, 13:291 | Cite as

Automated tools within workflows for 3D structural construction from surface and subsurface data

  • O. FernandezEmail author
  • S. Jones
  • N. Armstrong
  • G. Johnson
  • A. Ravaglia
  • J. A. Muñoz


Mainstream techniques for the construction of 3D geological models frequently rely on high-density subsurface datasets, such as 3D seismic surveys or dense 2D seismic grids. In settings where the available geological and/or geophysical data are relatively sparse, the construction of a consistent 3D structural framework is seldom straightforward and is strongly dependent on the optimization of the use of surface data. To deal with this challenge, workflows for constructing 3D models from sparse surface data have been proposed by multiple authors. This paper presents three automated techniques which optimize the use of data and enhance the time-efficiency of 3D model construction: 3D geological contact analysis, 3D dip-domain construction, and 3D isopach measurement and construction.


Structural modeling Orientation analysis Dip-domain Isopach 



The authors wish to thank Paul Griffiths for his valuable feedback on the manuscript and in the development of the techniques discussed. 3DMove software courtesy of Midland Valley. Software tool development funded by BG Group. Data courtesy of Universitat de Barcelona and funded by project CGL 2007-66431-C02-01/BTE.


  1. 1.
    Banerjee S, Mitra S (2004) Remote surface mapping using ortophotos and geologic maps draped over digital elevation models: application to the Sheep Mountain anticline, Wyoming. AAPG Bull 88:1227–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger Z, Williams THL, Anderson DW (1992) Geologic stereo mapping of geologic structures with SPOT satellite data. AAPG Bull 76:101–120Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilotti F, Shaw JH, Brennan PA (2000) Quantitative structural analysis with spectroscopic remote sensing imagery. AAPG Bull 84:727–740Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Kemp EA (1998) Variable 3-D geometrical projection of curvilinear geological features through direction cosine interpolation of structural field observations. Comput Geosci 24:269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Kemp EA (2000) 3-D visualization of structural field data: examples from the Archean Caopatina Formation, Abitibi greenstone belt, Québec, Canada. Comput Geosci 26:509–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dhont D, Luxey P, Chorowicz J (2006) 3-D modeling of geologic maps from surface data. AAPG Bull 89:1465–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fernández O (2004) Reconstruction of geological structures in 3D: an example from the southern Pyrenees. Univeristat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Unpublished PhD thesis. 321Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fernández O, Muñoz JA, Arbués P, Falivene O, Marzo M (2004) 3-D reconstruction of geological surfaces: an example of growth strata and turbidite systems from the Ainsa basin (Pyrenees, Spain). AAPG Bull 88:1049–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fernández O (2005) Obtaining and evaluating strike and dip measurements from 3D georeferenced data. J Struct Geol 27:855–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Groshong Jr RH (1999) 3-D structural geology: a practical guide to surface and subsurface map interpretation. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Husson L, Mugnier JL (2003) Three-dimensional horizon reconstruction from outcrop structural data, restoration, and strain field of the Baishai anticline, Western Nepal. J Struct Geol 25:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maerten L, Pollard DD, Maerten F (2001) Digital mapping of three-dimensional structures of the Chimney Rock fault system, central Utah. J Struct Geol 23:585–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramsay J (1967) Folding and fracturing of rocks. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 560Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woodcock NH (1977) Specification of fabric shapes using an eigenvalue method. GSA Bull 88:1231–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Fernandez
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • S. Jones
    • 1
  • N. Armstrong
    • 1
  • G. Johnson
    • 1
  • A. Ravaglia
    • 1
  • J. A. Muñoz
    • 2
  1. 1.Midland Valley Exp.GlasgowUK
  2. 2.Geomodels, Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Roxar LtdLondonUK

Personalised recommendations