Expansion of Cavities Embedded in Cohesionless Elastoplastic Half-Space and Subjected to Anisotropic Stress Field
Abstract
Cavity expansion theories are employed in a wide range of geotechnical applications including interpretation of pressure meter tests, evaluation of shaft capacity of piles, and pulling forces for horizontal directional drilling. Most of these theories assume infinite medium and isotropic stress field, which may not be justified for many applications. The main objectives of this paper are two folds: to investigate the effects of the free surface, stress gradient, and in situ stress anisotropy on the displacements during the expansion phase of cavities embedded in dilatant sands; and to establish correction factors to account for these effects. The investigation was conducted using two-dimensional finite element analyses. It was found that the cavity expansion theory due to Yu and Houlsby (Geotechnique 41:173–183, 1991) can be used reliably for cases subjected to an initial isotropic stress and embedment depth to diameter ratio of 20 or higher. However, it becomes inaccurate for shallow embedment depth and/or stress anisotropy conditions. An analytical procedure to account for the effects of embedment and/or stress anisotropy was proposed. The applicability of the proposed procedure was demonstrated for a wide range of soil properties and geometrical configurations. The results obtained confirmed its ability to estimate the cavity pressures within 10 % of the values obtained using FEA calculations.
Keywords
Cavity expansion Horizontal direction drilling Cohesionless material SSIReferences
- Bishop RF, Hill R, Mott NF (1945) Theory of indentation and hardness tests. Proc Phys Soc 57:147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bolton MD (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique 36(1):65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carter JP, Booker JR, Yeung SK (1986) Cavity expansion in cohesive frictional soils. Geotechnique 36(3):349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chadwick P (1959) The quasi-static expansion of a spherical cavity in metals and ideal soils. Q J Mech Appl Math 12:52–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- El Naggar MH, Sakr M (2000) Evaluation of axial performance of tapered piles from centrifuge tests. Can Geotech J 37(6):1295–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fernando V, Moore ID (2002) Use of cavity expansion theory to predict ground displacement during pipe bursting. In Proceedings of Pipelines 2002, ASCE, Cleveland, OH, 11 ppGoogle Scholar
- Gibson RE, Anderson WF (1961) In situ measurement of soil properties with the pressure meter. Civil Eng Public Works Rev 56:615–618Google Scholar
- Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Houlsby GT, Withers NJ (1988) Analysis of the cone pressure meter test in clay. Geotechnique 38:573–587Google Scholar
- Hughes JMO, Wrath CP, Windle D (1977) Pressure meter tests in sands. Geotechnique 27(4):455–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Palmer AC (1972) Undrained plane-strain expansion of a cylindrical cavity in clay: a simple interpretation of the pressure meter test. Geotechnique 22(3):451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Randolph MF, Carter JP, Wrath CP (1979) Driven piles in clay–the effects of installation and subsequent consolidation. Geotechnique 29(4):361–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salgado R, Mitchell JK, Jamiolkowski M (1997) Cavity expansion and penetration resistance in sand. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(4):344–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vesic AS (1972) Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass. J Soil Mech Fdns Div ASCE 98(SM3):265–290Google Scholar
- Yu HS, Carter JP (2002) Rigorous similarity solutions for cavity expansion in cohesive-frictional soils. Int J Geomechanics 2(2):233–258Google Scholar
- Yu HS, Houlsby GT (1991) Finite cavity expansion in dilatant soils: loading analysis. Geotechnique 41:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar