growth in EC countries; or measuring degrees of elephantness. Urban Studies 23: 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dezernat Planung und Bau 1999: Stadtentwicklungsplan gewerbliche Bauflächen. Stadt Leipzig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  10. Dezernat Planung und Bau, 2000: Stadtentwicklungsplan Wohnungsbau und Stadterneuerung. Stadt Leipzig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  11. Doehler M. and Usbeck H., 1996: Eine zerrissene Stadt? StadtBauWelt 87: 690–695.Google Scholar
  12. Evans L., Johnson P. and Thomas, B. (eds), 1995: The Northern region economy — progress and prospects in the North of England. Mansell, London.Google Scholar
  13. Florida R. and Gates G., 2001: Technology and tolerance; the importance of diversity to high-technology growth. Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Glock B., 2002: Schrumpfende Städte. Berliner Debatte Initial 13(2): 3–10.Google Scholar
  15. Graham, S. and Marvin S., 2001: Splintering urbanism. Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, London/New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimm F.D., 1995: Return to normal — Leipzig in search of its future position in Central Europe. GeoJournal 36: 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grundmann L., Tzschaschel S. and Wollkopf M. (eds), 1996: Leipzig — ein geographischer Führer durch Stadt und Umland. Thom Verlag, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  18. Hall P. and Hay D., 1980: Growth centres in the European urban system. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  19. Häussermann H., 1996: From the socialist to the capitalist city; experiences from Germany. In: Andrusz G., Harloe M. and Szelenyi I. (eds), Cities after socialism. Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies, 214–231. Blackwell, Oxford/Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Herfert G., 2002: Disurbanisierung und Reurbanisierung — polarisierte Raumentwicklung in der ostdeutschen Schrumpfungslandschaft. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 60: 334–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herfert G. and Röhl D., 2001: Leipzig — Region zwischen Boom und Leerstand. In: Brake K., Dangschat J.S. and Herfert G. (eds), Suburbanisierung in Deutschland, 151–162. Leske + Budrich, Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hohenberg P.M. and Lees L.H., 1985: The making of urban Europe 1000–1950. Harvard, Cambridge/London.Google Scholar
  23. Kovacs Z., 2000: Cities from state socialism to global capitalism; an introduction. GeoJournal 49: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lang T. and Tenz E., 2003: Von der schrumpfenden Stadt zur Lean City. Prozesse und Auswirkungen der Stadtschrumpfung in Ostdeutschland und deren Bewältigung. Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau-und Planungs-literatur, Dortmund.Google Scholar
  25. Leipziger Blätter, 2000: Leipzig — Den Wandel zeigen. Sonderheft Expo 2000. Kulturstiftung Leipzig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  26. Leo C. and Brown W., 2000: Slow growth and urban development policy. Journal of Urban Affairs 22: 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Logan J.R. and Molotch H.L., 1987: The city as a growth machine. Reprinted in: Fainstein S. and Campbell S. (eds), Readings in urban theory, 2nd ed. 2002, 199–238. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Lutz W., O’Neill B.C. and Scherbov S., 2003: Europe’s population at a turning point. Science 299: 1991–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyer B. and Klatt S., 2002: Zusamenfassung des BMBF-Zukunftforums ‘Herausforderung schrumpfende Stadt’ am 13.06.2002 in Leipzig. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung/Stadt Leipzig, Berlin/Leipzig.Google Scholar
  30. Middleton M., 1991: Cities in transition. The transformation of Britain’s inner cities. Joseph, London.Google Scholar
  31. Nuissl H. and Rink D., 2002: Urban sprawl and post-socialist transformation — the case of Leipzig (Germany). UFZ-Bericht 4/2003. UFZ Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  32. Reclus, 1989: Les villes Européennes. DATAR, Aubervillers.Google Scholar
  33. Robson B., Parkinson M., Boddy M. and Maclennan D., 2000: The state of English cities. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.Google Scholar
  34. Sassen S., 2002: Cities in a world economy. Reprinted in: Fainstein S. and Campbell S. (eds), Readings in urban theory, 2nd ed. 2002, 32–56. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. Savitch H.V. and Kantor P., 2003: Urban strategies for a global era, a cross national comparison. American Behavioral Scientist 46: 1002–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shaw R., 2002: The International Building Exhibition (IBA) Emscher Park, a model for sustainable restructuring? European Planning Studies 10: 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stadt Leipzig, Amt für Statistik und Wahlen (2003): Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003. Stadt Leipzig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  38. Swyngedouw E., Moulaert F. and Rodriguez A., 2003: ‘The world in a grain of sand’; large-scale urban development projects and the dynamics of ‘glocal’ transformations. In: Moulaert F., Swyngedouw E. and Rodriguez A. (eds), The globalized city. Economic restructuring and social polarization in European cities, 9–28. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Szelenyi I., 1996: Cities under socialism — and after. In: Andrusz G., Harloe M. and Szelenyi I. (eds), Cities after socialism, 286–317. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Usbeck H., 1996: Entwicklungen und Probleme der Agglomerationsräume in Deutschland — Fallstudie Leipzig. In: ARL, Agglomerationsräume in Deutschland. Ansichten, Einsichten, Aussichten, 304–324. Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Hannover.Google Scholar
  41. Wiechmann T., 2003: Between spectacular projects and pragmatic reconstruction — conversion strategies of contracting urban regions in Europe. Paper presented at the conference ‘The future of deindustrialising regions’, Dortmund, 13–15 July.Google Scholar
  42. Wiest K., 1998: Der Leipziger Wohnungsmarkt; Teilmärkte und sozialräumliche Differenzierungen. Europa Regional 6(3): 34–45.Google Scholar
  43. Winkel R., 2002: Schrumpfung und ihre siedlungsstrukturelle Wirkungen. RaumPlanung 101: 99–103.Google Scholar
  44. Zukin S., 1991: Landscapes of power, from Detroit to Disney World. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Bontje
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Planning, Faculty of Social and Behavioural SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.Leibniz Institut für LänderkundeLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations