Advertisement

Development Status and Prospects of Mine Physical Similar Material Simulation Experiments

  • Wen-bin SunEmail author
  • Fei Zhou
  • Jian-li Shao
  • Hou-qian Du
  • Yan-chao Xue
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

The development situation of mine physical simulation test is summarized from four aspects: similarity theory of physical simulation test, test means, material selection and monitoring means, which was summarized according to the available data. Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of various loading methods, as well as the application of various experimental equipment, it is believed that experimental equipment should be developed to maximization. Summarizing similar materials from two aspects, we believe that similar materials will develop towards visualization and transparency; the monitoring means are divided into internal testing equipment and external monitoring equipment, and the testing means should be diversified. And small size, light weight, wireless transmission sensor is the development direction of future monitoring sensors.

Keywords

Similar materials Physical simulation Simulation methods Monitoring systems 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51404146), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2015M572067), Postdoctoral Innovation Project of Shandong Province (Grant No. 152799), Qingdao Postdoctoral Applied Research Project (Grant No. 2015203), AnHui Province Key Laboratory of modern mining engineering Foundation (Grant No. KLMME12101),The Young Teachers’ Growth Program of Shandong Province.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chai J, Zhao WH, Li Y et al (2013) FBG monitoring test on settlement deformation of overlayingstrata in similar models. J China Coal Soc 29(01):55–60Google Scholar
  2. Chai J, Zhang L, Cao JQ et al (2014) Similar material model experiment of stress detection by fiber Bragg grating sensor. J Xi’an Univ Sci Technol 34(06):656–663Google Scholar
  3. Chang TY, Li DS, Sui QM et al (2008) Experiment research of fiber grating sensor in the forked tunnel model. Chin J Sci Instrum 01:103–108Google Scholar
  4. Chen AM, Gu JC, Shen J et al (2004) Application study on the geomechanical model experiment techniques. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23(22):3785–3789Google Scholar
  5. Chen ZQ, Zhang YX, Zhou JY (2012) Experimental study on infrared photographs of deformation and failure of surrounding rock of tunnels procession induced by excavation. Chin J Geotech Eng 34(07):1271–1277Google Scholar
  6. Chen YJ, Zhang J, Zhou AC, Yin B (2018) A modeling method for a disaster chain-taking the coal mining subsidence chain as an example. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 24(5):1388–1408Google Scholar
  7. Cui XM, Xu JL, Miu XX et al (1999) Modeling experiment for the rock movement in fullymechanized sub-level caving and slice mining at Lu’an coal field. J Exp Mech 14(03):402–406Google Scholar
  8. Cui XM, Miu XX, Su DG et al (2002) Error analysis in similar material simulation test of the movement of rock strata and surface. J Rock Mech Eng 21(12):1827–1830Google Scholar
  9. Deng QF, Luan YX, Wang YA (1989) Coal and gas outburst simulation test. Coal Mine Saf 11:5–10Google Scholar
  10. Duzgun HS, Leveson N (2018) Analysis of soma mine disaster using causal analysis based on systems theory (CAST). Saf Sci 110:37–57Google Scholar
  11. Feng XD, Li SZ, Li SC et al (2010) The development of fiber optic Bragg grating sensors and their applications to the mine water-inrush model test. J China Coal Soc 35(02):283–287Google Scholar
  12. Feng D, Xu J, Tao YQ et al (2017) Physical simulation test of hydraulic borehole flushing. J Min Saf Eng 34(4):78–782Google Scholar
  13. He MC, Ren FQ, Gong WL et al (2017) Temperature characteristics during physical simulation test of strain burs. J China Univ Min Technol 46(4):692–698Google Scholar
  14. Hou ZJ, Zhang J (2004) The solid–liquid coupling two-qhase experiment and analysis of the protection of potentiona water in northern mining area of Shaanxi. J Hunan Univ Sci Technol 19(04):1–5Google Scholar
  15. Li HC (1988) Similar simulation test of mine pressure. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou, pp 5–25Google Scholar
  16. Li LJ, Qian MG, Yin YQ (1997) Research on the tests of water-inrush from floor simulated by similar materials. Coal Geol Explor 01:35–38Google Scholar
  17. Li SC, Zhou Y, Li LP et al (2012) Development and application of a new similar material for underground engineering fluid–solid coupling model test. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(06):1128–1137Google Scholar
  18. Li MJ, Qi WY, Tai Y (2016) Analogous simulation experiment study on the movement rule of overlying strata in solid backfill for coal mining. Mining R&D 36(01):72–75Google Scholar
  19. Li XL, Li ZH, Wang EY et al (2017) Microseismic signal spectra, energy characteristics, and fractal features prior to rock burst: a case study from the Qianqiu coal mine, China. J Earthq Eng 21(6):891–911Google Scholar
  20. Lin YM (1984) Experimental rock mechanics-simulation research. China Coal Industry Publishing House, Beijing, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  21. Lu D (1993) Hydraulic transmission principle and hydraulic transmission engineering. Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Harbin, pp 20–29Google Scholar
  22. Ma J, Liu LQ, Liu PX et al (2007) Thermal precursory pattern of fault unstable sliding: an experimental study of en echelon faults. Chin J Geophys 50(04):1141–1149Google Scholar
  23. Meng B, Jing HW, Yang XX et al (2013) Exprimental study of deformation and failure characteristics of anchorage unit in fractured surrounding rocks. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 32(12):2497–2505Google Scholar
  24. Peng YM (1990) Engineering geological physical simulation test. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 02:25–29Google Scholar
  25. Peng JB, Chen LW, Huang QB et al (2008) Large-scale physical simulative experiment onground-fissure expansion mechanism. Chin J Geophys 51(06):1826–1834Google Scholar
  26. Ragini JR, Anand PMR, Bhaskar V (2018) Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis. Int J Inf Manag 42:13–24Google Scholar
  27. Schoenberger E (2016) Environmentally sustainable mining: the case of tailings storage facilities. Resour Policy 49:119–128Google Scholar
  28. Shan JZ (1996) Application of structural simulation experiments in petroleum geology. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, pp 6–17Google Scholar
  29. Strozik G, Jendrus R, Manowska A, Popczyk M (2016) Mine subsidence as a post-mining effect in the Upper Silesia Coal Basin. Pol J Environ Stud. 25(2):777–785Google Scholar
  30. Sun WB, Zhang SC (2015) Development of floor water invasion of mining influence simulation testing system and its application. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 34(S1):3274–3280Google Scholar
  31. Tang YB, Yuan L, Xue JH et al (2017) Control factors of coal and gas outburst and energy evolution based on physical simulation. Saf Coal Min 48(11):1-4–1-8Google Scholar
  32. Wang J, Zhu DY, Gong WL et al (2018) Physical simulation experiment on the movement of rock strata upon automatic roadway forming by roof cutting and pressure releasing. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 37(11):2536–2547Google Scholar
  33. Yan WT, Dai HY, Chen JJ (2018) Surface crack and sand inrush disaster induced by high-strength mining: example from the Shendong coal field, China. Geosci J 22(2):347–357Google Scholar
  34. Yin ZQ, Li XB, Yin TB et al (2012) Critical failure characteristics of high stress rock induced by impact disturbance under confining pressure unloading. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(07):1355–1362Google Scholar
  35. Zhang ST (2015) Study on similarity of materials and systems for coal and gas outburst simulation. Anhui Univ Sci and Technol, Anhui, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  36. Zhang J, Hou ZJ (2004) Experimental study on simulation materials for solid–liquid coupling. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23(18):3157–3161Google Scholar
  37. Zhang JC, Liu TQ (1990) On depth of fissured zone in seam floor resulted from coal extraction and its distribution characteristics. J China Coal Soc 02:46–55Google Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Wang JP (2014) Similar simulation and practical research on the mining overburden roof strata “three-zones” height. J Min Saf Eng 31(02):249–254Google Scholar
  39. Zhang SC, Guo WJ, Li YY (2017) Experimental simulation of water-inrush disaster from the floor of mine and its mechanism investigation. Arab J Geosci 10(22):503Google Scholar
  40. Zhao YS, Wan ZJ, Zhang Y et al (2008) Research and development of 20 mn servo-controlled rock triaxial testing system with high temperature and high pressure. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25(01):1–8Google Scholar
  41. Zhou H, Meng FZ, Zhang CQ et al (2015a) Review and status of research on physical simulation test for rockburst. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 34(05):915–923Google Scholar
  42. Zhou H, Xu RC, Lu JJ et al (2015b) Study on mechanisms and physical simulation experiment of slab buckling rockburst in deep tunnel. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 34(S2):3658–3666Google Scholar
  43. 氏平 増, 礒部 俊, 樋口 澄 (1984) 内部ガス圧による多孔質材料の破壊について–ガス突出に関する研究. J Min Metall Inst Jpn 100(1153): 225–232Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen-bin Sun
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Fei Zhou
    • 1
  • Jian-li Shao
    • 1
  • Hou-qian Du
    • 1
  • Yan-chao Xue
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Mining and Safety EngineeringShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Modern Mining EngineeringAnhui University of Science and TechnologyHuainanChina

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options