Advertisement

Analogically Physical Simulation of Coalbed–Caprock Deformation in Geological Storage of CO2

  • Siqing Lan
  • Nengzhong Lei
  • Weiqun LiuEmail author
  • Tian Fang
  • Yang Hu
Original Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

CO2-enhanced coalbed methane (CO2-ECBM) can not only reduce greenhouse gas by geological storage of CO2 remarkablely, but also increase the recovery efficiency of Clean Coalbed gas. Therefore, it is regarded as a hot global topic, and is a significant approach to realizing the strategy of environment and energy of China. To better utilize coalbeds as the storage space, and to avoid the leakage of CO2 from the sealing site, coalbed and caprock in the pore-pressure limitation must be learnt, infiltrating ability and deforming modulus, etc. Because of the difficulty of underground exploration and inaccuracy of physical simulation, the numerical analysis so far is the main research technique. This paper employed sealing rods as the experimental materials according to their water swelling property, and built the swelling analogy relationship between water-injecting rod and gas-injecting coal. Furthermore, a similarly physical simulation was designed to measure the deformation and stress of coalbed–caprock system so as to provide the testing data for CO2-ECBM engineering. The results show that, based on the quantities analogy of water-swelling materials, all the data measured for the similar coalbed–caprock system are reasonable. In the caprock, a farther location from the injection well contributes a smaller deformation, and the deformation is the negative exponential function of the distance. In our experiment, coalbed strain can reach 10−4 in order of magnitudes, and therefore in the process of gas injection, the magnitude of stress change in the caprock can reach MPa. Finally, gradually upgrading the injecting pressure is a rational technology in the CO2-ECBM engineering.

Keywords

Coalbed storage of CO2 Water-swelling materials Analogically physical simulation Rational gas-injecting mode 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We particularly thank Dr. Li Zhu and Mr. Yan Dong for the assistance in experiments. Supported by ‘‘973 Program’’ of China 2015CB251602 and Jiangsu NSF BK20141124.

References

  1. Connell LD, Detournay C (2009) Coupled flow and geomechanical processes during enhanced coal seam methane recovery through CO2 sequestration. Int J Coal Geol 77(1–2):222–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Durucan S, Shi JQ (2009) Improving the CO2 well injectivity and enhanced coalbed methane production performance in coal seams. Int J Coal Geol 77(1):214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ebigbo A, Class H, Helmig R (2007) CO2 leakage through an abandoned well: problem-oriented benchmarks. Comput Geosci 11(2):103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Faiz MM, Saghafi A, Barclay SA et al (2007) Evaluating geological sequestration of CO2 in bituminous coals. Int J Greenh Gas Control 1(2):223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng QY, Zhou L, Chen ZW et al (2009) Numerical simulation of coupled binary gas–solid interaction during carbon dioxide sequestration in a coal bed. Geol J China Univ 15(1):63–68Google Scholar
  6. Hamelinck CN, Faaji APC, Turkenburg WC et al (2002) CO2 enhanced coalbed methane production in the Netherlands. Energy 27(7):647–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Larsen JW (2004) The effects of dissolved CO2 on coal structure and properties. Int J Coal Geol 57(1):63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore TA (2012) Coalbed methane: a review. Int J Coal Geol 101(6):36–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shi J, Durucan S (2005) CO2 storage in deep unminable coal seams. Oil Gas Sci Technol 60(3):547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Bergen F, Winthaegen P, Pagnier H et al (2009) Assessment of CO2 storage performance of the enhanced coalbed methane pilot site in Kaniow. Energy Proc 1(1):3407–3414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. White CM, Smith DH, Jones KL et al (2005) Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery a review. Energy Fuels 19(3):659–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wong S, Law D, Deng X et al (2007) Enhanced coalbed methane and CO2 storage in anthracitic coals—micro-pilot test at south Qinshui, Shanxi, China. Int J Greenh Gas Control 1(2):215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wu SY, Zhao W, Guo YY (2005) Parametric correlation between expansion deformation of coal mass and adsorption thermodynamics. J Northeast Univ: Nat Sci 26(7):683–686Google Scholar
  14. Zhou JP, Xian XF, Jiang YD et al (2011) Numerical simulation of carbon dioxide storage in unmineable coalbe. J Chongqing Univ 34(7):83–90Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siqing Lan
    • 1
  • Nengzhong Lei
    • 1
  • Weiqun Liu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tian Fang
    • 2
  • Yang Hu
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Architecture and Civil EngineeringWuyi UniversityWuyishanChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanics and Civil EngineeringChina University of Mining and TechnologyXuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations