Advertisement

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 225–236 | Cite as

Preparedness and Warning Systems for Populations with Special Needs: Ensuring Everyone Gets the Message (and Knows What To Do)

  • Helen T. SullivanEmail author
  • Markku T. Häkkinen
Original paper

Abstract

The recent South Asian Tsunami has brought world-wide awareness to the effects of major disasters upon all segments of society. Vulnerable populations such as the disabled, children, or the elderly are at particular risk in a disaster and it is vital to consider their special needs in the design of disaster preparedness and warning systems. Additionally, tourists, recent immigrants, and refugees face challenges when confronted with disaster in unfamiliar locations, linguistically isolated, and in need of assimilating lifesaving information and guidance quickly when under stress. Attention to the requirements for persons with disabilities may also benefit the greater general population which can find itself situationally disabled. Information and Communications Technology based upon accessible design principles is part of the solution. Understanding of psychology, ergonomics, and information design is vital, as are the unique perceptual, cognitive, physical, and linguistic challenges that can influence the efficacy of the message. These issues are among those addressed in an ongoing project in Urakawa, Japan, which is developing a disaster preparedness information system that meets the needs of persons with disabilities.

Keywords

Preparedness Technology Disability Disabilities Tsunami Psychology Accessibility Human Factors ICT 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support for this work was provided by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology granted to the Research Institute of the National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities (NRCD) by the Government of Japan. Additional support was provided by the DAISY for All Project with funding by the Nippon Foundation. The authors wish to thank Hiroshi Kawamura, of the DAISY Consortium and the NRCD Research Institute, for his support of our work in Japan.

References

  1. Avanzini F, Rocchesso D, Dal Palù A, Dovier A, Belussi A (2004) A urban-scale auditory alert system for high tides in Venice. IEEE Comput 37(9):55–61Google Scholar
  2. Cox DC (2001) The inappropriate Tsunami icon. Sci Tsunami Hazards 19(2):77–86Google Scholar
  3. DAISY (2005) Digital accessible information system. The DAISY Consortium. http://www.daisy.org
  4. DeMeglio M, Hakkinen M, Kawamura H (2002) Accessible interface design: adaptive multimedia information system (AMIS). In: Misesenberger K, Klaus J, Zagler W (eds) Computers helping people with special needs: ICCHP 2002. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. DFA (2005) The DAISY for all project. http://www.daisy-for-all.org
  6. EERI (2003) Preliminary observations on the Tokachi-Oki, Japan, earthquake of September 26, 2003. EERI Special Report, December, 2003. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. http://www.eeri.org/lfe/pdf/japan_tokachi_eeri_preliminary_report.pdf
  7. ERC (2003) Off-shore Tokachi earthquake on September 26, 2003. Earthquake Research Committee, Prime Minister’s Office, Government of Japan. http://www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/03sep_tokachi/index-e.htm
  8. Free Mobility Assistance Project (2005). http://www.jiritsu-project.jp
  9. Furumoto A, Tatehata H, Morioka C (1999) Japanese tsunami warning system. Sci Tsunami Hazards 17(2):85–106Google Scholar
  10. Hakkinen MT, Sullivan HT (2005) Preparedness and response to disasters for persons with disabilities: information and communications technology enabling survival through training, awareness and action. In: Presentation at the international symposium on disaster preparedness of persons with disabilities; the role of information and communication technologies, 24–25 January 2005, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu W (2001) A nation challenged: survivor; violent sounds of an escape from the 71st Floor. New York Times, Late Edition-Final, Section 1B, Page 10, Column 3, October 7, 2001Google Scholar
  12. IFNET (2005) Recommendation by IFNet “Towards flood disasters reduction”, January 19th, 2005, at international conference center Kobe, Japan, http://www.internationalfloodnetwork.org/2ndGM_sp_e.html
  13. Imamura F (2005) Tsunami simulation for the warning and risk evaluation. In: Presentation at the international coordination meeting for the development of tsunami warning and mitigation system for the Indian ocean within a global framework. March 3, 2005Google Scholar
  14. ITIC (2005) International tsunami signs. International tsunami information center. http://ioc3.unesco.org/itic/categories.php?category_no=168
  15. JMA (2005) Tsunami warning system in Japan. Japan meteorological agency. January, 2005. http://www.jma.go.jp/JMA_HP/jma/jma-eng/contents/tsunamisystem.pdf
  16. Kong LSL (2005) The international tsunami information center. In: Presentation at the international coordination meeting for the development of tsunami warning and mitigation system for the Indian ocean within a global framework. March 3, 2005Google Scholar
  17. Lachman R, Tatsuoka M, Bonk WJ (1961) Human behavior during the tsunami of May, 1960. Science 133:1405–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. NCAM (2005) Access to emergency alerts for people with disabilities (October 2004, September 2007). National Center on Accessible Media. http://ncam.wgbh.org/alerts
  19. NCD (2005) Saving lives: including people with disabilities in emergency planning. Report from the National Council on Disability. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. NCTS (2000) Effective disaster warnings: report by the working group on natural disaster information systems, subcommittee on natural disaster reduction. National Science and Technology Council. Washington, DC, November 2000Google Scholar
  21. NIST (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the world trade center disaster: occupant behavior, egress, and emergency communications, NIST NCSTAR 1-7 (DRAFT). National Institute of Standards and Technology. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. NOD (2005) EPI guide for emergency managers, planners & responders: revised edition. National Organization on Disability. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Obi T (2005) ICT saves lives—ICT in disaster reduction & The Japanese Challenge for Global Standard. In: United Nations international strategy for disaster reduction world conference on disaster reduction, Session 5-4, 18 January 2005, Kobe, JapanGoogle Scholar
  24. Plate E (2005) Early warning system for the lower Mekong river. In: Presentation at the world conference on disaster reduction: thematic cluster on risk identification, assessment, monitoring and early warning, Kobe, JapanGoogle Scholar
  25. Ross W (2005) Tsunami scare holds lessons for coast. The Register-Guard, Eugene, Oregon. http://www.registerguard.com/news/2005/06/16/a1.tsunamireax.0616.html
  26. Sartpisut A, Fein S (2005) Mixed reviews for evacuation drill. The Phuket Gazette 12(19)Google Scholar
  27. Stanton NA, Edworthy J (1999) Human Factors in Auditory Warnings. Ashgate Publishers, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  28. Sullivan HT, Hakkinen MT (2005) Video interviews in Thailand & Japan, January–May 2005. Unpublished raw dataGoogle Scholar
  29. Taipei Times (2005) Oral history saved islanders from tsunami. The Taipei Times. March 2, 2005. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2005/03/02/2003225170
  30. Torchia C (2005) In Sri Lankan shelter, disabled lay in their beds as water engulfed them. Associated Press, New York, January 1, 2005Google Scholar
  31. UNISDR (2005a) United Nations international strategy for disaster reduction world conference on disaster reduction, 18–22 January 2005. Kobe, Japan. http://www.unisdr.org/wcdr/wcdr-index.htm
  32. UNSIDR (2005b) Report of the United Nations international strategy for disaster reduction world conference on disaster reduction, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18–22 January 2005, A/CONF.206/6Google Scholar
  33. UNSIDR (2005c) Media monitoring reporty. In: United Nations international strategy for disaster reduction world conference on disaster reduction, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, 18–22 January 2005Google Scholar
  34. US Census (2005) 2003 American Community Survey Summary Tables (P058). http://www.census.gov
  35. USDOJ (1990) The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. (Public Law 101-336). United States Department of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Vanderheiden GC, Nelson RK, Yan L, Sesto ME (2004) Strategies for mainstream cellular phone use by individuals with moderate to severe cognitive impairments. In: Paper presented at human factors and ergonomics society, September 20–24, pp 937–940 of HFES Proceedings Google Scholar
  37. W3C (1999) Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT
  38. W3C (2002) User agent accessibility guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10/
  39. W3C (2005) Web accessibility initiative (WAI). World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/WAI
  40. Walker DA (1996) Human factors compounding the destructiveness of future tsunamis. Sci Tsunami Hazards 14(2):79–84Google Scholar
  41. White House (2004) Executive order: individuals with disabilities in emergency preparedness. The White House, Washington, DC. July 22, 2004. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/07/20040722-10.html
  42. World Health Organization (2005) Disability, including preventions, management and rehabilitation: Report by the Secretariat. Fifty-eighth World Health AssemblyGoogle Scholar
  43. Zelmanowitz E (2002) September 11th 2001 Victims Site: Abraham J. Zelmanowitz, 55, New York, N.Y. http://www.september11victims.com/september11Victims/VictimInfo.asp?ID=3784

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRider UniversityLawrencevilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical Information TechnologyUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations