Advertisement

Assessment of the Geotechnical Behavior of Collapsible Soils: A Case Study of the Mohammad-Abad Railway Station Soil in Semnan

  • Mohsen ZamaniEmail author
  • Kazem Badv
Original Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Collapsible soils are a type of problematic soils which are found in many regions of Iran. These soils show sudden and irreversible reduction in volume with applied stress at constant moisture content or with increase in moisture content at a constant stress level or changes in both. The purpose of this research was to assess the geotechnical properties of loess soil around Mohammad-Abad of Semnan railway station and determine its collapsibility potential. Remolded soil samples were tested for their collapsibility using oedometer tests. In addition, the application of Cement Kiln Dust (CKD) to reduce collapsibility of two types of soils collected from this region was studied. The results indicate that the types of aggregation, clay content, salt, and porosity had a significant impact on the collapse phenomenon of the tested soils. The addition of CKD to both soils types resulted in more than 50% reduction in the collapsibility potential.

Keywords

Collapsible soils Loess soils Geotechnical assessment Soil improvement Cement kiln dust (CKD) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge Urmia University for supporting this research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abelev YM (1948) The essentials of designing and building on macroporous soils. Stroivoenmorizdat, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. Adaska WS, Taubert DH (2008) Beneficial uses of cement kiln dust. In: 2008 IEEE cement industry technical conference record, Miami, FL, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/citcon.2008.24
  3. Albusoda BS, Salem LA (2012) Stabilization of dune sand by using cement kiln dust (CKD). J Earth Sci Geotech Eng 2(1):131–143Google Scholar
  4. Ali MM (2011) Identifying and analyzing problematic soils. Geotech Geol Eng 29(3):343–350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9380-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Refeai TO, Al-Karni AA (1999) Experimental study on the utilization of cement kiln dust for ground modification. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 11(2):217–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30999-1 Google Scholar
  6. Al-Shammary AAG, Kouzani AZ, Kaynak A, Khoo SY, Norton M, Gates W (2018) Soil bulk density estimation methods: a review. Pedosphere 28(4):581–596.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(18)60034-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM C117-13 (2013) Standard test method for materials finer than 75-μm (no. 200) sieve in mineral aggregates by washing. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  8. ASTM C136 / C136 M-14 (2014) Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  9. ASTM D2216-10 (2010) Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  10. ASTM D2487-17 (2017) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  11. ASTM D4318-17 (2017) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  12. ASTM D4546-14e1 (2014) Standard test methods for one-dimensional swell or collapse of soils. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  13. ASTM D4972 - 01 (2001) Standard test method for ph of soils. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  14. ASTM D5333-03 (2003) Standard test method for measurement of collapse potential of soils. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  15. ASTM D698-12 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  16. ASTM D7928-17 (2017) Standard test method for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  17. ASTM D854-14 (2014) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  18. Baghdadi ZA, Fatani MN, Sabban NA (1995) Soil modification by cement kiln dust. J Mater Civ Eng 7(4):218–222.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(1995)7:4(218) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Barden L, Mcgown A, Collins K (1973) The collapse mechanism in partly saturated soil. Eng Geol 7(1):49–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(73)90006-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlson K, Sariosseiri F, Muhunthan B (2011) Engineering properties of cement kiln dust-modified soils in Western Washington State. Geotech Geol Eng 29(5):837–844.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9420-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Derbyshire E, Meng X, Wang J, Zhou Z, Li B (1995) Collapsible loess on the loess plateau of China. In: Derbyshire E, Dijkstra T, Smalley IJ (eds) Genesis and properties of collapsible soils, NATO ASI series (series C: mathematical and physical sciences), vol 468. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 267–293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0097-7_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dobrescu CF, Calarasu EA, Craifaleanu IG (2017) Ground settlement in urban structures exposed to geo-environmental and anthropic hazards: a case study for Galati. Proc Eng 190:611–618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. El Howayek A, Huang PT, Bisnett R, Santagata MC (2011) Identification and behavior of collapsible soils. Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2011/12, Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.  https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314625
  24. Evstatiev D (1988) Loess improvement methods. Eng Geol 25(2–4):341–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(88)90036-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feda J (1966) Structural stability of subsident loess soil from Praha-Dejvice. Eng Geol 1(3):201–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(66)90032-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaaver KE (2012) Geotechnical properties of Egyptian collapsible soils. Alex Eng J 51(3):205–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haeri SM, Zamani A, Garakani AA (2012) Collapse potential and permeability of undisturbed and remolded loessial soil samples. In: Mancuso C, Jommi C, D’Onza F (eds) Unsaturated soils: research and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 301–308.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31116-1_41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Handy RL (1973) Collapsible loess in Iowa. Soil Sci Soc Am J 37(2):281.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700020033x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holtz WG, Hilf JW (1961) Settlement of soil foundations due to saturation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Paris, vol 1, pp 673–679Google Scholar
  30. Houston SL, Houston WN, Spadola DJ (1988) Prediction of field collapse of soils due to wetting. J Geotech Eng 114(1):40–58.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1988)114:1(40) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Houston SL, Houston WN, Zapata CE, Lawrence C (2001) Geotechnical engineering practice for collapsible soils. In: Toll DG (ed) Unsaturated soil concepts and their application in geotechnical practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 333–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9775-3_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ismail AIM, Belal ZL (2016) Use of cement kiln dust on the engineering modification of soil materials, Nile Delta, Egypt. Geotech Geol Eng 34(2):463–469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9957-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jefferson I, Rogers C, Evststiev D, Karastanev D (2015) Improvement of collapsible loess in Eastern Europe. In: Indraratna B, Chu J, Rujikiatkamjorn C (eds) Ground improvement case histories: compaction, grouting and geosynthetics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 215–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100698-6.00007-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jennings JE, Knight K (1975) A guide to construction on or with materials exhibiting additional settlement due to collapse of grain structure. In: Proceedings of the 6th regional conference for Africa on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Durban, South Africa, pp 99–105Google Scholar
  35. Li P, Vanapalli S, Li T (2016) Review of collapse triggering mechanism of collapsible soils due to wetting. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(2):256–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lutenegger AJ, Hallberg GR (1988) Stability of loess. Eng Geol 25(2–4):247–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(88)90030-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maslehuddin M, Al-Amoudi OSB, Rahman MK, Ali MR, Barry MS (2009) Properties of cement kiln dust concrete. Constr Build Mater 23(6):2357–2361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller GA, Azad S (2000) Influence of soil type on stabilization with cement kiln dust. Constr Build Mater 14(2):89–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00007-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller GA, Zaman M (2000) Field and laboratory evaluation of cement kiln dust as a soil stabilizer. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1714:25–32.  https://doi.org/10.3141/1714-04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Noorzad R, Pakniat H (2016) Investigating the effect of sample disturbance, compaction and stabilization on the collapse index of soils. Environ Earth Sci 75:1263.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6073-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nouaouria MS, Guenfoud M, Lafifi B (2008) Engineering properties of loess in Algeria. Eng Geol 99(1–2):85–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parsons RL, Kneebone E (2004) Use of cement kiln dust for the stabilization of soils. Geotech Eng Transp Proj 1:2.  https://doi.org/10.1061/40744(154)101 Google Scholar
  43. Punmia BC, Jain AK, Jain AK (2005) Soil mechanics and foundations, 16th edn. Laxmi Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  44. Rezaei M, Ajalloeian R, Ghafoori M (2012) Geotechnical properties of problematic soils emphasis on collapsible cases. Int J Geosci 03(01):105–110.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2012.31012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rhoades JD, Chanduvi F, Lesch S (1999) Soil salinity assessment: methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper No. 57. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  46. Rogers CDF (1995) Types and distribution of collapsible soils. In: Derbyshire E, Dijkstra T, Smalley IJ (eds) Genesis and properties of collapsible soils, NATO ASI series (series C: mathematical and physical sciences), vol 468. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0097-7_1 Google Scholar
  47. Rogers CDF, Dijkstra TA, Smalley IJ (1994) Hydroconsolidation and subsidence of loess: studies from China, Russia, North America and Europe. Eng Geol 37(2):83–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(94)90045-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sabbagh AO (1982) Collapsing soil and their clay mineralogy in Tucson. Dissertation, University of ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  49. Sariosseiri F, Muhunthan B (2008) Geotechnical properties of Palouse loess modified with cement kiln dust and portland cement. GeoCongress 2008, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States.  https://doi.org/10.1061/40972(311)12
  50. Ziaie Moayed R, Kamalzare M (2015) Improving physical characteristics of collapsible soil (case study: Tehran-Semnan railroad). J Eng Geol 9(2):2869–2890.  https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jeg.9.2.2869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations