Advertisement

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1349–1357 | Cite as

A Study on Tensiometer Measurements in Salt Laden Soil Used for Irrigation Scheduling

  • D. Abhijit
  • C. Malaya
  • S. Sreedeep
Original paper

Abstract

Tensiometer is one of the most popular and simple instrument for in situ and laboratory measurement of negative pressure or suction in soils. Such measurements in the top soil or root zone are useful for automated optimized irrigation scheduling for different vegetation. The top soil accommodates various salts/contaminants whose main source is storm water runoff, irrigation water and application of crop fertilizers. These salts accumulate in the soil due to evaporation. It is an established fact that tensiometer measures only soil matric suction with the help of a ceramic interface. It is believed that osmotic effect of salts present in the soil does not influence tensiometer measurements. However, there is no systematic experimental verification in the literature to understand the influence of salt laden soil on tensiometer measurements. It needs to be ascertained that the pore size of the tensiometer ceramic will not exhibit semi-permeable membrane characteristics leading to osmotic effect. Such verification is important as it would influence the irrigation scheduling of crops. It is also of interest to know whether the osmotic suction (due to the salts) would increase the water retention characteristics and hence the irrigation requirement. If so, then the tensiometer based irrigation scheduling would be an underestimate of the actual irrigation requirement of crops. To investigate these issues, the present study has performed controlled laboratory suction measurements using tensiometer in a locally available soil, contaminated with known concentration of inorganic salt solution. The total suction of the same salt laden soil has been measured using the WP4 dew point potentiameter technique. The results indicate negligible influence of salts present in the soil on tensiometer measurements. The study demonstrates the incapability of tensiometer to assess the osmotic component of salt present in the soil. This would result in the under prediction of water retention and hence irrigation requirement of the soil.

Keywords

Root zone Tensiometer Matric suction Water retention Irrigation scheduling Salt Osmotic suction 

Abbreviations

AEV

Air entry value

avg, af

Fitting parameters primarily dependent on the air entry value (AEV)

CS

Contaminated soil

hr

Suction (in kPa) corresponding to residual state

US

Uncontaminated soil

mvg, mf

Fitting parameters which depend on θ r

nvg, nf

Fitting parameters that are dependent on the rate of extraction of water from the soil

w

Gravimetric water content

ψm

Matric suction

ψo

Osmotic suction

ψ

Total suction

θ

Volumetric water content

θ(ψ)

Volumetric water content at any suction, ψ

θr

Residual volumetric water content

θs

Volumetric water content at saturation

γd

Dry unit weight

References

  1. Alam M, Rogers DH (1997) Tensiometer use in scheduling irrigation, report: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan, KansasGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM D854-06 (2006a) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer, annual book of ASTM standards, 4.08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM D4254-00 (2006b) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table, annual book of ASTM standards, 4.08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM D4253-00 (2006c) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table, annual book of ASTM standards, 4.08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM D422-63 (2007) Standard test method for particle—size analysis of soils, annual book of ASTM standards, 4.08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM D2487-06 (2008) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system), annual book of ASTM standards, 4.08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  7. Bacci L, Battista P, Rapi B (2007) An integrated method for irrigation scheduling of potted plants. Sci Hortic 116:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blaine H, Steve O (1998) Measuring soil moisture, report: University of California Irrigation Program, Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  9. Boutraa T, Akhkha A, Alshuaibi A, Atta R (2011) Evaluation of the effectiveness of an automated irrigation system using wheat crops. Agric Biol J N Am 2(1):80–88Google Scholar
  10. David H, James D (1999) Using tensiometers for measuring soil water and scheduling irrigation, L10, cooperative extension service, college of tropical agriculture & human resources (CTAHR). University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HIGoogle Scholar
  11. Decagon Devices (2006) Operator’s manual version 2, ECH2O-TE/EC-TM Water Content, EC and Temperature Sensor, Decagon Devices, Inc. 950 NE Nelson Court. Pullman, A99163, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Decagon Services Ltd. (2002) WP4 user’s manual, Decagon services Inc., USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Dominijanni A, Puma S, Manassero M (2011) Evaluation of the chemico-osmotic behaviour of a natural bentonite. Incontro Annuale dei Ricercatori di Geotecnica 2011—IARG 2011, Torino, 4–6 LuglioGoogle Scholar
  14. Dubetz S, Krogman KK (1973) Comparisons of methods of scheduling irrigations of potatoes. Am Potato J 50:408–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredlund DG, Xing A (1994) Equations for the soil-water characteristics curve. Can Geotech J 31(3):521–532Google Scholar
  17. Fritz SZ (1986) Ideality of clay membranes in osmotic processes: a review. Clays Clay Miner 34(2):214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gabr AI, Sharaky MM, El-Ashkar SA (1977) The combined effect of soil salinity and CCC on dry matter accumulation and yield of wheat plants. Biol Plantarum (Praha) 19(2):101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gill KS (1979) Effect of soil salinity on grain filling and grain development in Barley. Biol Plantarum (Praha) 21(4):241–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hootman RG, Kelsey PD, Reid R, Heide-Spravka KV (1994) Factors affecting accumulation of deicing salts in soils around trees. J Arboric 20(3):196–201Google Scholar
  21. Hoppula KI, Salo TJ (2006) Tensiometer-based irrigation scheduling in perennial strawberry cultivation. Irrig Sci 25:401–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kang JB, Shackelford CD (2010) Membrane behavior of compacted clay liners. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 136(10):1368–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kehoe E, Maher MJ, Hunter A, Campion J (2000) The use of tensiometers to control the irrigation of nursery stock in containers, Project 4460Teagasc, 19 Sandymount Avenue, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  24. Keijzer ThJS, Loch JPG (2001) Chemical osmosis in compacted dredging sludge. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kukal SS, Hira GS, Sidhu AS (2005) Soil matric potential-based irrigation scheduling to rice (Oryza sativa). Irrig Sci 23:153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lourenço SDN, Gallipoli D, Toll DG, Augarde CE, Evans FD (2011) Cavitation in high suction tensiometers: effect of temperature, time of use, and stone drying. Unsaturated Soils, Theory and PracticeGoogle Scholar
  27. Malaya C, Sreedeep S (2010) A study on the influence of measuring procedures on suction-water content relationship of a sandy soil. J Test Eval 38(6):1–9Google Scholar
  28. Malaya C, Sreedeep S (2012) Critical review on the parameters influencing soil-water characteristic curve. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 138(1):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malusisa MA, Shackelfordb CD, Olsen HW (2003) Flow and transport through clay membrane barriers. Eng Geol 70:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Migliaccio KW, Li YC (2012) Irrigation scheduling for tropical fruit groves in south florida, TR001, one of a series of the agricultural and biological Engineering department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu
  31. Muñoz-Carpena R, Bryan H, Klassen W, Dukes MD (2003) Automatic soil moisture-based drip irrigation for improving tomato production. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 1116:80–85Google Scholar
  32. Oki LR, Lieth JH, Tjosvold S (1994) Tensiometer-based irrigation of cut-flower roses, Project Report to the California Cut-flower CommissionGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahman MS, Matsumuro T, Miyake H, Takeoka Y (2001) Effects of salinity stress on the seminal root tip ultrastructres of rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod Sci 4(2):103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shah PH, Sreedeep S, Singh DN (2006) Evaluation of methodologies used for establishing soil-water characteristic curve. J ASTM Int 3(6):11Google Scholar
  35. Sreedeep S, Singh DN (2005) A study to investigate influence of soil properties on its suction. J Test Eval ASTM 33(1):61–66Google Scholar
  36. Sreedeep S, Singh DN (2006) Methodology for determining osmotic suction of soils. Geotech Geol Eng 24:1469–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sreedeep S, Singh DN (2008) Critical review of the methodologies employed for soil suction measurement. Int J Geomech 11(2):99–104Google Scholar
  38. Take WA, Bolton MD (2004) Tensiometer saturation and the reliable measurement of soil suction. Géotechnique 54(3):229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarantino A, Romero E, Cui YJ (2008) Laboratory and field testing of unsaturated soils. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. UMS GmbH (2001) T5 user manual, Version 1.8., MunichGoogle Scholar
  41. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringAssam Engineering CollegeGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations