Advertisement

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 2003–2020 | Cite as

Geotechnical Mapping of Najran Soils for Safe Urban Expansion, Najran Region, Saudi Arabia

  • Ahmed Abd El Aal
  • Alaa A. Masoud
Original paper
  • 255 Downloads

Abstract

One hundred eighty-three rotary-drilled boreholes from fifteen districts in Najran area, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, were sampled and tested in the field and in laboratory to analyze the spatial variation in their geotechnical properties. Number of samples varied with the performed test including grain size distribution (668), Atterberg limits (24), moisture content (432), free swelling (49), direct shear strength (51), unconfined compression strength (37), and soil water chemistry of 168 samples were analyzed for Cl, SO 3 −2 , and CO3), and 120 samples for pH. Descriptive statistics were appraised for clarifying the geotechnical variations among the districts and various AASHTO-classified soil types. GIS-based geostatistical kriging with minimum error achieved was used for preparing the spatial maps of the geotechnical parameters. Results showed that majority of soil samples were non-plastic. Hubuna district showed the larger LL (42%), PL (25%), and PI (20%) while Mefraq Al-Khamis recorded the lowest values of LL (23%), PL (19%), and PI (2%). Atterberg limits showed a northwestward increase to reach its maxima at Thar. Moisture content was larget in Khobash and showed local highs at Najran Al-Fahd and Al-Mashaliya.Fine sands prevailed north and east of Abu Shadad with local highs in Al-Mashaliya and Najran University. Silt and clay soils dominate in Najran Al-Fahd district. Local highs of free swelling were vivid at Abu Shadad, Khobash, Mefraq Al-Khamis, and Najran Al-Fahd districts. UCS showed largest in Najran University. Shear test friction angle showed lowest at Khobash and Abu Shadad districts dominated by coarse to medium sands and gravels and largest of 35° in Najran University and extends to Thar attaining the largest fine sand and gravel contents. Largest Cl and SO 3 −2 contents characterized the districts of Thar, Al-Hosayniya and Hubuna while CO3 showed local high at Najran Al-Fahd district, the soils were acidic with pH lower than 5.5. Three main soil types according to AASHTO classification formed about 91% of the samples: A-1-b (56%), A-2-4 (23.5%), and A-3 (11.4%), were mapped and their geotechnical properties were characterized. Results can help efficient decision-making process to set proper management zones and prevent geotechnical risks where measures in the design and construction stages can be decided for future expansions and subsurface tunneling based on the district- and soil type-specific.

Keywords

Geotechnical database Geostatistical modeling GIS Najran KSA 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly acknowledge the efforts of Eng. Khurram Masood, the geotechnical engineer in Al Jazzar Constant Engineer for providing Data. Thanks also go to Prof. Dr. Alaa Mustafa Professor of sedimentary rocks, Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University (Assiut Branch), for his critical review of the original manuscript and constructive suggestions for upgrading the clarity of the manuscript. The authors are also greatly indebted to the editor and the reviewers for their valuable time and the comments they raised that have improved the rigor of the work.

References

  1. Al-Shanti AM (1993) Geology of the Arabian shield. King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, p 196Google Scholar
  2. American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318 (2008) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08) and commentary (ACI 318R-08). ACI, Farmington HillsGoogle Scholar
  3. American Society for Testing and Materials “ASTM” (2005) American Society for testing and materials annual book of ASTM standards, volume 04.08, soil and rock (I): D 420–D 5611 and volume 04.09, soil and rock (II):D 5714-latest. West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM D2166/D2166M-16 (2016) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil, ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM D3080/D3080M-11 (2011) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions, ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM D 516—The standard test method for sulfate and carbonate contents were determined by calorimeter method. American Society for testing and materials annual book of ASTM standards, volume 04.08, soil and rock (I): D 420–D 5611 and volume 04.09, soil and rock (II): D 5714-latest. West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM D512—The Standard test method for chloride content was determined by silver nitrate method. American Society for testing and materials annual book of ASTM standards, volume 04.08, soil and rock (I): D 420–D 5611 and volume 04.09, soil and rock (II): D 5714-latest. West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell FG, Jermy CA (1994) Building on clay soils which undergo volume changes. Archit Sci Rev 37:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bell FG, Maud RR (1995) Expansive clays and construction, especially of low-rise structures: a viewpoint from Natal, South Africa. Environ Eng Geosci 1:41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron DA (2006) The role of vegetation in stabilizing highly plastic clay subgrades. In: Ghataora GS, Burrow MPN (eds) Proceedings of railway foundations, RailFound 06, Birmingham, Sept., pp 165–186Google Scholar
  11. Chen T, Liu X, Zhu M, Zhao K, Wu J, Xu J, Huang P (2008) Identification of trace element sources and associated risk assessment in vegetable soils of the urban–rural transitional area of Hangzhou, China. Environ Pollut 151:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clayton CRI, Xu M, Whiter JT, Ham A, Rust M (2010) Stresses in cast-iron pipes due to seasonal shrink-swell of clay soils. Proc Inst Civil Eng Water Manag 163(WM3):157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Rienzo F, Oreste P, Pelizza S (2008) Subsurface geological–geotechnical modelling to sustain underground civil planning. Eng Geol 96:187–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhowian A, Ruwiah I, Erol A (1985) The distribution and evaluation of expansive soils in Saudi Arabia. In: Proceedings of the Second Saudi Engineering conference, vol. 4. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, pp 1969–1990Google Scholar
  15. El May M, Dlala M, Chenini I (2010) Urban geological mapping: geotechnical data analysis for rational development planning. Eng Geol 116(2010):129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (1998) Evapotranspiración del cultivo. Guíaspara la determinación de los requerimientos de agua de los cultivos. Estudio FAO riego y drenaje 5. Report, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of theUnited Nation, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  17. Goh ATC, Goh SH (2007) Support vector machines: their use in geotechnical engineering as illustrated using seismic liquefaction data. Comput Geotech 34:410–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hack R, Orlic B, Ozmutlu S, Zhu S, Rengers N (2006) Three and more dimensional modelling in geoengineering. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamada M (1969) Neutralization (carbonation) of concrete and corrosion of reinforcing steel. In: Proceedings of 5th international symposium on chemistry of cement, Tokyo, pp 343–369Google Scholar
  20. Hyndman R, Hyndman D (2009) Natural hazards and disasters. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. Masoud AA (2015) Geotechnical evaluation of the alluvial soils for urban land management zonation in Gharbiya governorate, Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 101:360–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Masoud AA (2016) Geotechnical site suitability mapping for urban land management in Tanta district, Egypt. Arab J Geosci 9:340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGrath D, Zhang C, Carton OT (2004) Geostatistical analyses and hazard assessment on soil lead in Silver mines area, Ireland. Environ Pollut 127:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moral FJ, Terrón JM, Marques da Silva JR (2010) Delineation of management zones using mobile measurements of soil apparent electrical conductivity and multivariate geostatistical techniques. Soil Tillage Res 106:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nagataki S, Ohga H, Kim EM (1986) Effect of curing conditions on the carbonation of concrete with fly ash and the corrosion of reinforcement in long-term tests. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on the use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, ACI SP-91, Detroit, pp 521–539Google Scholar
  26. Papadimitriou AG, Antoniou AA, Bouckovalas GD, Marinos PG (2007) Methodology for automated GIS-aided seismic microzonation studies. Comput Geotech 35:505–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parsons RL, Frost JD (2002) Evaluating site investigation quality using GIS and geostatistics. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(6):451–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson MG (1988) Carbonation of reinforced concrete. Citis Ltd., DublinGoogle Scholar
  29. Sable EG (1985) Explanation notes on the geologic map of the Najran quadrangle Sheet 17G, Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaGoogle Scholar
  30. SBC (2007) Saudi Building Code National Committee (SBC-304), 1st edGoogle Scholar
  31. Stavridakis EI (2006) Assessment of anisotropic behaviour of swelling soils on ground and construction work. In: Al-Rawas AA, Goosen MFA (eds) Expansive soils: recent advances in characterization and treatment. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Tilford NR (1994) Site selection: past and present. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 31(157):169Google Scholar
  33. Tuutti K (1982) Corrosion of Steel in Concrete. CBI forskning research, Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  34. Youssef AM, Sabtan AA, Maerz NH, Zabramawi YA (2013) Earth Fissures in Wadi Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Hazards, Nat.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0991-5 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geology Department, Faculty of ScienceAl Azhar University, (Assiut Branch)AssiutEgypt
  2. 2.Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringNajran UniversityNajranSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Geology Department, Faculty of ScienceTanta UniversityTantaEgypt

Personalised recommendations