GeoJournal

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 381–393

The land-use projections and resulting emissions in the IPCC SRES scenarios scenarios as simulated by the IMAGE 2.2 model

  • Bart Strengers
  • Rik Leemans
  • Bas Eickhout
  • Bert de Vries
  • Lex Bouwman
Article

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) developed a new series of emission scenarios (SRES). Six global models were used to develop SRES but most focused primarily on energy and industry related emissions. Land-use emissions were only covered by three models, where IMAGE included the most detailed, spatially explicit description of global land-use and land-cover dynamics. To complement their calculations the other models used land-use emission from AIM and IMAGE, leading to inconsistent estimates. Representation of the land-use emissions in SRES is therefore poor. This paper presents details on the IMAGE 2.1 land-use results to complement the SRES report. The IMAGE SRES scenarios are based on the original IPCC SRES assumptions and narratives using the latest version of IMAGE (IMAGE 2.2). IMAGE provides comprehensive emission estimates because not only emissions are addressed but also the resulting atmospheric concentrations, c1imate change and impacts. Additionally, in SRES the scenario assumptions were only presented and quantified for 4 “macro-regions”. The IMAGE 2.2 SRES implementation has been extended towards 17 regions. We focus on land-use aspects and show that land-related emissions not only depend on population projections but also on the temporal and spatial dynamics of different land-related sources and sinks of greenhouse gases. We also illustrate the importance of systemic feed backs and interactions in the c1imate system that influence land-use emissions, such as deforestation and forest regrowth, soil respiration and CO2-fertilisation.

Keywords

Land-use change land-use emissions SRES IPCC climate change IMAGE model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alcamo, J., Leemans, R., Kreileman, E. 1998Global Change Scenarios of the 21st century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 model.Pergamon & Elseviers ScienceLondon296Google Scholar
  2. Bouwman, A.F., Fung, I., Matthews, E., John, J. 1993Global analysis of the potential for N2O production in natural soils.Global Biogeochemical Cycles7557597Google Scholar
  3. Bouwman, A.F., Taylor, J.A., Kroeze, C. 2000Testing hypotheses on global emissions of nitrous oxide using atmospheric models.Chemosphere–Global Change2475492Google Scholar
  4. CPB 1999: WorldScan: The Core Version. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague 137 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Cramer, W., Kicklighter, D.W., Bondeau, A., Moore, B., Churkina, C., Nemry, B., Ruimy, A., Schloss, A.L. 1999Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key resultsGlobal Change Biology5115Google Scholar
  6. FAO 2000: Agriculture towards 2015/30. Technical Interim Report X7027/E, Global Perspective Studies Unit, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  7. Hilderink H.B.M, 1999: Population in transition: an integrated regional modeling framework. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Groningen, Groningen (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Houghton, J.T.Ding, Y.Griggs, D.Noguer, M.Dai, P.J.der Linden, X.Maskell, K.Johnson, C.A. eds. 2001The Science of Climate ChangeCambridge University PressCambridge, 881 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. IMAGE team, 2001a: The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios: a comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century. RIVM CD-ROM Publication 481508018, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven.Google Scholar
  10. IMAGE team 2001b: The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios: climate change scenarios resulting from runs with several GCMs. RIVM CD-ROM Publication 481508019, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven.Google Scholar
  11. IPCC1997Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change/Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentParisGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC2001Climate change 2001: synthesis reportCambridge University PressParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Kainuma, M., Matsuoka, Y., Morita, T. 2002Climate Policy Assessment: Asia-Pacific Integrated ModelingTokyoSpringerGoogle Scholar
  14. Kreileman, G.J.J., Bouwman, A.F. 1994Computing land use emissions of greenhouse gasesWater Air Soil Pollution76231258Google Scholar
  15. Lashof D.A. and Tirpak D.A., 1990: Policy Options for Stabilizing global climate. Report to Congress. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington D.C. 545 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Leemans, R., Eickhout, B.J., Strengers, B., Bouwman, A.F., Schaeffer, M. 2002The consequences for the terrestrial carbon cycle of uncertainties in land use, climate and vegetation responses in the IPCC SRES scenariosScience in China, Series C.45126136Google Scholar
  17. Leggett, J., Pepper, W.J., Swart, R.J. 1992

    Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: an update.

    Houghton, J.T.Callander, B.A.Varney, S.K. eds. Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment.Cambridge University PressCambridge.7195
    Google Scholar
  18. Mosier, A.R., Kroeze, C., Nevison, C., Oenema, O., Seitzinger, S., Cleemput, O.V. 1998Closing the global atmospheric N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycleNutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems52225248Google Scholar
  19. Nakicenovic N., Alcamo J. Davis G. de Vries B. Fenhann J. Gaffin S. Gregory K., Grübler A., Jung T.Y., Kram T., Emilio la Rovere E., Michaelis L., Mori S., Morita T., Pepper W., Pitcher H., Price L. Riahi K. Roehrl A. Rogner H.H., Sankovski A., Schlesinger M., Shukla P., Smith S., Swart R., van Rooyen S., Victor N. and Dadi Z., 2000: Special Report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 599 pp.Google Scholar
  20. WRR 1992: Grond voor keuzen. Vier perspectieven voor de landelijke gebieden in de Europesche Gemeenschap. Rapporten aan de Regering 34, Den Haag, 147 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bart Strengers
    • 1
  • Rik Leemans
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bas Eickhout
    • 1
  • Bert de Vries
    • 1
  • Lex Bouwman
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)BilthovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Environmental Systems Analysis GroupWageningen URWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations