GeoInformatica

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 409–434 | Cite as

Towards dynamic behavior-based profiling for reducing spatial information overload in map browsing activity

  • Eoin Mac Aoidh
  • Michela Bertolotto
  • David C. Wilson
Article

Abstract

The quantity of available detailed spatial content over the Web is continually growing. This leads to the problems of information overload and lengthy map download and render times. In order to address these problems in an effective and unobtrusive manner, the available content must be implicitly filtered and prioritized according to the user’s interests. Personalization of the user’s map elides less relevant information and prioritizes relevant information. The authors previously introduced a novel technique for detailed behavior-based spatial profiling. This article provides an analysis of the technique while exploring the properties of user interactions with a typical Web-based map browsing system. A technique for the automatic identification of specific interaction patterns is introduced and explored in a bid to improve current behavior-based map personalization techniques. The goal of this work is to move towards real-time profiling to support spatial dataset personalization, thus improving the user experience by reducing information overload.

Keywords

Spatial information overload Geographic information systems Map browsing User interfaces Spatial filters 

References

  1. 1.
    Mac Aoidh E, Bertolotto M, Wilson DC (2008) Understanding geospatial interests by visualising map interaction behaviour. Information Visualisation 7(3–4):257–286, PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mac Aoidh E, Wilson DC, Bertolotto M (2009) A study of spatial interaction behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on web and wireless geographical information systems (W2GIS09), Maynooth, Ireland. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 120–134. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mac Aoidh E, Bertolotto M, Wilson DC (2007) Analysis of implicit interest indicators for spatial data. In: Short paper in proceedings of ACMGIS’07, pp 336–339. Seattle, Washington, USA, 7–9 November 2007Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nivala A-M, Brewster S, Sarjakoski TL (2008) Usability evaluation of web mapping sites. Cartogr J 45(2):129–138, ManeyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson CR, Domingos P, Weld DS (2007) Personalizing web sites for mobile users. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM international conference on world wide web, pp 565–575, Hong Kong, 1–5 May 2007Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eisenstein J, Vanderdonckt J, Puerta AR (2001) Applying model-based techniques to the development of UIs for mobile computers. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international conference on intelligent user interfaces (IUI’01), Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, pp 69–76Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bickmore TW, Schilit BN (1997) Digestor: device-independent access to the world wide web. In: Selected papers from the sixth international conference on world wide web, Santa Clara, California, USA, pp 1075–1082Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fischer G (1999) User modeling: the long and winding road. In: Proceedings of the user modelling conference 1999 (UM’99). Springer, Canada, pp 349-355Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer G (2001) User modeling in human-computer interaction. In: 10th anniversary issue of user modeling and user-adapted interaction, vol 11, pp 65–86. KluwerGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hirose M, Hiramoto R, Sumiya K (2007) GeminiMap—geographical enhanced map interface for navigation on the internet. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on web and wireless geographical information systems (W2GIS07). Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cardiff, UK, pp 279–292Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilson D, Weakliam J, Bertolotto M (2010) Personalizing map content to improve task completion efficiency. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(5):741–760, Taylor and Francis, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Claypool M, Le P, Waseda M, Brown D (2001) Implicit interest indicators. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on intelligent user interfaces (IUI’01), Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, pp 33–40Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tezuka T, Tanaka K (2007) Presentation of dynamic maps by estimating user intentions from operation history. In: Proceedings of the 13th international multimedia modeling conference (MMM2007). Springer, Singapore, pp 156–165Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pan B, Hembrooke H, Gay G, Granka L, Feusner M, Newman J (2004) The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye tracking study. In: Proceedings of the 2004 symposium on eye tracking research and applications (ETRA), San Antonio, Texas, USA, pp 147–154Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poole A, Ball LJ (2003) Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: current status and future prospects. In: The mind’s eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, Elsevier Science. Available at http://www.alexpoole.info/academic/Poole&Ball%20EyeTracking.pdf
  16. 16.
    Cox AL, Silva MM (2006) The role of mouse movements in interactive search. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual CogSci conference, pp 1156–1162, Vancouver, Canada, 26–29 July 2006Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen MC, Anderson JR, Sohn MH (2001) What can a mouse cursor tell us more? Correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’01), Seattle, Washington, USA, pp 281–282Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mueller F, Lockerd A (2002) Cheese: tracking mouse movement activity on websites a tool for user modeling. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’02), Seattle, Washington, USA, pp 279–280Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arroyo E, Selker T, Wei W (2006) Usability tool for analysis of web designs using mouse tracks. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’06) extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Québec, Canada, pp 484–489Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    MacEachren AM (1995) How maps work. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nielsen J (1994) Guerilla HCI: using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. In: Dias RG, Mayhew DJ (1994) Cost-justifying usability. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mac Aoidh E, Bertolotto M, Wilson D (2007) Implicit profiling for contextual reasoning about user’s spatial preferences. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on case based reasoning and context-awareness (held in conjunction with 7th international conference on case-based reasoning, ICCBR’07), pp 177–184. Belfast, Northern Ireland, 13–16 August 2007Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McMaster RB, Shea KS (1992) Generalization in digital cartography. Assoc of American Geographers, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tversky B (1993) Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In: Spatial information theory a theoretical basis for GIS. Lecture notes in computer science, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hegarty M, Canham M, Fabrikant SI (2010) Thinking about the weather: how display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. J Exper Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 36(1):37–53, American Psychological AssociationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eoin Mac Aoidh
    • 1
  • Michela Bertolotto
    • 1
  • David C. Wilson
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and InformaticsUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Department of Software and Information SystemsUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations