Advertisement

Petrophysical Properties of Opalinus Clay Drill Cores Determined from Med-XCT Images

  • Lukas M. KellerEmail author
  • Silvio B. Giger
Technical Note
  • 132 Downloads

Abstract

The determination of petrophysical properties such as density, porosity and mineralogical composition of the rock are key objectives in cored sections of drilling campaigns. In view of the large amount of sample material that accumulates during a drilling campaign, a seamless determination of the properties along the cores is not feasible if only direct methods are used. Therefore, fast, non-destructive and affordable methods have been developed. Three-dimensional images of Opalinus Clay drill cores were acquired by using a medical X-ray computed tomographic scanner (med-XCT). The CT numbers of the images were density calibrated, which allowed to determine bulk density variations along drill cores. Then, a relationship between rock composition and bulk density was built in form of linear regression models to predict the porosity or the contents of major components from density calibrated image data. This relationship was established on the basis of rock samples, of which mineralogical compositions and porosities were measured in the laboratory. It turned out that the bulk density of Opalinus Clay is systematically related to porosity and the contents of clay minerals, quartz and calcite. With increasing density, porosity and clay minerals content decrease. This is because the pores and clay minerals together form the porous clay matrix and are thus structurally connected. The density of the porous clay matrix is comparatively low, and its content therefore controls the bulk density of Opalinus Clay. With a decrease in the content of the porous clay matrix, the calcite and quartz contents both increase, which is associated with an increase in bulk density. No systematic behavior was found for the accessories. Thus, their influence on bulk density is considered to be small. Med-XCT in combination with reference samples allows the determination of the rock composition and porosity along drill cores. In the case of Opalinus Clay, a larger number of reference samples (> ~50) are required to predict the properties with confidence.

Keywords

Medical X-ray tomography Shale density Shale composition Opalinus Clay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Bulk rock mineralogy and bulk wet density data was provided by University of Bern. The authors acknowledge fruitful discussions and exchanges with Prof. M. Mazurek.

References

  1. Ashi J (1995) CT scan analysis of sediments from Leg 146. In: Carson B, Westbrook GK, Musgrave RJ, Suess E (eds) Proceedings of the ocean drilling program, scientific results, vol 146 (Pt. 1), pp 191–199Google Scholar
  2. Ashi J (1997) Computed tomography scan image analysis of sediments. In: Shipley TH, Ogawa Y, Blum P, Bahr JM (eds) Proceedings of the ocean drilling program, scientific results, vol 156, pp 151–159Google Scholar
  3. Bossart P, Thury M (2008) Mont Terri Rock Laboratory: project, programme 1996–2007 and results. Reports of the Swiss Geological Survey, No. 3Google Scholar
  4. Brabant L, Pauwels E, Dierick M, Van Loo D, Boone MA, Van Hoorebeke L (2012) A novel beam hardening correction method requiring no prior knowledge, incorporated in an iterative reconstruction algorithm. NDT&E Int 51:68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Ridder M, Van den Bulcke J, Vansteenkiste D, Van Loo D, Dierick M, Masschaele B, De Witte Y, Mannes D, Lehmann E, Beeckman H, Van Hoorebeke L, Van Acker J (2011) High-resolution proxies for wood density variations in Terminalia superba. Ann Bot 107:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giger SB, Ewy RT, Favero V, Stankovic R, Keller LM (2018) Consolidated-undrained triaxial testing of Opalinus Clay: results and method validation. Geomech Energy Environ 14:16–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta LP, Tanikawa W, Hamada Y, Hirose T, Ahagon N, Sigihara T, Abe N, Nomura Y, Wu HY, Lin W, Kinoshita M, Yamada Y, Expedition NGHP, 02 JAMSTEC Science Team (2018) Examination of gas hydrate-bearing deep ocean sediments by X-ray computed tomography and verification of physical property measurements of sediments. Mar Pet Geol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.05.033 Google Scholar
  8. Jovanovic Z, Khan F, Enzmann F, Kersten M (2013) Simultaneous segmentation and beam-hardening correction in computed microtomography of rock cores. Comput Geosci 56:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keller LM, Schuetz P, Gasser P, Holzer L (2013) Pore-space relevant for gas-permeability in Opalinus Clay: statistical analysis of homogeneity, percolation and representative volume element. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 118:2799–2812.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khan F, Enzmann F, Kersten M (2016) Multi-phase classification by least-squares support vector machine approach in tomography images of geological samples. Solid Earth 7:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mazurek M, Waber HN, Maeder UK, Gimmi T, de Haller A, Koroleva M (2012) Geochemical synthesis for the Effinger member in Boreholes at Oftringen, Goesgen and Kuettigen, Nagra technical report NTB 12-07. Nagra Weinfelden, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Mees F, Swennen R, Van Geet M, Jacobs P (2003) Applications of X-ray computed tomography in the geosciences. Geological Society, London, vol 215. Special Publications, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  13. Nagra (2002) Projekt Opalinuston—Synthese der geowissenschafftlichen Untersuchungsergebnisse. Entsorgungsnachweis für abgebrannte Brennelemente, verglaste hochaktive sowie langlebige mittelaktive Abfälle. Nagra technical report NTB 02-03, Nagra Weinfelden, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  14. Revil A, Cathles LM (1999) Permeability of shaly sands. Water Resour Res 35:651–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schlüter S, Sheppard A, Brown K, Wildenschild D (2014) Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: a review. Water Resour Res 50:3615–3639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Taud H, Martinez-Angeles R, Parrot JF, Hernandez-Escobedo L (2005) Porosity estimation method by X-ray computed tomography. J Pet Sci Eng 47:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wallis WA (1951) Tolerance intervals for linear regression. In: Neyman J (ed) Second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp 43–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ZHAW, University of Applied SciencesWinterthur, ZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive WasteWettingenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations