Advertisement

Deformation Characteristics and Electrical Resistivity Response of Soft Coal Under Blast Loading

  • Xiaoyi Mao
  • Yankun MaEmail author
  • Xiangwen Liu
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

A series of experiments of soft coal under different explosive dosages were carried out in this paper. The crack morphology and deformation characteristics of coal were analysed and the regional response characteristics of the internal resistivity of coal obtained. The results indicated that under blast loading, the soft coal presented three types of blasting-induced cracks: radial main crack, circumferential main crack and radial microcrack. The movement deformation of coal led to the change in coal density in different regions. The coal density around the circumferential main crack and the radial microcrack generally decreased, while the coal density around the radial main crack generally increased. The electrical resistivity tomography analysis of soft coal after blasting showed that resistivity increasing and decreasing zones were evident. Coal resistivity under the squeezing of explosion gas decreased, whereas the coal resistivity affected only by explosion stress wave increased. With the increase in explosive dosage, the area of the blasting-induced crack and the volume of blasting cavity both increased first and then decreased. However, under the same explosive dosage, compared with the experiment with the sealing blast hole, the blasting-induced crack area of coal was reduced by 9.69% and the blasting cavity volume was reduced by 70% in the experiment without sealing blast hole, thereby indicating that explosion gas was essential in the movement and deformation of coal in the blasting process of the soft coal.

Keywords

Soft coal Electrical resistivity tomography Explosive dosage Explosion gas Deformation characteristics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC0808000) and Key Research and Development Program of Anhui Province (Grant No. 1704a0802129).

References

  1. Brady BHG, Brown ET (2007) Blasting mechanics. In: Rock mechanics for underground mining. Springer, Netherlands, pp 518–542Google Scholar
  2. Chi LY, Zhang ZX, Aalberg A et al (2019) Fracture processes in granite blocks under blast loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(3):853–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chu HB, Yang XL, Liang WM et al (2018) Study on the damage-fracture process and mechanism of coal blasting. J Min Saf Eng 35(2):410–414Google Scholar
  4. Fu Y, Chen X, Feng ZL (2019) Characteristics of coal-rock fractures based on CT scanning and its influence on failure modes under different confining pressures. J China Coal Soc.  https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2019.0480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gingine V, Dias AS, Cardoso R (2016) Compaction control of clayey soils using electrical resistivity charts. Procedia Eng 143:803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamdi E, Romdhane NB, Le Cléac’h JM (2011) A tensile damage model for rocks: application to blast induced damage assessment. Comput Geotech 38(2):133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hao YF, Li HB, Guo XB et al (2012a) Simulation test on blasting effect of the bedding rock with intercalation. J China Coal Soc 37(3):389–395Google Scholar
  8. Hao YF, Li HB, Guo XB et al (2012b) Study of lamination property and stability caused by blasting in rock slope with weak intercalation. Rock Soil Mech 33(4):1178–1184Google Scholar
  9. He CL, Yang J (2019) Experimental and numerical investigations of dynamic failure process in rock under blast loading. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 83:552–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lak M, Marji MF, Bafghi AY et al (2019) A coupled finite difference-boundary element method for modeling the propagation of explosion-induced radial cracks around a wellbore. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 64:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li SC, Xu XJ, Liu ZY et al (2014) Electrical resistivity and acoustic emission response characteristics and damage evolution of sandstone during whole process of uniaxial compression. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33(1):14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li QW, Li Y, Dasgupta G, et al (2015) Analysis of the blasting compaction on gravel soil. J Chem 2015:1–9Google Scholar
  13. Li HC, Wei LY, Chang CW (2018) Experimental and numerical simulation of explosive compaction in loess. Explos Shock Waves 38(2):289–294Google Scholar
  14. Lian AS, Richard G, Cousin I et al (2004) Three-dimensional crack monitoring by electrical resistivity measurement. Eur J Soil Sci 55:751–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu F, Guo ZR, Lv HY et al (2018) Test and analysis of blast wave in mortar test block. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 108:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu J, Zhang R, Song DZ et al (2019a) Experimental investigation on occurrence of gassy coal extrusion in coalmine. Saf Sci 113:362–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu RF, Zhu ZM, Li M et al (2019b) Study on dynamic fracture behavior of mode I crack under blasting loads. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 117:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loke MH, Chambers JE, Rucker DF et al (2013) Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. J Appl Geophys 95:135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neyamadpour A (2018) Detection of subsurface cracking depth using electrical resistivity tomography: a case study in Masjed-Soleiman, Iran. Constr Build Mater 191:1103–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ning Y, Yang J, Ma G et al (2011) Modelling rock blasting considering explosion gas penetration using discontinuous deformation analysis. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44(4):483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osinowo OO, Falufosi MO (2018) 3D electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) for subsurface evaluation in pre-engineering construction site investigation. NRIAG J Astron Geophys 7(2):309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pan Q, Zhang JC, Guo XB (2011) Principle and experimental study of explosive compaction of soil. Explos Shock Waves 31(2):165–172Google Scholar
  23. Petropoulos N, Wimmer M, Johansson D et al (2018) Compaction of confining materials in pillar blast tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(6):1907–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Song XL, Zhang JC, Guo XB et al (2009) Influence of blasting on the properties of weak intercalation of a layered rock slope. Int J Miner Metall Mater 16(1):0–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song DZ, Liu ZT, Wang EY et al (2015) Evaluation of coal seam hydraulic fracturing using the direct current method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 100(78):230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Takano M, Yamada I, Fukao Y (1993) Anomalous electrical resistivity of almost dry marble and granite under axial compression. J Phys Earth 41(6):337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang EY, Jia HL, Song DZ et al (2014) Use of ultra-low-frequency electromagnetic emission to monitor stress and failure in coal mines. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wei LY, Li HC, Liu YZ (2018) Lateral influence law of explosive compaction of loess embankment with strip charge. Explos Shock Waves 38(1):233–240Google Scholar
  29. Yang XL, Wang MS (2001) Mechanism of rock crack propagation under the action of explosive gas. Explos Shock Waves 21(2):111–116Google Scholar
  30. Yang RS, Ding CX, Wang YB et al (2016) Action-effect study of medium under loading of explosion stress wave and explosion gas. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 35(S2):3501–3506Google Scholar
  31. Yang RS, Ding CX, Yang LY et al (2018) Visualizing the blast-induced stress wave and blasting gas action effects using digital image correlation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 112:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yuan W, Su XB, Wang W et al (2019) Numerical study of the contributions of shock wave and detonation gas to crack generation in deep rock without free surfaces. J Pet Sci Eng 177:699–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang Q (1990) Crushing zone and cavity expansion of rock blasting. Explos Shock Waves 10(1):68–75Google Scholar
  34. Zhang ZX (2016) Rock fracture and blasting: theory and applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao RX, Lu SF, Xue HT et al (2019) Effect of SEM parameters on quantitative evaluation of shale micropores. Oil Gas Geol 40(5):1141–1154Google Scholar
  36. Zhu ZM, Mohanty B, Xie HP (2007) Numerical investigation of blasting-induced crack initiation and propagation in rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(3):412–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu WC, Wei CH, Li S et al (2013) Numerical modeling on destress blasting in coal seam for enhancing gas drainage. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 59:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal MinesHuainanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Energy and Safety EngineeringAnhui University of Science and TechnologyHuainanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Xuzhou XCMG Schwing Machinery Co., LtdXuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations